These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9177909)

  • 1. Diagnostic validity as a theoretical concept and as a measurable quantity.
    Büttner J
    Clin Chim Acta; 1997 Apr; 260(2):131-43. PubMed ID: 9177909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Laboratory findings: structure, validity and significance for medical cognitive processes.
    Büttner J
    Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem; 1991 Aug; 29(8):507-19. PubMed ID: 1954305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [The use of laboratory data].
    Keller H
    Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1991 Dec; 121(50):1861-9. PubMed ID: 1759145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Avoiding and identifying errors in health technology assessment models: qualitative study and methodological review.
    Chilcott J; Tappenden P; Rawdin A; Johnson M; Kaltenthaler E; Paisley S; Papaioannou D; Shippam A
    Health Technol Assess; 2010 May; 14(25):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-107. PubMed ID: 20501062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Discordance rate, a new concept for combining diagnostic decisions with analytical performance characteristics. 1. Application in method or sample system comparisons and in defining decision limits.
    Haeckel R; Wosniok W; Puentmann I
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2003 Mar; 41(3):347-55. PubMed ID: 12705345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [The quality control in the coagulation laboratory].
    Ruiz-de-Chávez-Ochoa AA; Núñez-Pérez E; Muñoz-Muñoz B; Majluf-Cruz A
    Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc; 2008; 46(3):339-48. PubMed ID: 19133213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A new concept to derive permissible limits for analytical imprecision and bias considering diagnostic requirements and technical state-of-the-art.
    Haeckel R; Wosniok W
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2011 Apr; 49(4):623-35. PubMed ID: 21345158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. When is a test positive? The use of decision analysis to optimize test interpretation.
    Bergus GR
    Fam Med; 1993; 25(10):656-60. PubMed ID: 8288070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Laboratory results in clinical practice: importance of interpretation in the clinical context].
    Baumgartner A; Schuetz P
    Ther Umsch; 2015 Feb; 72(2):119-23. PubMed ID: 25630294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cognitive errors in diagnosis: instantiation, classification, and consequences.
    Kassirer JP; Kopelman RI
    Am J Med; 1989 Apr; 86(4):433-41. PubMed ID: 2648823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Managing quality vs. measuring uncertainty in the medical laboratory.
    Westgard JO
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2010; 48(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 19919330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Genomic Tests: From Basic Research to Clinical Practice].
    Nakatani K; Mochiki I
    Rinsho Byori; 2015 Mar; 63(3):377-83. PubMed ID: 26524861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Measuring the impact of diagnostic decision support on the quality of clinical decision making: development of a reliable and valid composite score.
    Ramnarayan P; Kapoor RR; Coren M; Nanduri V; Tomlinson AL; Taylor PM; Wyatt JC; Britto JF
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2003; 10(6):563-72. PubMed ID: 12925549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Diagnostic error as a result of drug-laboratory test interactions.
    van Balveren JA; Verboeket-van de Venne WPHG; Erdem-Eraslan L; de Graaf AJ; Loot AE; Musson REA; Oosterhuis WP; Schuijt MP; van der Sijs H; Verheul RJ; de Wolf HK; Kusters R; Hoedemakers RMJ;
    Diagnosis (Berl); 2019 Mar; 6(1):69-71. PubMed ID: 30753158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The NEXUS vision: an alternative to the reference value concept.
    Goldschmidt HM
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2004; 42(7):868-73. PubMed ID: 15327025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Analytical quality, performance indices and laboratory service.
    Hilden J; Magid E
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 1999 Nov; 59(7):555-8. PubMed ID: 10667698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Determining qualitative effect size ratings using a likelihood ratio scatter matrix in diagnostic test accuracy systematic reviews.
    Rubinstein ML; Kraft CS; Parrott JS
    Diagnosis (Berl); 2018 Nov; 5(4):205-214. PubMed ID: 30243015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The brain-to-brain loop concept for laboratory testing 40 years after its introduction.
    Plebani M; Laposata M; Lundberg GD
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2011 Dec; 136(6):829-33. PubMed ID: 22095366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Decision Support to Enhance Automated Laboratory Testing by Leveraging Analytical Capabilities.
    Tuthill JM
    Clin Lab Med; 2019 Jun; 39(2):259-267. PubMed ID: 31036279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.