These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9178018)

  • 1. A likelihood approach to populations samples of microsatellite alleles.
    Nielsen R
    Genetics; 1997 Jun; 146(2):711-6. PubMed ID: 9178018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Microsatellite evolution: Markov transition functions for a suite of models.
    Watkins JC
    Theor Popul Biol; 2007 Mar; 71(2):147-59. PubMed ID: 17123560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Maximum-likelihood and markov chain monte carlo approaches to estimate inbreeding and effective size from allele frequency changes.
    Laval G; SanCristobal M; Chevalet C
    Genetics; 2003 Jul; 164(3):1189-204. PubMed ID: 12871924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Single-locus tests of microsatellite evolution: multi-step mutations and constraints on allele size.
    Nielsen R; Palsbøll PJ
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 1999 Apr; 11(3):477-84. PubMed ID: 10196086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Markov chain description of the stepwise mutation model: local and global behaviour of the allele process.
    Caliebe A; Jochens A; Krawczak M; Rösler U
    J Theor Biol; 2010 Sep; 266(2):336-42. PubMed ID: 20600139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A maximum-likelihood approach to fitting equilibrium models of microsatellite evolution.
    Sibly RM; Whittaker JC; Talbot M
    Mol Biol Evol; 2001 Mar; 18(3):413-7. PubMed ID: 11230542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A note on the accuracy of PAC-likelihood inference with microsatellite data.
    Cornuet JM; Beaumont MA
    Theor Popul Biol; 2007 Feb; 71(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 16890970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Importance sampling for the infinite sites model.
    Hobolth A; Uyenoyama MK; Wiuf C
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2008; 7(1):Article32. PubMed ID: 18976228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Brownian models and coalescent structures.
    Blum MG; Damerval C; Manel S; François O
    Theor Popul Biol; 2004 May; 65(3):249-61. PubMed ID: 15066421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimating effective population size or mutation rate with microsatellites.
    Xu H; Fu YX
    Genetics; 2004 Jan; 166(1):555-63. PubMed ID: 15020444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Microsatellite mutation models: insights from a comparison of humans and chimpanzees.
    Sainudiin R; Durrett RT; Aquadro CF; Nielsen R
    Genetics; 2004 Sep; 168(1):383-95. PubMed ID: 15454551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Maximum likelihood estimation of individual inbreeding coefficients and null allele frequencies.
    Hall N; Mercer L; Phillips D; Shaw J; Anderson AD
    Genet Res (Camb); 2012 Jun; 94(3):151-61. PubMed ID: 22805896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Efficient simulation and likelihood methods for non-neutral multi-allele models.
    Joyce P; Genz A; Buzbas EO
    J Comput Biol; 2012 Jun; 19(6):650-61. PubMed ID: 22697240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A maximum-likelihood method to correct for allelic dropout in microsatellite data with no replicate genotypes.
    Wang C; Schroeder KB; Rosenberg NA
    Genetics; 2012 Oct; 192(2):651-69. PubMed ID: 22851645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Detecting population expansion and decline using microsatellites.
    Beaumont MA
    Genetics; 1999 Dec; 153(4):2013-29. PubMed ID: 10581303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Microsatellite null alleles and estimation of population differentiation.
    Chapuis MP; Estoup A
    Mol Biol Evol; 2007 Mar; 24(3):621-31. PubMed ID: 17150975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Estimating the scaled mutation rate and mutation bias with site frequency data.
    Vogl C
    Theor Popul Biol; 2014 Dec; 98():19-27. PubMed ID: 25453604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Improved estimation of the proportion of triploids in populations with diploid and triploid individuals.
    Ridout MS
    J Hered; 2000; 91(1):57-60. PubMed ID: 10739127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Likelihood-based inferences under isolation by distance: two-dimensional habitats and confidence intervals.
    Rousset F; Leblois R
    Mol Biol Evol; 2012 Mar; 29(3):957-73. PubMed ID: 22016575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Statistical tests for detection of misspecified relationships by use of genome-screen data.
    McPeek MS; Sun L
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Mar; 66(3):1076-94. PubMed ID: 10712219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.