BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9178138)

  • 1. Dominance models with method R for stature of Holsteins.
    Misztal I; Lawlor TJ; Fernando RL
    J Dairy Sci; 1997 May; 80(5):975-8. PubMed ID: 9178138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Method R estimates of additive genetic, dominance genetic, and permanent environmental fraction of variance for yield and health traits of Holsteins.
    Van Tassell CP; Misztal I; Varona L
    J Dairy Sci; 2000 Aug; 83(8):1873-7. PubMed ID: 10984165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of full sibs on additive breeding values under the dominance model for stature in United States Holsteins.
    Varona L; Misztal I; Bertrand JK; Lawlor TJ
    J Dairy Sci; 1998 Apr; 81(4):1126-35. PubMed ID: 9594402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Genetic components of heat stress for dairy cattle with multiple lactations.
    Aguilar I; Misztal I; Tsuruta S
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 Nov; 92(11):5702-11. PubMed ID: 19841230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Model comparison for genetic evaluation of milk yield in crossbred Holsteins in the tropics.
    Chanvijit K; Duangjinda M; Pattarajinda V; Reodecha C
    J Appl Genet; 2005; 46(4):387-93. PubMed ID: 16278512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Production traits of Holstein cattle: estimation of nonadditive genetic variance components and inbreeding depression.
    Miglior F; Burnside EB; Kennedy BW
    J Dairy Sci; 1995 May; 78(5):1174-80. PubMed ID: 7622728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Variance components for test-day milk, fat, and protein yield, and somatic cell score for analyzing management information.
    Caccamo M; Veerkamp RF; de Jong G; Pool MH; Petriglieri R; Licitra G
    J Dairy Sci; 2008 Aug; 91(8):3268-76. PubMed ID: 18650304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Variances of additive and dominance genetic effects for ovulation and twinning rates in a population selected for twinning.
    Van Vleck LD; Gregory KE
    J Anim Sci; 1996 Jun; 74(6):1234-9. PubMed ID: 8791194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Additive and nonadditive genetic variance in female fertility of Holsteins.
    Hoeschele I
    J Dairy Sci; 1991 May; 74(5):1743-52. PubMed ID: 1880275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Genetic parameters for first and second lactation milk yields of Polish black and white cattle with random regression test-day models.
    Strabel T; Misztal I
    J Dairy Sci; 1999 Dec; 82(12):2805-10. PubMed ID: 10629829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Nonadditive genetic effects and inbreeding depression for somatic cell counts of Holstein cattle.
    Miglior F; Burnside EB; Dekkers JC
    J Dairy Sci; 1995 May; 78(5):1168-73. PubMed ID: 7622727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of pen mates on growth, backfat depth, and longissimus muscle area of swine.
    Hsu WL; Johnson RK; Van Vleck LD
    J Anim Sci; 2010 Mar; 88(3):895-902. PubMed ID: 19933426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Parametric correlation functions to model the structure of permanent environmental (co)variances in milk yield random regression models.
    Bignardi AB; El Faro L; Cardoso VL; Machado PF; Albuquerque LG
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 Sep; 92(9):4634-40. PubMed ID: 19700726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Standardization of lactation means of somatic cell scores for calculation of genetic evaluations.
    Schutz MM; VanRaden PM; Wiggans GR; Norman HD
    J Dairy Sci; 1995 Aug; 78(8):1843-54. PubMed ID: 8786268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Additive and nonadditive genetic variances for milk yield, fertility, and lifetime performance traits of dairy cattle.
    Fuerst C; Sölkner J
    J Dairy Sci; 1994 Apr; 77(4):1114-25. PubMed ID: 8201046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Genetic variation in lactation means of somatic cell scores for six breeds of dairy cattle.
    Schutz MM; Vanraden PM; Wiggans GR
    J Dairy Sci; 1994 Jan; 77(1):284-93. PubMed ID: 8120197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Genetic parameters for tunisian holsteins using a test-day random regression model.
    Hammami H; Rekik B; Soyeurt H; Ben Gara A; Gengler N
    J Dairy Sci; 2008 May; 91(5):2118-26. PubMed ID: 18420643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Variances of direct genetic effects, maternal genetic effects, and cytoplasmic inheritance effects for milk yield, fat yield, and fat percentage.
    Albuquerque LG; Keown JF; Van Vleck LD
    J Dairy Sci; 1998 Feb; 81(2):544-9. PubMed ID: 9532509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Analysis of test day yield data of Costa Rican dairy cattle.
    Vargas B; Perez E; Van Arendonk JA
    J Dairy Sci; 1998 Jan; 81(1):255-63. PubMed ID: 9493102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Covariance functions for body weight from birth to maturity in Nellore cows.
    Boligon AA; Mercadante ME; Forni S; Lôbo RB; Albuquerque LG
    J Anim Sci; 2010 Mar; 88(3):849-59. PubMed ID: 19897625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.