163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9178148)
41. [Induced labor with prostaglandins: 0.5 mg PGE2 intracervical gel versus 3 mg PGE2 vaginal tablet].
Müller T; Rempen A
Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol; 1995; 199(1):30-4. PubMed ID: 7725767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. A randomised controlled trial of outpatient compared with inpatient cervical ripening with prostaglandin E₂ (OPRA study).
Wilkinson C; Bryce R; Adelson P; Turnbull D
BJOG; 2015 Jan; 122(1):94-104. PubMed ID: 24824157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. [The value of the administration of prostaglandin E2 on the biodegradable support of the maturation of the cervix uteri and the induction of labor].
Lopes P; Besse O; Sagot P; Dantal F; de Morel P; Panel N; Lerat MF
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1991; 20(6):827-32. PubMed ID: 1822492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. [Dinoprostone: slow release vaginal insert (Propess) and intracervical gel (Prepidil) for the induction of labour with unriped cervix].
Grignaffini A; Soncini E; Anfuso S; Ronzoni E
Minerva Ginecol; 2004 Oct; 56(5):413-8. PubMed ID: 15531859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. A randomised double-blind study of vaginal misoprostol vs dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labour induction in prolonged pregnancy.
Lee HY
Singapore Med J; 1997 Jul; 38(7):292-4. PubMed ID: 9339095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Local application of prostaglandin E2 for cervical ripening or induction of term labor.
Ulmsten U; Wingerup L; Ekman G
Clin Obstet Gynecol; 1983 Mar; 26(1):95-105. PubMed ID: 6340898
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. [Fetal outcome after cervical ripeness-adjusted labor induction with prostaglandin E2 in relation to cervix status. Results of a multicenter study].
Bredow V; Straube W
Zentralbl Gynakol; 1993; 115(12):530-6. PubMed ID: 8147164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Comparison of prostaglandin E2 tablets or Foley catheter for labour induction in grand multiparas.
Al-Taani MI
East Mediterr Health J; 2004; 10(4-5):547-53. PubMed ID: 16335645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Comparative study of misoprostol vs dinoprostone for induction of labour.
Kulshreshtha S; Sharma P; Mohan G; Singh S; Singh S
Indian J Physiol Pharmacol; 2007; 51(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 17877293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Elective cervical ripening in women beyond the 290th day of pregnancy: a randomized trial comparing 2 dinoprostone preparations.
Facchinetti F; Venturini P; Fazzio M; Volpe A
J Reprod Med; 2007 Oct; 52(10):945-9. PubMed ID: 17977171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Cervical ripening and labor outcome with preinduction intracervical prostaglandin E2 (Prepidil) gel.
Nager CW; Key TC; Moore TR
J Perinatol; 1987; 7(3):189-93. PubMed ID: 3504454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. [Induced labor with prostaglandin E2 gel after previous cesarean section].
Behrens O; Goeschen K; Jakob H; Kauffels W
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1994 Mar; 54(3):144-50. PubMed ID: 8188012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. The influence of dinoprostone on uterine cervix ripening and the course of labor.
Wielgos M; Szymusik I; Kosinska-Kaczynska K; Suchonska B; Kaminski P; Banaszek-Wysoczanska A; Bomba-Opon D; Szpotanska M
Neuro Endocrinol Lett; 2007 Aug; 28(4):513-7. PubMed ID: 17693987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. [Cervical maturation and induction of labor with PgE2 gel. Authors' experience].
Carta G; Vigilante M; Di Cesare S; Mascaretti G; Caserta D; Moscarini M
Minerva Ginecol; 1997 Oct; 49(10):427-32. PubMed ID: 9463175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Cervical priming and labor induction by multiple doses of intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel.
Norchi S; Zanini A; Regalia AL; Pollini A; Silva A
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1992 May; 38(1):5-7. PubMed ID: 1348992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Intravaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone as cervical ripening and labor-inducing agents.
Fletcher H; Mitchell S; Frederick J; Simeon D; Brown D
Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Feb; 83(2):244-7. PubMed ID: 8290188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Prospective multi-centre randomised trial comparing induction of labour with a double-balloon catheter versus dinoprostone.
Løkkegaard E; Lundstrøm M; Kjær MM; Christensen IJ; Pedersen HB; Nyholm H
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2015; 35(8):797-802. PubMed ID: 25692241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Maturation of the uterine cervix by repeated intracervical instillation of prostaglandin E2.
Milliez JM; Jannet D; Touboul C; el Medjadji M; Paniel BJ
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Sep; 165(3):523-8. PubMed ID: 1892176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Factors predicting labour onset in patients treated with prostaglandin E2 for cervical ripening.
Facchinetti F; Neri I; Genazzani AR
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1995 Jun; 60(2):129-32. PubMed ID: 7641963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. The value of the cervical score in predicting successful outcome of labor induction.
Williams MC; Krammer J; O'Brien WF
Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Nov; 90(5):784-9. PubMed ID: 9351765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
