These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9179417)
1. Response to "Discontinuing life support in an infant of a drug addicted mother: whose decision is it?" By Renu Jain and David C. Thomasma (CQ Vol 6, No 1). Ethics and drug infants. Oberman M Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1997; 6(2):235-9. PubMed ID: 9179417 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Response to "Ethics and drug infants" by Michelle Oberman (CQ vol. 6, no. 2). Jain R; Thomasma DC; Ragas R Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1998; 7(1):94-6. PubMed ID: 9523046 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Discontinuing life support in an infant of a drug-addicted mother: whose decision is it? Jain R; Thomasma DC Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1997; 6(1):48-54. PubMed ID: 9111961 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The limits of proxy decision making: undertreatment. Gillick MR; Fried T Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1995; 4(2):172-7. PubMed ID: 7655668 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. In re Michael Martin. Davis SM Issues Law Med; 1994; 10(3):355-9. PubMed ID: 7829309 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Looking for traction on the slippery slope: a discussion of the Michael Martin Case. Hess JH Issues Law Med; 1995; 11(2):105-22. PubMed ID: 7591660 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Terri Schiavo and the law. Marks TC Albany Law Rev; 2004; 67(3):843-7. PubMed ID: 15551518 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Futility and the goals of medicine. Rhodes R J Clin Ethics; 1998; 9(2):194-205. PubMed ID: 9750993 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. In re Donald McCarthy. Harburg M Issues Law Med; 1994; 10(2):225-8. PubMed ID: 7960666 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The role of courts in terminating nutrition and hydration for incompetent patients. Wintersheimer DC Issues Law Med; 1995; 10(4):453-65. PubMed ID: 7737850 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Patients should not always come first in treatment decisions. Strong C J Clin Ethics; 1993; 4(1):63-5. PubMed ID: 8490224 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Nguyen v. Sacred Heart Medical Center. Altomare J; Bolde M Issues Law Med; 1995; 11(2):199-201. PubMed ID: 7591667 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Child abuse by whom? -- Parental rights and judicial competency determinations: the Baby K and Baby Terry cases. Bopp J; Coleson RE Ohio North Univ Law Rev; 1994; 20(4):821-46. PubMed ID: 11652997 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The arrogance of power unchecked--the terrible, grotesque tragedy of the case of Terri Schiavo. Barie PS Surg Infect (Larchmt); 2005; 6(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 15865546 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. US doctors win life support lawsuit. Rutter TL BMJ; 1995 May; 310(6989):1223-4. PubMed ID: 7767189 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Infants with anencephaly, the ADA, and the Child Abuse Amendments. Crossley M Issues Law Med; 1996; 11(4):379-410. PubMed ID: 8934859 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Los Angeles Ethics Committee issues valuable guidelines on forgoing life sustaining treatment for minors. Brown LC; Paine SJ; Weinstein KR J Trauma Nurs; 1997; 4(1):22-5. PubMed ID: 9325817 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. "'How do you catch a cloud and pin it down?" (with apologies to Rogers and Hammerstein): a commentary on Layson and colleagues. Povar GJ J Clin Ethics; 1994; 5(3):253-6. PubMed ID: 7841479 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]