These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9180039)

  • 1. Talker identification based on phonetic information.
    Remez RE; Fellowes JM; Rubin PE
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1997 Jun; 23(3):651-66. PubMed ID: 9180039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. On the perception of similarity among talkers.
    Remez RE; Fellowes JM; Nagel DS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Dec; 122(6):3688-96. PubMed ID: 18247776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perceiving the sex and identity of a talker without natural vocal timbre.
    Fellowes JM; Remez RE; Rubin PE
    Percept Psychophys; 1997 Aug; 59(6):839-49. PubMed ID: 9270359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hierarchical contributions of linguistic knowledge to talker identification: Phonological versus lexical familiarity.
    McLaughlin DE; Carter YD; Cheng CC; Perrachione TK
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 May; 81(4):1088-1107. PubMed ID: 31218598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Acoustic-phonetic correlates of talker intelligibility for adults and children.
    Hazan V; Markham D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Nov; 116(5):3108-18. PubMed ID: 15603156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Individual talker differences in voice-onset-time.
    Allen JS; Miller JL; DeSteno D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Jan; 113(1):544-52. PubMed ID: 12558290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Listener sensitivity to individual talker differences in voice-onset-time.
    Allen JS; Miller JL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Jun; 115(6):3171-83. PubMed ID: 15237841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Talker familiarity and the accommodation of talker variability.
    Magnuson JS; Nusbaum HC; Akahane-Yamada R; Saltzman D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 May; 83(4):1842-1860. PubMed ID: 33398658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The role of talker-specific information in word segmentation by infants.
    Houston DM; Jusczyk PW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2000 Oct; 26(5):1570-82. PubMed ID: 11039485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Voice-sensitive brain networks encode talker-specific phonetic detail.
    Myers EB; Theodore RM
    Brain Lang; 2017 Feb; 165():33-44. PubMed ID: 27898342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of cross-language voice training on speech perception: whose familiar voices are more intelligible?
    Levi SV; Winters SJ; Pisoni DB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Dec; 130(6):4053-62. PubMed ID: 22225059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Learning to recognize talkers from natural, sinewave, and reversed speech samples.
    Sheffert SM; Pisoni DB; Fellowes JM; Remez RE
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2002 Dec; 28(6):1447-69. PubMed ID: 12542137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multiple sources of acoustic variation affect speech processing efficiency.
    Kapadia AM; Tin JAA; Perrachione TK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2023 Jan; 153(1):209. PubMed ID: 36732274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Acoustic differences, listener expectations, and the perceptual accommodation of talker variability.
    Magnuson JS; Nusbaum HC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Apr; 33(2):391-409. PubMed ID: 17469975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Coding of the speech spectrum in three time-varying sinusoids.
    Remez RE; Rubin PE; Pisoni DB
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1983; 405():485-9. PubMed ID: 6575670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of talker familiarity on spoken word identification in younger and older listeners.
    Yonan CA; Sommers MS
    Psychol Aging; 2000 Mar; 15(1):88-99. PubMed ID: 10755292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
    Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Talker-specific learning in speech perception.
    Nygaard LC; Pisoni DB
    Percept Psychophys; 1998 Apr; 60(3):355-76. PubMed ID: 9599989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Varying acoustic-phonemic ambiguity reveals that talker normalization is obligatory in speech processing.
    Choi JY; Hu ER; Perrachione TK
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Apr; 80(3):784-797. PubMed ID: 29417449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perceptual learning of multiple talkers requires additional exposure.
    Luthra S; Mechtenberg H; Myers EB
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Jul; 83(5):2217-2228. PubMed ID: 33754298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.