227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9180039)
1. Talker identification based on phonetic information.
Remez RE; Fellowes JM; Rubin PE
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1997 Jun; 23(3):651-66. PubMed ID: 9180039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. On the perception of similarity among talkers.
Remez RE; Fellowes JM; Nagel DS
J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Dec; 122(6):3688-96. PubMed ID: 18247776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Perceiving the sex and identity of a talker without natural vocal timbre.
Fellowes JM; Remez RE; Rubin PE
Percept Psychophys; 1997 Aug; 59(6):839-49. PubMed ID: 9270359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Hierarchical contributions of linguistic knowledge to talker identification: Phonological versus lexical familiarity.
McLaughlin DE; Carter YD; Cheng CC; Perrachione TK
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 May; 81(4):1088-1107. PubMed ID: 31218598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Acoustic-phonetic correlates of talker intelligibility for adults and children.
Hazan V; Markham D
J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Nov; 116(5):3108-18. PubMed ID: 15603156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Individual talker differences in voice-onset-time.
Allen JS; Miller JL; DeSteno D
J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Jan; 113(1):544-52. PubMed ID: 12558290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Listener sensitivity to individual talker differences in voice-onset-time.
Allen JS; Miller JL
J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Jun; 115(6):3171-83. PubMed ID: 15237841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Talker familiarity and the accommodation of talker variability.
Magnuson JS; Nusbaum HC; Akahane-Yamada R; Saltzman D
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 May; 83(4):1842-1860. PubMed ID: 33398658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The role of talker-specific information in word segmentation by infants.
Houston DM; Jusczyk PW
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2000 Oct; 26(5):1570-82. PubMed ID: 11039485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Voice-sensitive brain networks encode talker-specific phonetic detail.
Myers EB; Theodore RM
Brain Lang; 2017 Feb; 165():33-44. PubMed ID: 27898342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of cross-language voice training on speech perception: whose familiar voices are more intelligible?
Levi SV; Winters SJ; Pisoni DB
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Dec; 130(6):4053-62. PubMed ID: 22225059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Learning to recognize talkers from natural, sinewave, and reversed speech samples.
Sheffert SM; Pisoni DB; Fellowes JM; Remez RE
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2002 Dec; 28(6):1447-69. PubMed ID: 12542137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Multiple sources of acoustic variation affect speech processing efficiency.
Kapadia AM; Tin JAA; Perrachione TK
J Acoust Soc Am; 2023 Jan; 153(1):209. PubMed ID: 36732274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Acoustic differences, listener expectations, and the perceptual accommodation of talker variability.
Magnuson JS; Nusbaum HC
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Apr; 33(2):391-409. PubMed ID: 17469975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Varying acoustic-phonemic ambiguity reveals that talker normalization is obligatory in speech processing.
Choi JY; Hu ER; Perrachione TK
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Apr; 80(3):784-797. PubMed ID: 29417449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Coding of the speech spectrum in three time-varying sinusoids.
Remez RE; Rubin PE; Pisoni DB
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1983; 405():485-9. PubMed ID: 6575670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effects of talker familiarity on spoken word identification in younger and older listeners.
Yonan CA; Sommers MS
Psychol Aging; 2000 Mar; 15(1):88-99. PubMed ID: 10755292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE
Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Talker-specific learning in speech perception.
Nygaard LC; Pisoni DB
Percept Psychophys; 1998 Apr; 60(3):355-76. PubMed ID: 9599989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Perceptual learning of multiple talkers requires additional exposure.
Luthra S; Mechtenberg H; Myers EB
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Jul; 83(5):2217-2228. PubMed ID: 33754298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
