These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9180409)

  • 1. An in vivo study of a clinical surfactant used with poly(vinyl siloxane) impression materials.
    Millar BJ; Dunne SM; Robinson PB
    Quintessence Int; 1996 Oct; 27(10):707-9. PubMed ID: 9180409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An in vitro study of a surface wetting agent for addition reaction silicone impressions.
    Robinson PB; Dunne SM; Millar BJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 1994 Apr; 71(4):390-3. PubMed ID: 8196005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hydrophilic poly(vinyl siloxane) impression materials: dimensional accuracy, wettability, and effect on gypsum hardness.
    Panichuttra R; Jones RM; Goodacre C; Munoz CA; Moore BK
    Int J Prosthodont; 1991; 4(3):240-8. PubMed ID: 1810315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Wettability of nonaqueous elastomeric impression materials.
    Chai JY; Yeung TC
    Int J Prosthodont; 1991; 4(6):555-60. PubMed ID: 1817528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of a surface wetting agent on void formation in impressions.
    Millar BJ; Dunne SM; Robinson PB
    J Prosthet Dent; 1997 Jan; 77(1):54-6. PubMed ID: 9029466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fine detail reproduction of very high viscosity poly(vinyl siloxane) impression materials.
    Chee WW; Donovan TE
    Int J Prosthodont; 1989; 2(4):368-70. PubMed ID: 2700631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinically relevant mechanical properties of elastomeric impression materials.
    Chai J; Takahashi Y; Lautenschlager EP
    Int J Prosthodont; 1998; 11(3):219-23. PubMed ID: 9728115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of three wetting agents used to facilitate the pouring of dies.
    Millar BJ; Dunne SM; Nesbit M
    J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Oct; 74(4):341-4. PubMed ID: 8531149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Interaction of gloves and rubber dam with a poly(vinyl siloxane) impression material: a screening test.
    Kahn RL; Donovan TE; Chee WW
    Int J Prosthodont; 1989; 2(4):342-6. PubMed ID: 2638846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The influence of temperature on the dimensional stability of poly (vinyl siloxane) impression materials.
    Chew CL; Chee WW; Donovan TE
    Int J Prosthodont; 1993; 6(6):528-32. PubMed ID: 8148022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Antimicrobial effect of 4 disinfectants on alginate, polyether, and polyvinyl siloxane impression materials.
    Al-Jabrah O; Al-Shumailan Y; Al-Rashdan M
    Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(3):299-307. PubMed ID: 17580464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dimensional stability of impression materials immersed in an iodophor disinfectant.
    Giblin J; Podesta R; White J
    Int J Prosthodont; 1990; 3(1):72-7. PubMed ID: 2372368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Selected characteristics of a new polyvinyl siloxane impression material--a randomized clinical trial.
    Blatz MB; Sadan A; Burgess JO; Mercante D; Hoist S
    Quintessence Int; 2005 Feb; 36(2):97-104. PubMed ID: 15732545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A clinical comparison of two vinyl polysiloxane impression materials using the one-step technique.
    Raigrodski AJ; Dogan S; Mancl LA; Heindl H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Sep; 102(3):179-86. PubMed ID: 19703625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of 3 medicaments on the dimensional accuracy and surface detail reproduction of polyvinyl siloxane impressions.
    O'Mahony A; Spencer P; Williams K; Corcoran J
    Quintessence Int; 2000 Mar; 31(3):201-6. PubMed ID: 11203927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of surfactant on surface hardness of dental stone and investment casts produced from polyvinyl siloxane duplicating materials.
    Al-Johani A; Clark RK; Juszczyk AS; Radford DR
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2008 Jun; 16(2):77-80. PubMed ID: 18637383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quality of impressions using hydrophilic polyvinyl siloxane in a clinical study of 249 patients.
    Beier US; Grunert I; Kulmer S; Dumfahrt H
    Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(3):270-4. PubMed ID: 17580459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Three-dimensional assessment of dental casts' occlusal surfaces using two impression materials.
    Tarawneh FM; Panos PG; Athanasiou AE
    J Oral Rehabil; 2008 Nov; 35(11):821-6. PubMed ID: 18482343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pressure generated on a simulated oral analog by impression materials in custom trays of different designs.
    Masri R; Driscoll CF; Burkhardt J; Von Fraunhofer A; Romberg E
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Sep; 11(3):155-60. PubMed ID: 12237795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Surface porosity of stone casts made from vinyl polysiloxane impression materials.
    Dhuru VB; Asgharnia MK; Mayer JC; Hassan K
    Oper Dent; 1986; 11(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 3459135
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.