These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Durability of extensive Class II open-sandwich restorations with a resin-modified glass ionomer cement after 6 years. Andersson-Wenckert IE; van Dijken JW; Kieri C Am J Dent; 2004 Feb; 17(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 15241909 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Artificial secondary caries around two new F-containing restoratives. Dionysopoulos P; Kotsanos N; Papadogiannis Y; Konstantinidis A Oper Dent; 1998; 23(2):81-6. PubMed ID: 9573793 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The location of clinically diagnosed secondary caries. Mjör IA Quintessence Int; 1998 May; 29(5):313-7. PubMed ID: 9693650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Replacements of restorations in the primary and young permanent dentition. Wendt LK; Koch G; Birkhed D Swed Dent J; 1998; 22(4):149-55. PubMed ID: 9850557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Enamel remineralization on teeth adjacent to Class II glass ionomer restorations. Segura A; Donly KJ; Stratmann RG Am J Dent; 1997 Oct; 10(5):247-50. PubMed ID: 9522700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A clinical comparison of glass ionomer, resin-modified glass ionomer and resin composite restorations in the treatment of cervical caries in xerostomic head and neck radiation patients. McComb D; Erickson RL; Maxymiw WG; Wood RE Oper Dent; 2002; 27(5):430-7. PubMed ID: 12216559 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. In vitro caries inhibition effects by conventional and resin-modified glass-ionomer restorations. Tam LE; Chan GP; Yim D Oper Dent; 1997; 22(1):4-14. PubMed ID: 9227122 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical evaluation of glass-ionomer tunnel restorations in primary molars: 36 months results. Markovic D; Peric T Aust Dent J; 2008 Mar; 53(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 18304240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Partial caries removal and cariostatic materials in carious primary molar teeth: a randomised controlled clinical trial. Foley J; Evans D; Blackwell A Br Dent J; 2004 Dec; 197(11):697-701; discussion 689. PubMed ID: 15592552 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Placement and replacement of restorations by selected practitioners. McIntyre J Aust Dent J; 2005 Sep; 50(3):214; author reply 215. PubMed ID: 16238223 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Placement and replacement of restorations by selected practitioners. Knight GM; Craig GG Aust Dent J; 2005 Sep; 50(3):215; author reply 215. PubMed ID: 16238225 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Restoration longevity and analysis of reasons for the placement and replacement of restorations provided by vocational dental practitioners and their trainers in the United Kingdom. Burke FJ; Cheung SW; Mjör IA; Wilson NH Quintessence Int; 1999 Apr; 30(4):234-42. PubMed ID: 10635250 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]