These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9180492)

  • 1. Microbial colonization of closed-system suction catheters used in liver transplant patients.
    Adams DH; Hughes M; Elliott TS
    Intensive Crit Care Nurs; 1997 Apr; 13(2):72-6. PubMed ID: 9180492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Incidence of colonization, nosocomial pneumonia, and mortality in critically ill patients using a Trach Care closed-suction system versus an open-suction system: prospective, randomized study.
    Deppe SA; Kelly JW; Thoi LL; Chudy JH; Longfield RN; Ducey JP; Truwit CL; Antopol MR
    Crit Care Med; 1990 Dec; 18(12):1389-93. PubMed ID: 2245613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Methodologic issues associated with secretion weight as a dependent variable in research using closed-system suction catheters.
    Steuer JD; Stone KS; Nickel J; Steinfeld Y
    Nurs Res; 2000; 49(5):295-9. PubMed ID: 11009125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prolonged application of closed in-line suction catheters increases microbial colonization of the lower respiratory tract and bacterial growth on catheter surface.
    Freytag CC; Thies FL; König W; Welte T
    Infection; 2003 Jan; 31(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 12590330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Open and closed endotracheal suction systems in mechanically ventilated intensive care patients: a meta-analysis.
    Jongerden IP; Rovers MM; Grypdonck MH; Bonten MJ
    Crit Care Med; 2007 Jan; 35(1):260-70. PubMed ID: 17133187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Experimental contamination of a closed endotracheal suction system: 24 h vs 72 h.
    Meyer E; Schuhmacher M; Ebner W; Dettenkofer M
    Infection; 2009 Feb; 37(1):49-51. PubMed ID: 18974929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Contamination of a multiple-use suction catheter in a closed-circuit system compared to contamination of a disposable, single-use suction catheter.
    Ritz R; Scott LR; Coyle MB; Pierson DJ
    Respir Care; 1986 Nov; 31(11):1086-91. PubMed ID: 10315714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Contamination of multi-use closed tracheal suction catheters: an in-vitro study.
    Webb CH; Hogg GM
    J Hosp Infect; 1995 Nov; 31(3):219-24. PubMed ID: 8586791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A prospective, randomized comparison of an in-line heat moisture exchange filter and heated wire humidifiers: rates of ventilator-associated early-onset (community-acquired) or late-onset (hospital-acquired) pneumonia and incidence of endotracheal tube occlusion.
    Kirton OC; DeHaven B; Morgan J; Morejon O; Civetta J
    Chest; 1997 Oct; 112(4):1055-9. PubMed ID: 9377917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Closed versus open endotracheal suctioning: costs and physiologic consequences.
    Johnson KL; Kearney PA; Johnson SB; Niblett JB; MacMillan NL; McClain RE
    Crit Care Med; 1994 Apr; 22(4):658-66. PubMed ID: 8143475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Indications for the use of closed endotracheal suction. Artificial respiration with high positive end-expiratory pressure].
    Weitl J; Bettstetter H
    Anaesthesist; 1994 Jun; 43(6):359-63. PubMed ID: 8048770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Physiological responses to endotracheal and oral suctioning in paediatric patients: the influence of endotracheal tube sizes and suction pressures.
    Singh NC; Kissoon N; Frewen T; Tiffin N
    Clin Intensive Care; 1991; 2(6):345-50. PubMed ID: 10149098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An open-labelled randomized controlled trial comparing costs and clinical outcomes of open endotracheal suctioning with closed endotracheal suctioning in mechanically ventilated medical intensive care patients.
    David D; Samuel P; David T; Keshava SN; Irodi A; Peter JV
    J Crit Care; 2011 Oct; 26(5):482-488. PubMed ID: 21106340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ventilator-associated pneumonia using a closed versus an open tracheal suction system.
    Lorente L; Lecuona M; Martín MM; García C; Mora ML; Sierra A
    Crit Care Med; 2005 Jan; 33(1):115-9. PubMed ID: 15644657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Exposure to reprocessed single-use tracheal suction catheter and ventilator-associated pneumonia risk: A preliminary, single unit-based, matched case-control study.
    Gutiérrez JM; Millare PA; Al-Shenqiti YA; Enaya AA
    J Crit Care; 2016 Apr; 32():145-51. PubMed ID: 26775186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A needleless closed system device (CLAVE) protects from intravascular catheter tip and hub colonization: a prospective randomized study.
    Bouza E; Muñoz P; López-Rodríguez J; Jesús Pérez M; Rincón C; Martín Rabadán P; Sánchez C; Bastida E
    J Hosp Infect; 2003 Aug; 54(4):279-87. PubMed ID: 12919758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mechanical ventilation with or without daily changes of in-line suction catheters.
    Kollef MH; Prentice D; Shapiro SD; Fraser VJ; Silver P; Trovillion E; Weilitz P; von Harz B; St John R
    Am J Respir Crit Care Med; 1997 Aug; 156(2 Pt 1):466-72. PubMed ID: 9279225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Overcoming the problem of residual microbial contamination in dental suction units left by conventional disinfection using novel single component suction handpieces in combination with automated flood disinfection.
    Boyle MA; O'Donnell MJ; Russell RJ; Galvin N; Swan J; Coleman DC
    J Dent; 2015 Oct; 43(10):1268-79. PubMed ID: 26248229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of the effect of closed versus open endotracheal suction systems on the development of ventilator-associated pneumonia.
    Topeli A; Harmanci A; Cetinkaya Y; Akdeniz S; Unal S
    J Hosp Infect; 2004 Sep; 58(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 15350708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of the Feasibility and Safety of Nasotracheal Suctioning With Curved Edge Catheter Versus Conventional Suction Catheter in Critically Ill Subjects: A Prospective Randomized Crossover Trial.
    Grigoriadis KΕ; Angouras DC; Flevari A; Xathos T
    Respir Care; 2015 Dec; 60(12):1826-33. PubMed ID: 26487746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.