These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9180657)

  • 1. Comment on physical activity.
    Tsakok AD
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1997 May; 50(5):631. PubMed ID: 9180657
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Considerations for the design and analysis of experimental studies in physical activity and exercise promotion: advantages of the randomised controlled trial.
    Tai SS; Iliffe S
    Br J Sports Med; 2000 Jun; 34(3):220-4. PubMed ID: 10854027
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Another comment on the role of statistical methods.
    Cox DR
    Phys Ther; 2001 Aug; 81(8):1469. PubMed ID: 11512546
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Strength training: single versus multiple sets.
    Byrd R; Chandler TJ; Conley MS; Fry AC; Haff GG; Koch A; Hatfield F; Kirksey KB; McBride J; McBride T; Newton H; OBryant HS; Stone MH; Pierce KC; Plisk S; Ritchie-Stone M; Wathen D
    Sports Med; 1999 Jun; 27(6):409-16. PubMed ID: 10418075
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Physical activity and cognitive function in Alzheimer disease.
    Mortimer JA
    JAMA; 2009 Jan; 301(3):272-3; author reply 273-4. PubMed ID: 19155450
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. 'Everything works': the need to address confirmation bias in evaluations of drug misuse prevention interventions for adolescents.
    Gorman DM
    Addiction; 2015 Oct; 110(10):1539-40. PubMed ID: 26038149
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Missing data in rheumatologic studies and the practical reality of modern approaches to the analysis of incomplete subject data: comment on the article by Baron et al and the editorial by Boers.
    Steele R; Hudson M
    Arthritis Rheum; 2008 Sep; 59(9):1367-8. PubMed ID: 18759312
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Doing more than just acknowledging attrition at follow-up: a comment on Lu, Cheng, and Chen (2013).
    Amireault S
    Psychol Rep; 2014 Oct; 115(2):419-26. PubMed ID: 25153848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Getting the Right Answer: Four Statistical Principles.
    Sainani KL
    PM R; 2017 Sep; 9(9):933-937. PubMed ID: 28895858
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Selected recent studies of exercise, energy metabolism, body weight, and blood lipids relevant to interpretation and design of studies of exercise and cancer.
    Rogers AE
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 1992; 322():239-45. PubMed ID: 1442298
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Statistical analysis of single-subject designs.
    Janosky JE; Al-shboul Q
    Phys Ther; 1995 Feb; 75(2):157-8. PubMed ID: 7846136
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Modeling and research on research.
    Ioannidis JP
    Clin Chem; 2014 Sep; 60(9):1238-9. PubMed ID: 25037936
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In defense of P values: comment on the statistical methods actually used by ecologists.
    Stanton-Geddes J; de Freitas CG; Dambros Cde S
    Ecology; 2014 Mar; 95(3):637-42. PubMed ID: 24804446
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cardiovascular health and physical activity in older adults: an integrative review of research methodology and results.
    Houde SC; Melillo KD
    J Adv Nurs; 2002 May; 38(3):219-34. PubMed ID: 11972658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Is Propensity Score Analysis a Valid Surrogate of Randomization for the Avoidance of Allocation Bias?
    Torres F; Ríos J; Saez-Peñataro J; Pontes C
    Semin Liver Dis; 2017 Aug; 37(3):275-286. PubMed ID: 28847037
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interpretation of tests of heterogeneity and bias in meta-analysis.
    Ioannidis JP
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2008 Oct; 14(5):951-7. PubMed ID: 19018930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sample size and power.
    Whitney JD
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 1999 Nov; 26(6):314. PubMed ID: 10865617
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comment on: Granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and sucralfate in prevention of radiation-induced mucositis: a prospective randomized study.
    Kilic D; Akcali Z
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2001 Aug; 50(5):1373-4. PubMed ID: 11503611
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. On stratification, minimization and protection against types 1 and 2 error.
    Bracken MB
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2001 Jan; 54(1):104-5. PubMed ID: 11246516
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Discussion: 'Assessing physical fitness' by Heimmel et al.
    Willers DM; Tse G; Allsworth JE; Rutledge BS; Kovnar S
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Jun; 196(6):e1-4; discussion 610-1. PubMed ID: 17547864
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.