These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9180864)

  • 1. [Imaging of breast neoplasms].
    Gilles R; Calafat JF; Tristant H
    Bull Cancer; 1997 Jan; 84(1):77-82. PubMed ID: 9180864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of local recurrences in breast cancer.
    Krämer S; Schulz-Wendtland R; Hagedorn K; Bautz W; Lang N
    Anticancer Res; 1998; 18(3C):2159-61. PubMed ID: 9703776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Power Doppler bolsters breast tumor evaluations.
    Teh W
    Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1999 Mar; 21(3):67-71, 73. PubMed ID: 10351115
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Breast imaging: mammograms still rule.
    Harv Womens Health Watch; 2000 Jun; 7(10):5-6. PubMed ID: 10810062
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Good mammography finds postop cancer recurrence.
    Sadowsky NL; Semine A
    Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1990 Oct; 12(10):100-6. PubMed ID: 10149375
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Breast imaging case of the day. Recurrent infiltrating ductal carcinoma and radiation-induced dystrophic calcifications.
    Parker CP; Kalisher L
    Radiographics; 1997; 17(4):1011-3. PubMed ID: 9225400
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The challenge of imaging dense breast parenchyma: is magnetic resonance mammography the technique of choice? A comparative study with x-ray mammography and whole-breast ultrasound.
    Pediconi F; Catalano C; Roselli A; Dominelli V; Cagioli S; Karatasiou A; Pronio A; Kirchin MA; Passariello R
    Invest Radiol; 2009 Jul; 44(7):412-21. PubMed ID: 19448554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Role of MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) versus conventional imaging for breast cancer presurgical staging in young women or with dense breast.
    Biglia N; Bounous VE; Martincich L; Panuccio E; Liberale V; Ottino L; Ponzone R; Sismondi P
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2011 Mar; 37(3):199-204. PubMed ID: 21237612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Emerging techniques and molecular imaging in breast cancer.
    Yang WT
    Semin Ultrasound CT MR; 2011 Aug; 32(4):288-99. PubMed ID: 21782119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Characterization of breast lesions with CE-MR multimodal morphological and kinetic analysis: comparison with conventional mammography and high-resolution ultrasound.
    Vassiou K; Kanavou T; Vlychou M; Poultsidi A; Athanasiou E; Arvanitis DL; Fezoulidis IV
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Apr; 70(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 18295425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Role of imaging in diagnosis of carcinoma of breast.
    Ahmed R; Ali SM
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2005 Apr; 15(4):238-41. PubMed ID: 15857599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Isolated breast involvement at recurrence in a child with T-cell lymphomas.
    Köksal Y; Akyüz C; Demirkazik F; Erdogan E; Varan A; Büyükpamukçu M
    Breast J; 2007; 13(1):97-8. PubMed ID: 17214805
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Magnetic resonance imaging: the evolution of breast imaging.
    Heywang-Köbrunner SH; Hacker A; Sedlacek S
    Breast; 2013 Aug; 22 Suppl 2():S77-82. PubMed ID: 24074797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Scintimammography (SMM) in breast cancer patients.
    Mangkharak J
    J Med Assoc Thai; 1999 Mar; 82(3):242-9. PubMed ID: 10410478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Methodological features of magnetic resonance imaging mammography].
    Kulakov VI; Panov VO; Volobuev AI; Rudneva TV; Stashuk GA
    Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 2006; (1):4-18. PubMed ID: 17195628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fusion of magnetic resonance and scintimammography images for breast cancer evaluation: a pilot study.
    Duarte GM; Cabello C; Torresan RZ; Alvarenga M; Telles GH; Bianchessi ST; Caserta N; Segala SR; de Lima Mda C; Etchebehere EC; Camargo EE; Tinois E
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Oct; 14(10):2903-10. PubMed ID: 17632758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Incorporating new imaging models in breast cancer management.
    Reddy DH; Mendelson EB
    Curr Treat Options Oncol; 2005 Mar; 6(2):135-45. PubMed ID: 15717995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The role of breast MRI in planning the surgical treatment of breast cancer.
    Duygulu G; Oktay A; Bilgen IG; Kapkaç M; Zekioğlu O
    Diagn Interv Radiol; 2012; 18(5):460-7. PubMed ID: 22581712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Contrast-enhanced MR mammography for evaluation of the contralateral breast in patients with diagnosed unilateral breast cancer or high-risk lesions.
    Pediconi F; Catalano C; Roselli A; Padula S; Altomari F; Moriconi E; Pronio AM; Kirchin MA; Passariello R
    Radiology; 2007 Jun; 243(3):670-80. PubMed ID: 17446524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Differential radiation diagnosis of microcalcinates grouped in breast].
    Kharchenko VP; Rozhkova NI; Frolov IM; Burdina II; Budanova MV; Smirnov MA
    Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 1997; (4):13-7. PubMed ID: 9289899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.