295 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9181243)
21. Economic analysis of reprocessing single-use medical devices: a systematic literature review.
Jacobs P; Polisena J; Hailey D; Lafferty S
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2008 Apr; 29(4):297-301. PubMed ID: 18462140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of a reusable double-channel sphincterotome.
Lee RM; Vida F; Kozarek RA; Raltz SL; Ball TJ; Patterson DJ; Brandabur JJ; Gluck M; Tomas A; Sumida SE; Irizarry D; Jane C
Gastrointest Endosc; 1999 Apr; 49(4 Pt 1):477-82. PubMed ID: 10202062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Biopsy forceps: disposable or reusable?
Muscarella LF
Gastroenterol Nurs; 2001; 24(2):64-8. PubMed ID: 11847729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Health technology assessment on reprocessing single-use catheters for cardiac electrophysiology: results of a three-years study.
Tessarolo F; Disertori M; Caola I; Guarrera GM; Favaretti C; Nollo G
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2007; 2007():1758-61. PubMed ID: 18002317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Reuse of Single-Use Devices in Endourology: A Review.
Ghorai RP; Kumar R
J Endourol; 2024 Jan; 38(1):68-76. PubMed ID: 37885229
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. [Reuse of single-use catheters: a dilemma to be clarified].
Milandri M; Saviotti M
G Ital Cardiol; 1994 Oct; 24(10):1175-86. PubMed ID: 7835548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Reach the bottom line on reuse. Weights and balances.
Mater Manag Health Care; 1997 May; 6(5):40, 42. PubMed ID: 10167495
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Cost-effective laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Slater M; Booth MI; Dehn TC
Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2009 Nov; 91(8):670-2. PubMed ID: 19785946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Reuse of disposable medical products.
Healthc Hazard Mater Manage; 1996 Oct; 10(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 10162038
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. If it is reusable, why not reuse it?
Belkin NL
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2002 Jul; 23(7):357-8. PubMed ID: 12138970
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Reuse of single-use only devices.
Miner N
Biomed Instrum Technol; 1999; 33(1):5-6. PubMed ID: 10067175
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Recycling of cardiopulmonary bypass cannulae: a risk-benefit analysis.
Novick RJ
Can J Surg; 1993 Oct; 36(5):431-4. PubMed ID: 8221399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Reuse of single-use devices. A program model.
Reichert M
Nurs Clin North Am; 1993 Sep; 28(3):697-709. PubMed ID: 8367334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Reuse of single-use devices.
Schröer P
Med Device Technol; 2000 Dec; 11(10):44, 48-53. PubMed ID: 11200156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Reuse of disposable catheters and guide wires.
Ravin CE; Koehler PR
Radiology; 1977 Mar; 122(3):577-9. PubMed ID: 841092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Reusable instruments are more cost-effective than disposable instruments for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Apelgren KN; Blank ML; Slomski CA; Hadjis NS
Surg Endosc; 1994 Jan; 8(1):32-4. PubMed ID: 8153862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Advantages of disposable endoscopic accessories.
Petersen BT
Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am; 2000 Apr; 10(2):341-8. PubMed ID: 10683219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Reuse of disposables: let's not embrace waste.
Turi ZG
Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1996 Jun; 38(2):133-4. PubMed ID: 8776513
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Reprocessing disposables: one strategy to balance cost reduction and quality patient care.
English N
Todays Surg Nurse; 1996; 18(4):23-6. PubMed ID: 8991726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Reprocessing and reuse of single-use medical devices used during hemodynamic procedures in Brazil: a widespread and largely overlooked problem.
Amarante JM; Toscano CM; Pearson ML; Roth V; Jarvis WR; Levin AS
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2008 Sep; 29(9):854-8. PubMed ID: 18647118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
