86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9181302)
1. Automatic correction of the interfering effect of unsuppressed interspersed repetitive sequences in comparative genomic hybridization analysis.
Kirchhoff M; Gerdes T; Maahr J; Rose H; Lundsteen C
Cytometry; 1997 Jun; 28(2):130-4. PubMed ID: 9181302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Detection of chromosomal gains and losses in comparative genomic hybridization analysis based on standard reference intervals.
Kirchhoff M; Gerdes T; Rose H; Maahr J; Ottesen AM; Lundsteen C
Cytometry; 1998 Mar; 31(3):163-73. PubMed ID: 9515715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. CGHPRO -- a comprehensive data analysis tool for array CGH.
Chen W; Erdogan F; Ropers HH; Lenzner S; Ullmann R
BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Apr; 6():85. PubMed ID: 15807904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. High resolution analysis of DNA copy number variation using comparative genomic hybridization to microarrays.
Pinkel D; Segraves R; Sudar D; Clark S; Poole I; Kowbel D; Collins C; Kuo WL; Chen C; Zhai Y; Dairkee SH; Ljung BM; Gray JW; Albertson DG
Nat Genet; 1998 Oct; 20(2):207-11. PubMed ID: 9771718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Automatic detection of stable and unstable chromosome aberrations visualized by three-color imaging after fluorescence in situ hybridization with a painting and a pancentromeric DNA probe.
Coco-Martin JM; Lolkus M; Ottenheim CP; Oomen LC; Blommestijn GJ; Begg AC
Cytometry; 1998 Aug; 32(4):327-36. PubMed ID: 9701402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of fluorescein isothiocyanate- and Texas red-conjugated nucleotides for direct labeling in comparative genomic hybridization.
Larramendy ML; El-Rifai W; Knuutila S
Cytometry; 1998 Mar; 31(3):174-9. PubMed ID: 9515716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Computer image analysis of comparative genomic hybridization.
Piper J; Rutovitz D; Sudar D; Kallioniemi A; Kallioniemi OP; Waldman FM; Gray JW; Pinkel D
Cytometry; 1995 Jan; 19(1):10-26. PubMed ID: 7705181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Whole-comparative genomic hybridization in domestic sheep (Ovis aries) breeds.
Dávila-Rodríguez MI; Cortés-Gutiérrez EI; López-Fernández C; Pita M; Mezzanotte R; Gosálvez J
Cytogenet Genome Res; 2009; 124(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 19372665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of comparative genomic hybridization with conventional karyotype and classical fluorescence in situ hybridization for prenatal and postnatal diagnosis of unbalanced chromosome abnormalities.
Lapierre JM; Cacheux V; Collot N; Da Silva F; Hervy N; Rivet D; Romana S; Wiss J; Benzaken B; Aurias A; Tachdjian G
Ann Genet; 1998; 41(3):133-40. PubMed ID: 9833066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Supernumerary ring chromosome in a Bednar tumor (pigmented dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans) is composed of interspersed sequences from chromosomes 17 and 22: a fluorescence in situ hybridization and comparative genomic hybridization analysis.
Nishio J; Iwasaki H; Ishiguro M; Ohjimi Y; Yo S; Isayama T; Naito M; Kikuchi M
Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 2001 Mar; 30(3):305-9. PubMed ID: 11170290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Identification of the origin of marker chromosome by comparative genomic hybridization].
Zhou L; Wu LQ; Liang DS; Pan Q; Long ZG; Dai HP; Li J; Cai F; Xia K; Xia JH
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2007 Apr; 32(2):264-7. PubMed ID: 17478934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Normalization of multicolor fluorescence in situ hybridization (M-FISH) images for improving color karyotyping.
Wang YP; Castleman KR
Cytometry A; 2005 Apr; 64(2):101-9. PubMed ID: 15729736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Semiautomated DNA probe mapping using digital imaging microscopy: I. System development.
Mascio LN; Verbeek PW; Sudar D; Kuo WL; Gray JW
Cytometry; 1995 Jan; 19(1):51-9. PubMed ID: 7705185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Karyotyping of comparative genomic hybridization human metaphases using kernel nearest-neighbor algorithm.
Yu K; Ji L
Cytometry; 2002 Aug; 48(4):202-8. PubMed ID: 12210144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The distribution of repetitive DNAs along chromosomes in plants revealed by self-genomic in situ hybridization.
She C; Liu J; Diao Y; Hu Z; Song Y
J Genet Genomics; 2007 May; 34(5):437-48. PubMed ID: 17560530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Comparative genomic hybridization. Methodologic features].
García JL; Gutiérrez NC; Hernández JM; Sánchez MA; González MB; Arroyo JL; San Miguel JF
Sangre (Barc); 1999 Aug; 44(4):291-6. PubMed ID: 10589281
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Four-color CGH: a new method for quality control of comparative genomic hybridization.
Karhu R; Rummukainen J; Lörch T; Isola J
Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 1999 Feb; 24(2):112-8. PubMed ID: 9885977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Efficacy of high-resolution comparative genomic hybridization (HR-CGH) in detection of chromosomal abnormalities in children with acute leukaemia.
Vranova V; Mentzlova D; Oltova A; Linkova V; Zezulkova D; Filkova H; Mendelova D; Sterba J; Kuglik P
Neoplasma; 2008; 55(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 18190236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Analysis of ameloblastomas by comparative genomic hybridization and fluorescence in situ hybridization.
Toida M; Balázs M; Treszl A; Rákosy Z; Kato K; Yamazaki Y; Matsui T; Suwa T; Hatakeyama D; Makita H; Mori S; Yamashita T; Shibata T; Adány R
Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 2005 Jun; 159(2):99-104. PubMed ID: 15899380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cytogenetical diagnosis in paraffin-embedded fetoplacental tissue using comparative genomic hybridization.
Ozcan T; Burki N; Parkash V; Huang X; Pejovic T; Mahoney MJ; Ward DC
Prenat Diagn; 2000 Jan; 20(1):41-4. PubMed ID: 10701850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
