These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9181417)

  • 21. Woman-centred care during pregnancy and birth in Ireland: thematic analysis of women's and clinicians' experiences.
    Hunter A; Devane D; Houghton C; Grealish A; Tully A; Smith V
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2017 Sep; 17(1):322. PubMed ID: 28946844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The effectiveness of a Chinese midwives' antenatal clinic service on childbirth outcomes for primipare: a randomised controlled trial.
    Gu C; Wu X; Ding Y; Zhu X; Zhang Z
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2013 Dec; 50(12):1689-97. PubMed ID: 23735597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Sociological aspects of attenders and non-attenders of antenatal classes.
    Hutton JD; Boyle K; Lyman J; Ellis J
    N Z Med J; 1982 Mar; 95(703):143-5. PubMed ID: 6952123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Losing women along the path to safe motherhood: why is there such a gap between women's use of antenatal care and skilled birth attendance? A mixed methods study in northern Uganda.
    Anastasi E; Borchert M; Campbell OM; Sondorp E; Kaducu F; Hill O; Okeng D; Odong VN; Lange IL
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2015 Nov; 15():287. PubMed ID: 26538084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Continuity of care in maternity services: women's views of one team midwifery scheme.
    Farquhar M; Camilleri-Ferrante C; Todd C
    Midwifery; 2000 Mar; 16(1):35-47. PubMed ID: 11139860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.
    MacKinnon K; Marcellus L; Rivers J; Gordon C; Ryan M; Butcher D
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Jan; 13(1):14-26. PubMed ID: 26447004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Health-service utilization by pregnant women in the greater Mafikeng-Mmabatho district.
    Pretorius CF; Greeff M
    Curationis; 2004 Mar; 27(1):72-81. PubMed ID: 15168627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The antenatal care debate.
    Baldo MH
    East Mediterr Health J; 2001 Nov; 7(6):1046-55. PubMed ID: 15332747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Focused antenatal care utilization and associated factors in Debre Tabor Town, northwest Ethiopia, 2017.
    Ayalew TW; Nigatu AM
    BMC Res Notes; 2018 Nov; 11(1):819. PubMed ID: 30445991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. An evaluation of the effectiveness of an educational programme promoting the introduction of routine antenatal enquiry for domestic violence.
    Salmon D; Murphy S; Baird K; Price S
    Midwifery; 2006 Mar; 22(1):6-14. PubMed ID: 16246470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Norwegian nurse-midwives' perspectives on the provision of antenatal diabetes care in an outpatient setting: A qualitative study.
    Risa CF; Friberg F; Lidèn E
    Women Birth; 2015 Jun; 28(2):e1-6. PubMed ID: 25703284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Young Aboriginal women's voices on pregnancy care: factors encouraging antenatal engagement.
    Reibel T; Morrison L; Griffin D; Chapman L; Woods H
    Women Birth; 2015 Mar; 28(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 25740194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. How optimal caseload midwifery can modify predictors for preterm birth in young women: Integrated findings from a mixed methods study.
    Allen J; Kildea S; Stapleton H
    Midwifery; 2016 Oct; 41():30-38. PubMed ID: 27498186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Qualitative study of evidence based leaflets in maternity care.
    Stapleton H; Kirkham M; Thomas G
    BMJ; 2002 Mar; 324(7338):639. PubMed ID: 11895821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. To see or not to see? Midwives' perceptions of reduced antenatal attendances for 'low-risk' women.
    Sanders J; Somerset M; Jewell D; Sharp D
    Midwifery; 1999 Dec; 15(4):257-63. PubMed ID: 11216259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Women's views on partnership working with midwives during pregnancy and childbirth.
    Boyle S; Thomas H; Brooks F
    Midwifery; 2016 Jan; 32():21-9. PubMed ID: 26597110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Supporting choice and control? Communication and interaction between midwives and women at the antenatal booking visit.
    McCourt C
    Soc Sci Med; 2006 Mar; 62(6):1307-18. PubMed ID: 16126316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Midwives' perspectives of their ability to promote the oral health of pregnant women in Victoria, Australia.
    Heilbrunn-Lang AY; de Silva AM; Lang G; George A; Ridge A; Johnson M; Bhole S; Gilmour C
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2015 May; 15():110. PubMed ID: 25943399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Women's experiences of, and attitudes to, maternity education across the perinatal period in Victoria, Australia: A mixed-methods approach.
    Buultjens M; Murphy G; Robinson P; Milgrom J; Monfries M
    Women Birth; 2017 Oct; 30(5):406-414. PubMed ID: 28389170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Space for human connection in antenatal education: Uncovering women's hopes using Participatory Action Research.
    Brady V; Lalor J
    Midwifery; 2017 Dec; 55():7-14. PubMed ID: 28888838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.