These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
11. Ministers move to limit genome patents. Charles D; Coghlan A New Sci; 1992 Mar; 133(1812):9. PubMed ID: 16044589 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Patents in a genetic age. Bobrow M; Thomas S Nature; 2001 Feb; 409(6822):763-4. PubMed ID: 11236975 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Patentability of genetic inventions in animals. Moufang R IIC Int Rev Ind Prop Copyr Law; 1989; 20(6):823-46. PubMed ID: 11650905 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Should genes be patented? The gene patenting controversy: legal, ethical, and policy foundations of an international agreement. Looney B Law Policy Int Bus; 1994; 26(1):231-72. PubMed ID: 11979605 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Intellectual property protection for plant-related inventions in Europe. Fleck B; Baldock C Nat Rev Genet; 2003 Oct; 4(10):834-8. PubMed ID: 14526379 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Patents, but no cure. Schweiger T Splice Life; 1998; 4(5):12-3. PubMed ID: 11657659 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Intellectual property. U.S. Court opens door to free trade in ideas. Malakoff D Science; 2003 Sep; 301(5640):1643. PubMed ID: 14500946 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The gene patenting controversy: a convergence of law, economic interests, and ethics. Kevles DJ; Berkowitz A Brooklyn Law Rev; 2001; 67(1):233-48. PubMed ID: 12645549 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Is it right or is it useful? Patenting of the human gene, Lockean property rights, and the erosion of the imago Dei. Cunningham PC Ethics Med; 2003; 19(2):85-98. PubMed ID: 15025114 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Licensed to sell the stuff of life. Coghlan A New Sci; 1995 Feb; 145(1964):12-3. PubMed ID: 11656390 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]