179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9183068)
1. Long-term effects of Class II correction in Herbst and Bass therapy.
Omblus J; Malmgren O; Pancherz H; Hägg U; Hansen K
Eur J Orthod; 1997 Apr; 19(2):185-93. PubMed ID: 9183068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Class II correction in Herbst and Bass therapy.
Pancherz H; Malmgren O; Hägg U; Omblus J; Hansen K
Eur J Orthod; 1989 Feb; 11(1):17-30. PubMed ID: 2714389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Post-treatment effects of the Herbst appliance. A radiographic, clinical and biometric investigation.
Hansen K
Swed Dent J Suppl; 1992; 88():1-49. PubMed ID: 1492308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Long-term dentoskeletal changes with the Bionator, Herbst, Twin Block, and MARA functional appliances.
Siara-Olds NJ; Pangrazio-Kulbersh V; Berger J; Bayirli B
Angle Orthod; 2010 Jan; 80(1):18-29. PubMed ID: 19852635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of treatment with the Bass appliance on skeletal Class II malocclusions: a cephalometric investigation.
Cura N; Saraç M
Eur J Orthod; 1997 Dec; 19(6):691-702. PubMed ID: 9458602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of 2 comprehensive Class II treatment protocols including the bonded Herbst and headgear appliances: a double-blind study of consecutively treated patients at puberty.
Baccetti T; Franchi L; Stahl F
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jun; 135(6):698.e1-10; discussion 698-9. PubMed ID: 19524823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A cephalometric and tomographic evaluation of Herbst treatment in the mixed dentition.
Croft RS; Buschang PH; English JD; Meyer R
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Oct; 116(4):435-43. PubMed ID: 10511673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Stability of Class II treatment with an edgewise crowned Herbst appliance in the early mixed dentition: Skeletal and dental changes.
Wigal TG; Dischinger T; Martin C; Razmus T; Gunel E; Ngan P
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Aug; 140(2):210-23. PubMed ID: 21803259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cephalometric study of Class II Division 1 patients treated with an extended-duration, reinforced, banded Herbst appliance followed by fixed appliances.
Tomblyn T; Rogers M; Andrews L; Martin C; Tremont T; Gunel E; Ngan P
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Nov; 150(5):818-830. PubMed ID: 27871709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Treatment of Class II malocclusions with the Jasper Jumper appliance--a preliminary report.
Weiland FJ; Bantleon HP
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Oct; 108(4):341-50. PubMed ID: 7572845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Maxillary molar distalization or mandibular enhancement: a cephalometric comparison of comprehensive orthodontic treatment including the pendulum and the Herbst appliances.
Burkhardt DR; McNamara JA; Baccetti T
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Feb; 123(2):108-16. PubMed ID: 12594414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Treatment effects of the edgewise Herbst appliance: a cephalometric and tomographic investigation.
VanLaecken R; Martin CA; Dischinger T; Razmus T; Ngan P
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Nov; 130(5):582-93. PubMed ID: 17110255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Long-term effects of the Herbst appliance in relation to the treatment growth period: a cephalometric study.
Hansen K; Pancherz H; Hägg U
Eur J Orthod; 1991 Dec; 13(6):471-81. PubMed ID: 1817073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Initial and late treatment effects of headgear-Herbst appliance with mandibular step-by-step advancement.
Hägg U; Du X; Rabie AB
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Nov; 122(5):477-85. PubMed ID: 12439475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Long-term effects of the Herbst appliance on the dental arches and arch relationships: a biometric study.
Hansen K; Iemamnueisuk P; Pancherz H
Br J Orthod; 1995 May; 22(2):123-34. PubMed ID: 7640251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dentoskeletal effects of Twin Block and Herbst appliances in patients with Class II division 1 mandibular retrognathy.
Baysal A; Uysal T
Eur J Orthod; 2014 Apr; 36(2):164-72. PubMed ID: 24663007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cephalometric analysis of changes produced by a modified Herbst appliance in the treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusion.
Sidhu MS; Kharbanda OP; Sidhu SS
Br J Orthod; 1995 Feb; 22(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 7786859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mechanisms of Class II correction induced by the crown Herbst appliance as a single-phase Class II therapy: 1 year follow-up.
Jakobsone G; Latkauskiene D; McNamara JA
Prog Orthod; 2013 Sep; 14():27. PubMed ID: 24326090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparative study of sagittal correction with the Herbst appliance in two different ethnic groups.
Wong GW; So LL; Hägg U
Eur J Orthod; 1997 Apr; 19(2):195-204. PubMed ID: 9183069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of the Herbst appliance in growing orthodontic patients with different underlying vertical patterns.
Deen E; Woods MG
Aust Orthod J; 2015 May; 31(1):59-68. PubMed ID: 26219148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
