These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9183069)

  • 21. Stepwise advancement Herbst appliance versus mandibular sagittal split osteotomy. Treatment effects and long-term stability of adult Class II patients.
    Chaiyongsirisern A; Rabie AB; Wong RW
    Angle Orthod; 2009 Nov; 79(6):1084-94. PubMed ID: 19852598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A comparison of the skeletal, dental, and soft tissue effects caused by herbst and mandibular protraction appliances in the treatment of mandibular Class II malocclusions.
    Alves PF; Oliveira AG
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(1):e1-19. PubMed ID: 19641760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Mini-implants and the efficiency of Herbst treatment: a preliminary study.
    Luzi C; Luzi V; Melsen B
    Prog Orthod; 2013 Jul; 14():21. PubMed ID: 24325903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Class II correction in patients treated with class II elastics and with fixed functional appliances: a comparative study.
    Nelson B; Hansen K; Hägg U
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Aug; 118(2):142-9. PubMed ID: 10935954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Initial and late treatment effects of headgear-Herbst appliance with mandibular step-by-step advancement.
    Hägg U; Du X; Rabie AB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Nov; 122(5):477-85. PubMed ID: 12439475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Herbst Appliance fixed-functional appliance Class II skeletal malocclusion.
    Rondeau B
    J Gen Orthod; 2001; 12(3):7-17. PubMed ID: 11692451
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effects of headgear Herbst and mandibular step-by-step advancement versus conventional Herbst appliance and maximal jumping of the mandible.
    Du X; Hägg U; Rabie AB
    Eur J Orthod; 2002 Apr; 24(2):167-74. PubMed ID: 12001553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Long-term dentoskeletal changes with the Bionator, Herbst, Twin Block, and MARA functional appliances.
    Siara-Olds NJ; Pangrazio-Kulbersh V; Berger J; Bayirli B
    Angle Orthod; 2010 Jan; 80(1):18-29. PubMed ID: 19852635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Treatment of skeletal class II malocclusion in adults: stepwise vs single-step advancement with the Herbst appliance.
    Purkayastha SK; Rabie AB; Wong R
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(3):233-43. PubMed ID: 18834006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Dentoskeletal effects during Herbst-Multibracket appliance treatment: a comparison of lingual and labial approaches.
    Bock NC; Ruf S; Wiechmann D; Jilek T
    Eur J Orthod; 2016 Oct; 38(5):470-7. PubMed ID: 26378084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Treatment effects of twin-block and mandibular protraction appliance-IV in the correction of class II malocclusion.
    Jena AK; Duggal R
    Angle Orthod; 2010 May; 80(3):485-91. PubMed ID: 20050741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A cephalometric and tomographic evaluation of Herbst treatment in the mixed dentition.
    Croft RS; Buschang PH; English JD; Meyer R
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Oct; 116(4):435-43. PubMed ID: 10511673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effectiveness of incremental vs maximum bite advancement during Herbst appliance therapy in late adolescent and young adult patients.
    Amuk NG; Baysal A; Coskun R; Kurt G
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Jan; 155(1):48-56. PubMed ID: 30591165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Herbst plus Lingual versus Herbst plus Labial: a comparison of occlusal outcome and gingival health.
    Bock NC; Ruf S; Wiechmann D; Jilek T
    Eur J Orthod; 2016 Oct; 38(5):478-84. PubMed ID: 27141935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Orthognathic surgery and dentofacial orthopedics in adult Class II Division 1 treatment: mandibular sagittal split osteotomy versus Herbst appliance.
    Ruf S; Pancherz H
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Aug; 126(2):140-52; quiz 254-5. PubMed ID: 15316468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Herbst appliance with skeletal anchorage versus dental anchorage in adolescents with Class II malocclusion: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
    Batista KBDSL; Lima T; Palomares N; Carvalho FA; Quintão C; Miguel JAM; Lin YL; Su TL; O'Brien K
    Trials; 2017 Nov; 18(1):564. PubMed ID: 29178932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Herbst treatment with mandibular cast splints--revisited.
    El-Fateh T; Ruf S
    Angle Orthod; 2011 Sep; 81(5):820-7. PubMed ID: 21446867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A protocol for improved stability with Herbst appliance treatment for adults.
    Austin DF; Chaiyongsirisern A; Yang Y; Wong RW; Rabie AB
    Prog Orthod; 2010; 11(2):151-6. PubMed ID: 20974452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The mechanism of Class II correction in Herbst appliance treatment. A cephalometric investigation.
    Pancherz H
    Am J Orthod; 1982 Aug; 82(2):104-13. PubMed ID: 6961781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effects of the reciprocal mini-chin cup appliance.
    Aslan BI; Dinçer M
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Feb; 30(1):80-8. PubMed ID: 18276929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.