These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9183072)

  • 1. A post-treatment evaluation of multibonded ceramic brackets in orthodontics.
    Artun J
    Eur J Orthod; 1997 Apr; 19(2):219-28. PubMed ID: 9183072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ceramic bracket bonding: a comparison of shear, tensile, and torsional bond strengths of ceramic brackets.
    Merrill SW; Oesterle LJ; Hermesch CB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Sep; 106(3):290-7. PubMed ID: 8074094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The use of debonding pliers in the removal of ceramic brackets: force levels and enamel cracks.
    Bishara SE; Fonseca JM; Boyer DB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Sep; 108(3):242-8. PubMed ID: 7661139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Shear bond strength of ceramic brackets with chemical or mechanical retention.
    Forsberg CM; Hagberg C
    Br J Orthod; 1992 Aug; 19(3):183-9. PubMed ID: 1390574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bond strength: a comparison between chemical coated and mechanical interlock bases of ceramic and metal brackets.
    Wang WN; Meng CL; Tarng TH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Apr; 111(4):374-81. PubMed ID: 9109582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An in vitro evaluation of a metal reinforced orthodontic ceramic bracket.
    Mundstock KS; Sadowsky PL; Lacefield W; Bae S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Dec; 116(6):635-41. PubMed ID: 10587597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of the bond strength of different bracket-bonding systems to bovine enamel.
    Nkenke E; Hirschfelder U; Martus P; Eberhard H
    Eur J Orthod; 1997 Jun; 19(3):259-70. PubMed ID: 9239956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fabrication and evaluation of Bis-GMA/TEGDMA resin with various amounts of silane-coated silica for orthodontic use.
    Durrani OK; Bashir U; Arshad N
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Feb; 34(1):62-6. PubMed ID: 21292732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The extent of enamel surface fractures. A quantitative comparison of thermally debonded ceramic and mechanically debonded metal brackets by energy dispersive micro- and image-analysis.
    Stratmann U; Schaarschmidt K; Wegener H; Ehmer U
    Eur J Orthod; 1996 Dec; 18(6):655-62. PubMed ID: 9009430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Thermal debonding of ceramic brackets: an in vitro study.
    Crooks M; Hood J; Harkness M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Feb; 111(2):163-72. PubMed ID: 9057616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Laboratory evaluation of a compomer and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement for orthodontic bonding.
    Millett DT; Cattanach D; McFadzean R; Pattison J; McColl J
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Feb; 69(1):58-63; discussion 64. PubMed ID: 10022186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative evaluation of ceramic bracket base designs.
    Bordeaux JM; Moore RN; Bagby MD
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Jun; 105(6):552-60. PubMed ID: 8198079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In vitro comparison of the retention capacity of new aesthetic brackets.
    Fernandez L; Canut JA
    Eur J Orthod; 1999 Feb; 21(1):71-7. PubMed ID: 10191580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bond strengths of orthodontic brackets to restorative resin composite surfaces.
    Lai PY; Woods MG; Tyas MJ
    Aust Orthod J; 1999 Apr; 15(4):235-45. PubMed ID: 11933358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Torsional bond strength and failure pattern of ceramic brackets bonded to composite resin laminate veneers.
    Kao EC; Eliades T; Rezvan E; Johnston WM
    Eur J Orthod; 1995 Dec; 17(6):533-40. PubMed ID: 8682171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ceramic bracket debonding: the evaluation of two debonding techniques and their effect on enamel.
    Amditis C
    Aust Orthod J; 1994 Mar; 13(2):80-5. PubMed ID: 7993241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Shear bond strength of ceramic orthodontic brackets to enamel.
    Britton JC; McInnes P; Weinberg R; Ledoux WR; Retief DH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1990 Oct; 98(4):348-53. PubMed ID: 2145756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fracture strengths of ceramic brackets subjected to mesial-distal archwire tipping forces.
    Rhodes RK; Duncanson MG; Nanda RS; Currier GF
    Angle Orthod; 1992; 62(1):67-76. PubMed ID: 1554165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Shear/peel bond strength of repositioned ceramic brackets.
    Gaffey PG; Major PW; Glover K; Grace M; Koehler JR
    Angle Orthod; 1995; 65(5):351-7. PubMed ID: 8526294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The force levels required to mechanically debond ceramic brackets: an in vitro comparative study.
    Arici S; Minors C
    Eur J Orthod; 2000 Jun; 22(3):327-34. PubMed ID: 10920565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.