These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Britain's failure to tackle research misconduct: UK bodies are now working together to set up panel on misconduct. Lowe GD; Murray GD; Finlayson ND BMJ; 2004 Jan; 328(7433):229-30. PubMed ID: 14739207 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Fraud and misconduct in medical research. Lock S Med Leg J; 1996; 64 ( Pt 4)():139-52. PubMed ID: 9050300 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. GMC drops case against man accused of submitting incorrect data about heart device to medical journal. Dyer C BMJ; 2012 Nov; 345():e7391. PubMed ID: 23118310 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Reasons for striking off paediatric gastroenterologist may have been "inadequate," GMC admits. Dyer C BMJ; 2012 Feb; 344():e1244. PubMed ID: 22344526 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Lawyers scuttle hopes of international court for fraudulent science. Eur Heart J; 2014 Feb; 35(5):259-60. PubMed ID: 24645185 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Plans for research watchdog praised, but it may lack teeth. Giles J Nature; 2005 Mar; 434(7031):263. PubMed ID: 15772618 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. On thwarting the seeds of scientific fraud. Sobel BE Coron Artery Dis; 2012 Dec; 23(8):560-2. PubMed ID: 23032630 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. UK must learn from US's mistakes in tackling research misconduct. Dyer C BMJ; 2007 May; 334(7602):1027. PubMed ID: 17510135 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Dealing with research misconduct in the United Kingdom. An American perspective on research integrity. Rennie D BMJ; 1998 Jun; 316(7146):1726-8. PubMed ID: 9614029 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Using criminalization and due process to reduce scientific misconduct. Sovacool BK Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(5):W1-7. PubMed ID: 16179287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Medical council to investigate alleged research fraud. Dyer O BMJ; 2002 Sep; 325(7363):509. PubMed ID: 12217981 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Defence of cardiologist in misconduct case. Union defence should not always apply. Wolfson M BMJ; 1997 Oct; 315(7114):1021. PubMed ID: 9365324 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Rights to due process in instances of possible scientific misconduct. Hallum JV; Hadley SW Endocrinology; 1991 Feb; 128(2):643-4. PubMed ID: 1989853 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Fourth Amendment restrictions on scientific misconduct proceedings at public universities. Spece RG; Marchalonis JJ Health Matrix Clevel; 2001; 11(2):571-626. PubMed ID: 11683049 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Defence of cardiologist in misconduct case. Members of Medical Defence Union are entitled to help with defamation cases. Saunders M BMJ; 1997 Oct; 315(7114):1021. PubMed ID: 9365325 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Due process in investigations of research misconduct. Mello MM; Brennan TA N Engl J Med; 2003 Sep; 349(13):1280-6. PubMed ID: 14507953 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]