BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9183262)

  • 1. Energy consumption in children with myelomeningocele: a comparison between reciprocating gait orthosis and hip-knee-ankle-foot orthosis ambulators.
    Cuddeford TJ; Freeling RP; Thomas SS; Aiona MD; Rex D; Sirolli H; Elliott J; Magnusson M
    Dev Med Child Neurol; 1997 Apr; 39(4):239-42. PubMed ID: 9183262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Longitudinal assessment of oxygen cost and velocity in children with myelomeningocele: comparison of the hip-knee-ankle-foot orthosis and the reciprocating gait orthosis.
    Thomas SS; Buckon CE; Melchionni J; Magnusson M; Aiona MD
    J Pediatr Orthop; 2001; 21(6):798-803. PubMed ID: 11675558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative study of conventional hip-knee-ankle-foot orthoses versus reciprocating-gait orthoses for children with high-level paraparesis.
    Katz DE; Haideri N; Song K; Wyrick P
    J Pediatr Orthop; 1997; 17(3):377-86. PubMed ID: 9150029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of the quality of life in individuals with spinal cord injury wearing either reciprocating gait orthosis or hip knee ankle foot orthosis: a cross-sectional study.
    Barati K; Kamyab M; Kamali M
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2021 Aug; 16(6):562-566. PubMed ID: 32188322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The reciprocating gait orthosis in myelomeningocele.
    Yngve DA; Douglas R; Roberts JM
    J Pediatr Orthop; 1984 May; 4(3):304-10. PubMed ID: 6736234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reciprocating orthoses for children with myelomeningocele. A comparison of two types.
    Phillips DL; Field RE; Broughton NS; Menelaus MB
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1995 Jan; 77(1):110-3. PubMed ID: 7822365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The physiological cost index of walking with mechanical and powered gait orthosis in patients with spinal cord injury.
    Arazpour M; Bani MA; Hutchins SW; Jones RK
    Spinal Cord; 2013 May; 51(5):356-9. PubMed ID: 23247013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Independent ambulators with high sacral myelomeningocele: the relation between walking kinematics and energy consumption.
    Bare A; Vankoski SJ; Dias L; Danduran M; Boas S
    Dev Med Child Neurol; 2001 Jan; 43(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 11201417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of Orthotic Gait Training with Isocentric Reciprocating Gait Orthosis on Walking in Children with Myelomeningocele.
    Arazpour M; Soleimani F; Sajedi F; Vameghi R; Bani MA; Gharib M; Samadian M
    Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil; 2017; 23(2):147-154. PubMed ID: 29339891
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Parawalker: energy cost of walking.
    Banta JV; Bell KJ; Muik EA; Fezio J
    Eur J Pediatr Surg; 1991 Dec; 1 Suppl 1():7-10. PubMed ID: 1807396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of paraplegic gait performance using two types of reciprocating gait orthoses.
    Winchester PK; Carollo JJ; Parekh RN; Lutz LM; Aston JW
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1993 Aug; 17(2):101-6. PubMed ID: 8233765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of ankle-foot orthoses on walking efficiency and gait in children with cerebral palsy.
    Brehm MA; Harlaar J; Schwartz M
    J Rehabil Med; 2008 Jul; 40(7):529-34. PubMed ID: 18758669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Orthotic compensation for non-functioning hip extensors.
    Ogilvie C; Messenger N; Bowker P; Rowley DI
    Z Kinderchir; 1988 Dec; 43 Suppl 2():33-5. PubMed ID: 3213248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Gait evaluation of the advanced reciprocating gait orthosis with solid versus dorsi flexion assist ankle foot orthoses in paraplegic patients.
    Bani MA; Arazpour M; Ghomshe FT; Mousavi ME; Hutchins SW
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2013 Apr; 37(2):161-7. PubMed ID: 22988045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of stance control orthoses on gait characteristics and energy expenditure in knee-ankle-foot orthosis users.
    Davis PC; Bach TM; Pereira DM
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2010 Jun; 34(2):206-15. PubMed ID: 20470059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Modeling effects of sagittal-plane hip joint stiffness on reciprocating gait orthosis-assisted gait.
    Johnson WB; Fatone S; Gard SA
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2013; 50(10):1449-56. PubMed ID: 24699979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Energy consumption in paraplegic ambulation using the reciprocating gait orthosis and electric stimulation of the thigh muscles.
    Hirokawa S; Grimm M; Le T; Solomonow M; Baratta RV; Shoji H; D'Ambrosia RD
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1990 Aug; 71(9):687-94. PubMed ID: 2375676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The efficacy of the floor-reaction ankle-foot orthosis in children with cerebral palsy.
    Rogozinski BM; Davids JR; Davis RB; Jameson GG; Blackhurst DW
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2009 Oct; 91(10):2440-7. PubMed ID: 19797580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of gait between healthy participants and persons with spinal cord injury when using the advanced reciprocating gait orthosis.
    Arazpour M; Joghtaei M; Bahramizadeh M; Ahmadi Bani M; Hutchins SW; Curran S; Mousavi ME; Sharifi G; Mardani MA
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2016 Apr; 40(2):287-93. PubMed ID: 26195620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of three ankle-foot orthosis configurations for children with spastic hemiplegia.
    Buckon CE; Thomas SS; Jakobson-Huston S; Sussman M; Aiona M
    Dev Med Child Neurol; 2001 Jun; 43(6):371-8. PubMed ID: 11409825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.