258 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9184457)
1. Stump-socket interface pressure as an aid to socket design in prostheses for trans-femoral amputees--a preliminary study.
Lee VS; Solomonidis SE; Spence WD
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 1997; 211(2):167-80. PubMed ID: 9184457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Relationship between socket pressure and EMG of two muscles in trans-femoral stumps during gait.
Hong JH; Mun MS
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2005 Apr; 29(1):59-72. PubMed ID: 16180378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Pressure characteristics at the stump/socket interface in transtibial amputees using an adaptive prosthetic foot.
Wolf SI; Alimusaj M; Fradet L; Siegel J; Braatz F
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2009 Dec; 24(10):860-5. PubMed ID: 19744755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Conventional patellar-tendon-bearing (PTB) socket/stump interface dynamic pressure distributions recorded during the prosthetic stance phase of gait of a trans-tibial amputee.
Convery P; Buis AW
Prosthet Orthot Int; 1998 Dec; 22(3):193-8. PubMed ID: 9881607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative study between patellar-tendon-bearing and pressure cast prosthetic sockets.
Goh JC; Lee PV; Chong SY
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2004 May; 41(3B):491-501. PubMed ID: 15543467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quantitative analysis of interface pressures in transfemoral prosthetic sockets.
Paternò L; Truppa L; Ibrahimi M; Rosini E; Gruppioni E; Ricotti L; Menciassi A
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2024 Apr; 48(2):176-183. PubMed ID: 37379468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Transfemoral sockets with vacuum-assisted suspension comparison of hip kinematics, socket position, contact pressure, and preference: ischial containment versus brimless.
Kahle JT; Highsmith MJ
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2013; 50(9):1241-52. PubMed ID: 24458964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An experimental study of the interface pressure profile during level walking of a new suspension system for lower limb amputees.
Eshraghi A; Abu Osman NA; Gholizadeh H; Ali S; Sævarsson SK; Wan Abas WA
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2013 Jan; 28(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 23157843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Stump/socket pressure profiles of the pressure cast prosthetic socket.
Goh JC; Lee PV; Chong SY
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2003 Mar; 18(3):237-43. PubMed ID: 12620787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Socket/stump interface dynamic pressure distributions recorded during the prosthetic stance phase of gait of a trans-tibial amputee wearing a hydrocast socket.
Convery P; Buis AW
Prosthet Orthot Int; 1999 Aug; 23(2):107-12. PubMed ID: 10493137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of different types of sockets on the range of motion of the hip joint by the transfemoral amputee.
Klotz R; Colobert B; Botino M; Permentiers I
Ann Phys Rehabil Med; 2011 Oct; 54(7):399-410. PubMed ID: 21996548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A photoelastic clinical study of the static load distribution at the stump/socket interface of PTB sockets.
Sewell P; Vinney J; Noroozi S; Amali R; Andrews S
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2005 Dec; 29(3):291-302. PubMed ID: 16466158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Measurement of biomechanical interactions at the stump-socket interface in lower limb prostheses.
Noll V; Wojtusch J; Schuy J; Grimmer M; Beckerle P; Rinderknecht S
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2015 Aug; 2015():5517-20. PubMed ID: 26737541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical investigation of the pressure and shear stress on the trans-tibial stump with a prosthesis.
Zhang M; Turner-Smith AR; Tanner A; Roberts VC
Med Eng Phys; 1998 Apr; 20(3):188-98. PubMed ID: 9690489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of Ischial Containment and Subischial Sockets Effect on Gait Biomechanics in People With Transfemoral Amputation: A Randomized Crossover Trial.
Fatone S; Stine R; Caldwell R; Angelico J; Gard SA; Oros M; Major MJ
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2022 Aug; 103(8):1515-1523. PubMed ID: 35296398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Interface pressures during ambulation using suction and vacuum-assisted prosthetic sockets.
Beil TL; Street GM; Covey SJ
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2002; 39(6):693-700. PubMed ID: 17943671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of prosthesis alignment on pressure distribution at the stump/socket interface in transtibial amputees during unsupported stance and gait.
Seelen HA; Anemaat S; Janssen HM; Deckers JH
Clin Rehabil; 2003 Nov; 17(7):787-96. PubMed ID: 14606747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of fluid insert volume changes on socket pressures and shear stresses: case studies from two trans-tibial amputee subjects.
Sanders JE; Jacobsen AK; Fergason JR
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2006 Dec; 30(3):257-69. PubMed ID: 17162516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Gait, cost and time implications for changing from PTB to ICEX sockets.
Datta D; Harris I; Heller B; Howitt J; Martin R
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2004 Aug; 28(2):115-20. PubMed ID: 15382805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An Investigation of Pressure Profiles and Wearer Comfort During Walking With a Transtibial Hydrocast Socket.
Laing S; Lythgo N; Lavranos J; Lee PVS
Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2019 Mar; 98(3):199-206. PubMed ID: 30222605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
