257 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9184457)
21. Techniques for Interface Stress Measurements within Prosthetic Sockets of Transtibial Amputees: A Review of the Past 50 Years of Research.
Al-Fakih EA; Abu Osman NA; Mahmad Adikan FR
Sensors (Basel); 2016 Jul; 16(7):. PubMed ID: 27447646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Analysis of lower limb prosthetic socket interface based on stress and motion measurements.
Tang J; Jiang L; McGrath M; Bader D; Laszczak P; Moser D; Zahedi S
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2022 Sep; 236(9):1349-1356. PubMed ID: 35821656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A comparison of pressure distributions between two types of sockets in a bulbous stump.
Gholizadeh H; Abu Osman NA; Eshraghi A; Arifin N; Chung TY
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2016 Aug; 40(4):509-16. PubMed ID: 25583929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Interface pressure profile analysis for patellar tendon-bearing socket and hydrostatic socket.
Moo EK; Osman NA; Pingguan-Murphy B; Abas WA; Spence WD; Solomonidis SE
Acta Bioeng Biomech; 2009; 11(4):37-43. PubMed ID: 20405814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Energy cost of walking in transfemoral amputees: Comparison between Marlo Anatomical Socket and Ischial Containment Socket.
Traballesi M; Delussu AS; Averna T; Pellegrini R; Paradisi F; Brunelli S
Gait Posture; 2011 Jun; 34(2):270-4. PubMed ID: 21684165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Dynamic interface pressure distributions of two transtibial prosthetic socket concepts.
Dumbleton T; Buis AW; McFadyen A; McHugh BF; McKay G; Murray KD; Sexton S
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2009; 46(3):405-15. PubMed ID: 19675992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Pressure distribution at the stump/socket interface in transtibial amputees during walking on stairs, slope and non-flat road.
Dou P; Jia X; Suo S; Wang R; Zhang M
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Dec; 21(10):1067-73. PubMed ID: 16919376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Individual responses to alignment perturbations in socket reaction moments while walking in transtibial prostheses.
Kobayashi T; Orendurff MS; Zhang M; Boone DA
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2014 May; 29(5):590-4. PubMed ID: 24792233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A Scoping Review of Pressure Measurements in Prosthetic Sockets of Transfemoral Amputees during Ambulation: Key Considerations for Sensor Design.
Ko ST; Asplund F; Zeybek B
Sensors (Basel); 2021 Jul; 21(15):. PubMed ID: 34372253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Walking in a vacuum-assisted socket shifts the stump fluid balance.
Goswami J; Lynn R; Street G; Harlander M
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2003 Aug; 27(2):107-13. PubMed ID: 14571940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Finite element analysis of donning procedure of a prosthetic transfemoral socket.
Lacroix D; Patiño JF
Ann Biomed Eng; 2011 Dec; 39(12):2972-83. PubMed ID: 21887588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The CAT-CAM socket and quadrilateral socket: a comparison of energy cost during ambulation.
Gailey RS; Lawrence D; Burditt C; Spyropoulos P; Newell C; Nash MS
Prosthet Orthot Int; 1993 Aug; 17(2):95-100. PubMed ID: 8233775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Static and dynamic pressure profiles of a patellar-tendon-bearing (PTB) socket.
Goh JC; Lee PV; Chong SY
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2003; 217(2):121-6. PubMed ID: 12666779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Piezoelectric bimorphs' characteristics as in-socket sensors for transfemoral amputees.
El-Sayed AM; Hamzaid NA; Abu Osman NA
Sensors (Basel); 2014 Dec; 14(12):23724-41. PubMed ID: 25513823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Clinical investigation of the interface pressure in the trans-tibial socket with Dermo and Seal-In X5 liner during walking and their effect on patient satisfaction.
Ali S; Osman NA; Mortaza N; Eshraghi A; Gholizadeh H; Wan Abas WA
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2012 Nov; 27(9):943-8. PubMed ID: 22795863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Gait analysis and tissue-socket interface pressures in above-knee amputees.
Leavitt LA; Zuniga EN; Calvert JC; Canzoneri J; Peterson CR
South Med J; 1972 Oct; 65(10):1197-207. PubMed ID: 5074091
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Development of a residuum/socket interface simulator for lower limb prosthetics.
McGrath MP; Gao J; Tang J; Laszczak P; Jiang L; Bader D; Moser D; Zahedi S
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2017 Mar; 231(3):235-242. PubMed ID: 28164748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Effect of prosthetic alignment changes on socket reaction moment impulse during walking in transtibial amputees.
Kobayashi T; Orendurff MS; Arabian AK; Rosenbaum-Chou TG; Boone DA
J Biomech; 2014 Apr; 47(6):1315-23. PubMed ID: 24612718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Effect on gait and socket comfort in unilateral trans-tibial amputees after exchange to a polyurethane concept.
Aström I; Stenström A
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2004 Apr; 28(1):28-36. PubMed ID: 15171575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Interface pressures in above-knee sockets.
Krouskop TA; Brown J; Goode B; Winningham D
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1987 Oct; 68(10):713-4. PubMed ID: 3662780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
