194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9184479)
1. Brain potentials reflect violations of gender stereotypes.
Osterhout L; Bersick M; McLaughlin J
Mem Cognit; 1997 May; 25(3):273-85. PubMed ID: 9184479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Interplay between syntax and semantics during sentence comprehension: ERP effects of combining syntactic and semantic violations.
Hagoort P
J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Aug; 15(6):883-99. PubMed ID: 14511541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Neural correlates of the implicit processing of grammatical and stereotypical gender violations: A masked and unmasked priming study.
Pesciarelli F; Scorolli C; Cacciari C
Biol Psychol; 2019 Sep; 146():107714. PubMed ID: 31185245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Neural correlates of semantic and syntactic processes in the comprehension of case marked pronouns: evidence from German and Dutch.
Lamers MJ; Jansma BM; Hammer A; Münte TF
BMC Neurosci; 2006 Mar; 7():23. PubMed ID: 16526952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comprehending pronouns: a role for word-specific gender stereotype information.
Kennison SM; Trofe JL
J Psycholinguist Res; 2003 May; 32(3):355-78. PubMed ID: 12845944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Semantics prevalence over syntax during sentence processing: a brain potential study of noun-adjective agreement in Spanish.
Martín-Loeches M; Nigbur R; Casado P; Hohlfeld A; Sommer W
Brain Res; 2006 Jun; 1093(1):178-89. PubMed ID: 16678138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Electrophysiological distinctions in processing conceptual relationships within simple sentences.
Kuperberg GR; Sitnikova T; Caplan D; Holcomb PJ
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2003 Jun; 17(1):117-29. PubMed ID: 12763198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Electrophysiological markers of prejudice related to sexual gender.
Proverbio AM; Orlandi A; Bianchi E
Neuroscience; 2017 Sep; 358():1-12. PubMed ID: 28666645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Anticipating words and their gender: an event-related brain potential study of semantic integration, gender expectancy, and gender agreement in Spanish sentence reading.
Wicha NY; Moreno EM; Kutas M
J Cogn Neurosci; 2004 Sep; 16(7):1272-88. PubMed ID: 15453979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Neural correlates of automatic beliefs about gender stereotypes: Males are more prejudicial.
Proverbio AM; Alberio A; De Benedetto F
Brain Lang; 2018 Nov; 186():8-16. PubMed ID: 30179752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The role of feature-number and feature-type in processing Hindi verb agreement violations.
Nevins A; Dillon B; Malhotra S; Phillips C
Brain Res; 2007 Aug; 1164():81-94. PubMed ID: 17658491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Syntactic gender and semantic expectancy: ERPs reveal early autonomy and late interaction.
Gunter TC; Friederici AD; Schriefers H
J Cogn Neurosci; 2000 Jul; 12(4):556-68. PubMed ID: 10936910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Interplay of meaning, syntax and working memory during pronoun resolution investigated by ERPs.
Hammer A; Jansma BM; Lamers M; Münte TF
Brain Res; 2008 Sep; 1230():177-91. PubMed ID: 18652811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The electrophysiological underpinnings of processing gender stereotypes in language.
Siyanova-Chanturia A; Pesciarelli F; Cacciari C
PLoS One; 2012; 7(12):e48712. PubMed ID: 23226494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Morphological agreement at a distance: dissociation between early and late components of the event-related brain potential.
O'Rourke PL; Van Petten C
Brain Res; 2011 May; 1392():62-79. PubMed ID: 21466794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Brain potentials and syntactic violations revisited: no evidence for specificity of the syntactic positive shift.
Münte TF; Heinze HJ; Matzke M; Wieringa BM; Johannes S
Neuropsychologia; 1998 Mar; 36(3):217-26. PubMed ID: 9622187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Norms for gender stereotypically congruent, stereotypically incongruent, semantically correct, and semantically incorrect sentences in Polish and English.
Jankowiak K; Naranowicz M; Skałba A; Drążkowski D; Pawelczyk J
PLoS One; 2024; 19(5):e0302594. PubMed ID: 38753698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cortical brain responses to semantic incongruity and syntactic violation in Italian language: an event-related potential study.
Angrilli A; Penolazzi B; Vespignani F; De Vincenzi M; Job R; Ciccarelli L; Palomba D; Stegagno L
Neurosci Lett; 2002 Mar; 322(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 11958830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Is animacy special? ERP correlates of semantic violations and animacy violations in sentence processing.
Szewczyk JM; Schriefers H
Brain Res; 2011 Jan; 1368():208-21. PubMed ID: 21029726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The role of semantics and repair processes in article-noun gender disagreement in Italian: An ERP study.
Popov S; Miceli G; Ćurčić-Blake B; Bastiaanse R
Brain Lang; 2020 Jul; 206():104787. PubMed ID: 32244057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
