These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Sources of variation in spirometric measurements. Identifying the signal and dealing with noise. Becklake MR; White N Occup Med; 1993; 8(2):241-64. PubMed ID: 8506504 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bounds on potential risks and causal risk differences under assumptions about confounding parameters. Chiba Y; Sato T; Greenland S Stat Med; 2007 Dec; 26(28):5125-35. PubMed ID: 17525935 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Definition, sources, magnitude, effect modifiers, and strategies of reduction of the healthy worker effect. Choi BC J Occup Med; 1992 Oct; 34(10):979-88. PubMed ID: 1403198 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Fundamental errors in observed researches]. Sørensen HT; Møller-Petersen J; Sabroe S; Vilstrup H Nord Med; 1994; 109(3):91-2. PubMed ID: 8139905 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Another comment on the role of statistical methods. Cox DR Phys Ther; 2001 Aug; 81(8):1469. PubMed ID: 11512546 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The language of epidemiology (XV): Biases in case-control studies. Aronson SM R I Med; 1993 Jan; 76(1):4-5. PubMed ID: 8428032 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Bias. Delgado-Rodríguez M; Llorca J J Epidemiol Community Health; 2004 Aug; 58(8):635-41. PubMed ID: 15252064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The importance of assessing confounding and effect modification in research involving periodontal disease and systemic diseases. Hyman J J Clin Periodontol; 2006 Feb; 33(2):102-3. PubMed ID: 16441732 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The controversy of significance testing: misconceptions and alternatives. Glaser DN Am J Crit Care; 1999 Sep; 8(5):291-6. PubMed ID: 10467465 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. How to design an effective research study. Kirk-Smith M Nurs Times; 1996 Jul 10-16; 92(28):40-1. PubMed ID: 8718080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A closer look at confounding. Sonis J Fam Med; 1998 Sep; 30(8):584-8. PubMed ID: 9773290 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Methods to adjust for bias and confounding in critical care health services research involving observational data. Wunsch H; Linde-Zwirble WT; Angus DC J Crit Care; 2006 Mar; 21(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 16616616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Deriving treatment recommendations from evidence within randomized trials. The role and limitation of meta-analysis. Freemantle N; Mason J; Eccles M Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 1999; 15(2):304-15. PubMed ID: 10507190 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Interaction effects and subgroup analyses in clinical trials: more than meets the eye? Sevdalis N; Jacklin R J Eval Clin Pract; 2008 Oct; 14(5):919-22. PubMed ID: 18373582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of gender of subjects and experimenter on susceptibility to motion sickness. Jokerst MD; Gatto M; Fazio R; Gianaros PJ; Stern RM; Koch KL Aviat Space Environ Med; 1999 Oct; 70(10):962-5. PubMed ID: 10519473 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sources of error in clinical research. Kumar R; Kumar S Indian Pediatr; 1996 Dec; 33(12):1029-32. PubMed ID: 9141804 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Chapter IV. The effects of respondent rules on health survey reports. Mathiowetz NA; Groves RM Vital Health Stat 2; 1987 Aug; (106):26-32. PubMed ID: 15791753 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]