These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9185947)

  • 1. Radiographic comparison of the lumbar spine for positive identification of human remains. A case report.
    Valenzuela A
    Am J Forensic Med Pathol; 1997 Jun; 18(2):215-7. PubMed ID: 9185947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Personal identification on the basis of antemortem and postmortem radiographs.
    Angyal M; Dérczy K
    J Forensic Sci; 1998 Sep; 43(5):1089-93. PubMed ID: 9729833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Anthropological and radiographic comparison of vertebrae for identification of decomposed human remains.
    Mundorff AZ; Vidoli G; Melinek J
    J Forensic Sci; 2006 Sep; 51(5):1002-4. PubMed ID: 17018076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effects of aging on the comparability of antemortem and postmortem radiographs.
    Sauer NJ; Brantley RE; Barondess DA
    J Forensic Sci; 1988 Sep; 33(5):1223-30. PubMed ID: 3193078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Automated contour detection in spine radiographs and computed tomography reconstructions for forensic comparative identification.
    Ognard J; Deloire L; Saccardy C; Burdin V; Ben Salem D
    Forensic Sci Med Pathol; 2020 Mar; 16(1):99-106. PubMed ID: 31768873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The use of thoracolumbar and hip joint dysmorphism in identification.
    Hulewicz B; Wilcher GW
    J Forensic Sci; 2003 Jul; 48(4):842-7. PubMed ID: 12877305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Radiographic human identification using bones of the hand: a validation study.
    Koot MG; Sauer NJ; Fenton TW
    J Forensic Sci; 2005 Mar; 50(2):263-8. PubMed ID: 15813535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Optical and digital techniques for enhancing radiographic anatomy for identification of human remains.
    Fitzpatrick JJ; Shook DR; Kaufman BL; Wu SJ; Kirschner RJ; MacMahon H; Levine LJ; Maples W; Charletta D
    J Forensic Sci; 1996 Nov; 41(6):947-59. PubMed ID: 8914285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [A case of positive personal identity of skeletonized remains using lumbar radiograph].
    Sakaihara M; Terazawa K
    Hokkaido Igaku Zasshi; 2002 Mar; 77(2):157-60. PubMed ID: 11968851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Forensic personal identification utilizing part-to-part comparison of CT-derived 3D lumbar models.
    Decker SJ; Ford JM
    Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Jan; 294():21-26. PubMed ID: 30445251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Identification of unknown human remains by comparison of antemortem and postmortem radiographs.
    Jablonski NG; Shum BS
    Forensic Sci Int; 1989 Aug; 42(3):221-30. PubMed ID: 2792981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Radiographic identification of fragmentary human remains from a mass disaster.
    Kahana T; Ravioli JA; Urroz CL; Hiss J
    Am J Forensic Med Pathol; 1997 Mar; 18(1):40-4. PubMed ID: 9095299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quantitative assessment of trabecular bone pattern identification.
    Kahana T; Hiss J; Smith P
    J Forensic Sci; 1998 Nov; 43(6):1144-7. PubMed ID: 9846391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Identification of decomposed human remains from radiographic comparisons of an unusual foot deformity.
    Sudimack JR; Lewis BJ; Rich J; Dean DE; Fardal PM
    J Forensic Sci; 2002 Jan; 47(1):218-20. PubMed ID: 12064658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Positive personal identity of skeletonized remains using abdominal and pelvic radiographs.
    Owsley DW; Mann RW
    J Forensic Sci; 1992 Jan; 37(1):332-6. PubMed ID: 1545209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Positive identification by means of trabecular bone pattern comparison.
    Kahana T; Hiss J
    J Forensic Sci; 1994 Sep; 39(5):1325-30. PubMed ID: 7964570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Identification of an unknown corpse by means of computed tomography (CT) of the lumbar spine.
    Riepert T; Rittner C; Ulmcke D; Ogbuihi S; Schweden F
    J Forensic Sci; 1995 Jan; 40(1):126-7. PubMed ID: 7876794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Craniofacial identification by comparison of antemortem and postmortem radiographs: two case reports dealing with burnt bodies.
    Campobasso CP; Dell'Erba AS; Belviso M; Di Vella G
    Am J Forensic Med Pathol; 2007 Jun; 28(2):182-6. PubMed ID: 17525575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The discrimination potential of amalgam restorations for identification: part 1.
    Phillips VM; Stuhlinger M
    J Forensic Odontostomatol; 2009 Jun; 27(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 22717954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Identifying skeletal remains found in a sewer.
    Goodman NR; Himmelberger LK
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2002 Nov; 133(11):1508-13. PubMed ID: 12462694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.