657 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9189004)
1. Resin-modified glass ionomer cements (RM GICs) implications for use in pediatric dentistry.
Vaikuntam J
ASDC J Dent Child; 1997; 64(2):131-4. PubMed ID: 9189004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Resin-based composites and compomers in primary molars.
García-Godoy F
Dent Clin North Am; 2000 Jul; 44(3):541-70. PubMed ID: 10925772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fluoride release and caries inhibition associated with a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement at varying fluoride loading doses.
Donly KJ; Segura A
Am J Dent; 2002 Feb; 15(1):8-10. PubMed ID: 12074234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Inhibition of artificial secondary caries in root by fluoride-releasing restorative materials.
Torii Y; Itota T; Okamoto M; Nakabo S; Nagamine M; Inoue K
Oper Dent; 2001; 26(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 11203775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Alternatives to silver amalgam and resin composite in pediatric dentistry.
Croll TP
Quintessence Int; 1998 Nov; 29(11):697-703. PubMed ID: 10200719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Glass ionomer cements in pediatric dentistry: review of the literature.
Croll TP; Nicholson JW
Pediatr Dent; 2002; 24(5):423-9. PubMed ID: 12412956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical performance and caries inhibition of resin-modified glass ionomer cement and amalgam restorations.
Donly KJ; Segura A; Kanellis M; Erickson RL
J Am Dent Assoc; 1999 Oct; 130(10):1459-66. PubMed ID: 10570589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In vitro caries inhibition effects by conventional and resin-modified glass-ionomer restorations.
Tam LE; Chan GP; Yim D
Oper Dent; 1997; 22(1):4-14. PubMed ID: 9227122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Secondary caries formation in vitro around fluoride-releasing restorations.
Dionysopoulos P; Kotsanos N; Koliniotou-Koubia ; Papagodiannis Y
Oper Dent; 1994; 19(5):183-8. PubMed ID: 8700758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Artificial formed caries-like lesions around esthetic restorative materials.
Attar N; Onen A
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2002; 26(3):289-96. PubMed ID: 11990054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Nano-ionomer tooth repair in pediatric dentistry.
Killian CM; Croll TP
Pediatr Dent; 2010; 32(7):530-5. PubMed ID: 21462767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Lateral-access Class II restoration using resin-modified glass-ionomer or silver-cermet cement.
Croll TP
Quintessence Int; 1995 Feb; 26(2):121-6. PubMed ID: 7568722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Factors influencing dentists' choice of amalgam and tooth-colored restorative materials for Class II preparations in younger patients.
Vidnes-Kopperud S; Tveit AB; Gaarden T; Sandvik L; Espelid I
Acta Odontol Scand; 2009; 67(2):74-9. PubMed ID: 19085213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Amalgam, composite resin and glass ionomer cement in Class II restorations in primary molars--a three year clinical evaluation.
Ostlund J; Möller K; Koch G
Swed Dent J; 1992; 16(3):81-6. PubMed ID: 1496459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A clinical comparison of glass ionomer, resin-modified glass ionomer and resin composite restorations in the treatment of cervical caries in xerostomic head and neck radiation patients.
McComb D; Erickson RL; Maxymiw WG; Wood RE
Oper Dent; 2002; 27(5):430-7. PubMed ID: 12216559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The continuum of restorative materials in pediatric dentistry--a review for the clinician.
Berg JH
Pediatr Dent; 1998; 20(2):93-100. PubMed ID: 9566012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Glass-ionomer cement restorations and secondary caries: a preliminary report.
Mjör IA
Quintessence Int; 1996 Mar; 27(3):171-4. PubMed ID: 9063229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Vitremer restorative cement for children: three clinicians' observations in three pediatric dental practices.
Croll TP; Helpin ML; Donly KJ
ASDC J Dent Child; 2000; 67(6):391-8, 374. PubMed ID: 11204061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Materials used to restore class II lesions in primary molars: a survey of California pediatric dentists.
Pair RL; Udin RD; Tanbonliong T
Pediatr Dent; 2004; 26(6):501-7. PubMed ID: 15646912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Minimal intervention: advanced lesions.
Mount GJ; Ngo H
Quintessence Int; 2000 Oct; 31(9):621-9. PubMed ID: 11203986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
