These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9189111)

  • 1. Long-term results of the Angelchik prosthesis for gastro-oesophageal reflux.
    Maxwell-Armstrong CA; Steele RJ; Amar SS; Evans D; Morris DL; Foster GE; Hardcastle JD
    Br J Surg; 1997 Jun; 84(6):862-4. PubMed ID: 9189111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Surgery for gastro-oesophageal reflux: the Angelchik prosthesis compared to the floppy Nissen fundoplication. Two-year follow-up study and a five-year evaluation of the Angelchik prosthesis.
    Deakin M; Mayer D; Temple JG
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1989 Jul; 71(4):249-52. PubMed ID: 2774454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Angelchik anti-reflux prosthesis and postoperative dysphagia.
    Leguit P; Hagen WB; Laarman J
    Neth J Surg; 1987 Jun; 39(3):86-9. PubMed ID: 3614751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Angelchik antireflux prosthesis: long-term clinical and technical follow-up.
    Thibault C; Marceau P; Biron S; Bourque RA; Béland L; Potvin M
    Can J Surg; 1994 Feb; 37(1):12-7. PubMed ID: 8306213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Angelchik prosthesis revisited.
    Varshney S; Kelly JJ; Branagan G; Somers SS; Kelly JM
    World J Surg; 2002 Jan; 26(1):129-33. PubMed ID: 11898046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Oesophageal transit of marshmallow after the Angelchik procedure.
    Robertson CS; Smart H; Amar SS; Morris DL
    Br J Surg; 1989 Mar; 76(3):245-7. PubMed ID: 2720319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Angelchik prosthesis for gastro-oesophageal reflux: symptomatic and objective assessment.
    Weaver RM; Temple JG
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1985 Sep; 67(5):299-302. PubMed ID: 4051424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Appraisal of the Angelchik anti-reflux prosthesis based on clinical and manometric data and pH monitoring.
    de Caestecker JS; Ross HM; Heading RC; Macleod IB
    J R Coll Surg Edinb; 1989 Feb; 34(1):9-12. PubMed ID: 2709364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An objective long-term evaluation of the Angelchik antireflux prosthesis.
    Evans DF; Robertson CS; Morris DL; Ledingham SJ; Doran J; Hardcastle JD
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1991 Nov; 73(6):355-60. PubMed ID: 1759764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [The Angelchik prosthesis in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux].
    Myrhøj T; Andersen LI; Boesby S
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1989 Mar; 151(10):627-9. PubMed ID: 2922832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Angelchik antireflux device: a 5-year experience.
    Timoney AG; Kelly JM; Welfare MR
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1990 May; 72(3):185-7. PubMed ID: 2357036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison between subjective and objective assessment of the long-term results after the Heller-Dor operation in patients affected by oesophageal achalasia.
    Mattioli S; Ruffato A; Di Simone MP; Lugaresi ML; D'Ovidio F
    Dig Liver Dis; 2006 Aug; 38(8):544-51. PubMed ID: 16569523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Complications of the Angelchik prosthesis in the management of gastroesophageal reflux.
    Kauten JR; Mansour KA
    Am Surg; 1986 Apr; 52(4):208-13. PubMed ID: 3954273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prospective study of the Angelchik anti-reflux prosthesis.
    Wale RJ; Royston CM; Bennett JR; Buckton GK
    Br J Surg; 1985 Jul; 72(7):520-4. PubMed ID: 4016530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reflux versus dysphagia: an objective evaluation of the Angelchik prosthesis.
    Morris DL; Jones J; Evans DF; Foster G; Smart H; Gregson R; Amar S; Doran J; Hardcastle JD
    Br J Surg; 1985 Dec; 72(12):1017-20. PubMed ID: 4084744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Surgery for gastro-oesophageal reflux: the Angelchik prosthesis compared to the floppy Nissen fundoplication. Two-year follow-up study and a five-year evaluation of the Angelchik prosthesis.
    Dehn TC
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1990 Jan; 72(1):69. PubMed ID: 2301909
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Long-term outcomes of revisional surgery following laparoscopic fundoplication.
    Lamb PJ; Myers JC; Jamieson GG; Thompson SK; Devitt PG; Watson DI
    Br J Surg; 2009 Apr; 96(4):391-7. PubMed ID: 19283739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Angelchik prosthesis: experience with the anti-reflux device.
    Goldberg JA; Bell G; Morrice JJ; Davidson PM
    J R Coll Surg Edinb; 1987 Aug; 32(4):205-8. PubMed ID: 3681791
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Results of a prospective randomized trial of the Angelchik prosthesis and of a consecutive series of 119 patients.
    Eyre-Brook IA; Codling BW; Gear MW
    Br J Surg; 1993 May; 80(5):602-4. PubMed ID: 8518898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [The outcomes of laparoscopic fundoplication for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Long term results].
    Dan S; Brigand C; Pierrard F; Rohr S; Meyer C
    Ann Chir; 2005 Sep; 130(8):477-82. PubMed ID: 16004958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.