201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9189273)
21. An alternate approach to constructing distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) suppression tuning curves.
Johnson TA; Neely ST; Dierking DM; Hoover BM; Gorga MP
J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Dec; 116(6):3263-6. PubMed ID: 15658675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The influence of masking on the ipsi- and contralateral brainstem evoked potential.
Knothe J; Hofmann G
Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 1985; 242(1):99-103. PubMed ID: 4038155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Studies of binaural detection in the rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) with Pavlovian conditioning.
Early SJ; Mason CR; Zheng L; Evilsizer M; Idrobo F; Harrison JM; Carney LH
Behav Neurosci; 2001 Jun; 115(3):650-60. PubMed ID: 11439454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Binaural unmasking of the accuracy of envelope-signal representation in rat auditory cortex but not auditory midbrain.
Xu N; Luo L; Wang Q; Li L
Hear Res; 2019 Jun; 377():224-233. PubMed ID: 30991272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Cortical representation of the combination of monaural and binaural unmasking.
Uppenkamp S; Uhlig CH; Verhey JL
Adv Exp Med Biol; 2013; 787():435-42. PubMed ID: 23716250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Binaural processing model based on contralateral inhibition. III. Dependence on temporal parameters.
Breebaart J; van de Par S; Kohlrausch A
J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Aug; 110(2):1105-17. PubMed ID: 11519578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Binaural masking release in children with Down syndrome.
Porter HL; Grantham DW; Ashmead DH; Tharpe AM
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(4):e134-42. PubMed ID: 24535557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Lateralization of acoustic signals by dichotically listening budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus).
Welch TE; Dent ML
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Oct; 130(4):2293-301. PubMed ID: 21973385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Detection of changes in timbre and harmonicity in complex sounds by zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata) and budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus).
Lohr B; Dooling RJ
J Comp Psychol; 1998 Mar; 112(1):36-47. PubMed ID: 9528113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Investigations of the precedence effect in budgerigars: the perceived location of auditory images.
Dent ML; Dooling RJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Apr; 113(4 Pt 1):2159-69. PubMed ID: 12703726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The Franssen effect illusion in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus) and zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata).
Dent ML; McClaine EM; Welch TE
J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Dec; 122(6):3609-14. PubMed ID: 18247768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Attention-related modulation of auditory brainstem responses during contralateral noise exposure.
Ikeda K; Sekiguchi T; Hayashi A
Neuroreport; 2008 Oct; 19(16):1593-9. PubMed ID: 18806689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Effect of trial-by-trial variation in center frequency on detection of interaural temporal and intensitive differences in bands of noise.
Grange AN; Trahiotis C
Audiol Neurootol; 1996; 1(4):220-33. PubMed ID: 9390804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The auditory spatial acuity of the domestic cat in the interaural horizontal and median vertical planes.
Martin RL; Webster WR
Hear Res; 1987; 30(2-3):239-52. PubMed ID: 3680067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Diagnosis of auditory threshold with frequency-specific recording of auditory evoked potentials: personal results and methodological aspects].
Schönweiler R; Ptok M
Laryngorhinootologie; 1995 Sep; 74(9):531-8. PubMed ID: 7495433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Modulation cues influence binaural masking-level difference in masking-pattern experiments.
Nitschmann M; Verhey JL
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Mar; 131(3):EL223-8. PubMed ID: 22423812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Signal processing in the auditory system and how it may relate to binaural hearing.
Møller AR
Scand Audiol Suppl; 1982; 15():65-79. PubMed ID: 6955928
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Effects of interaural frequency difference on binaural fusion evidenced by electrophysiological versus psychoacoustical measures.
Zhou J; Durrant JD
J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Sep; 114(3):1508-15. PubMed ID: 14514204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Masked auditory thresholds in three species of birds, as measured by the auditory brainstem response (L).
Noirot IC; Brittan-Powell EF; Dooling RJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jun; 129(6):3445-8. PubMed ID: 21682367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Subcomponent cues in binaural unmasking.
Culling JF
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jun; 129(6):3846-55. PubMed ID: 21682408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
