These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9189741)

  • 1. Buflomedil interference with the monoclonal EMIT d.a.u. amphetamine/methamphetamine immunoassay.
    Papa P; Rocchi L; Mainardi C; Donzelli G
    Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem; 1997 May; 35(5):369-70. PubMed ID: 9189741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ranitidine interference with the monoclonal EMIT d.a.u. amphetamine/methamphetamine immunoassay.
    Poklis A; Hall KV; Still J; Binder SR
    J Anal Toxicol; 1991; 15(2):101-3. PubMed ID: 2051743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analytical performance evaluation of EMIT II monoclonal amphetamine/methamphetamine assay: more specificity than EMIT d.a.u. monoclonal amphetamine/methamphetamine assay.
    Dasgupta A; Saldana S; Kinnaman G; Smith M; Johansen K
    Clin Chem; 1993 Jan; 39(1):104-8. PubMed ID: 8419030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Response of EMIT amphetamine immunoassays to urinary desoxyephedrine following Vicks inhaler use.
    Poklis A; Moore KA
    Ther Drug Monit; 1995 Feb; 17(1):89-94. PubMed ID: 7725384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. EMIT-d.a.u. monoclonal amphetamine/methamphetamine assay. I. Stereoselectivity and clinical evaluation.
    Poklis A; Hall KV; Eddleton RA; Fitzgerald RL; Saady JJ; Bogema SC
    Forensic Sci Int; 1993 Apr; 59(1):49-62. PubMed ID: 8505029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reduced interference by phenothiazines in amphetamine drug of abuse immunoassays.
    Melanson SE; Lee-Lewandrowski E; Griggs DA; Long WH; Flood JG
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2006 Dec; 130(12):1834-8. PubMed ID: 17149959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Response of the Emit II amphetamine/methamphetamine assay to specimens collected following use of Vicks inhalers.
    Poklis A; Jortani SA; Brown CS; Crooks CR
    J Anal Toxicol; 1993 Sep; 17(5):284-6. PubMed ID: 8107462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reagent lot-to-lot variability in sensitivity for amphetamine with the Syva Emit II Monoclonal Amphetamine/Methamphetamine assay.
    Singh J
    J Anal Toxicol; 1997; 21(2):174-5. PubMed ID: 9083839
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Elevated urine zinc concentration reduces the detection of methamphetamine, cocaine, THC and opiates in urine by EMIT.
    Lin CN; Strathmann FG
    J Anal Toxicol; 2013; 37(9):665-9. PubMed ID: 23843421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of the Abuscreen ONLINE assay for amphetamines on the Hitachi 737: comparison with EMIT and GC/MS methods.
    Baker DP; Murphy MS; Shepp PF; Royo VR; Caldarone ME; Escoto B; Salamone SJ
    J Forensic Sci; 1995 Jan; 40(1):108-12. PubMed ID: 7876791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. False-positive results with Emit II amphetamine/methamphetamine assay in users of common psychotropic drugs.
    Smith-Kielland A; Olsen KM; Christophersen AS
    Clin Chem; 1995 Jun; 41(6 Pt 1):951-2. PubMed ID: 7768025
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Urinary excretion of d-amphetamine following oral doses in humans: implications for urine drug testing.
    Poklis A; Still J; Slattum PW; Edinboro LF; Saady JJ; Costantino A
    J Anal Toxicol; 1998 Oct; 22(6):481-6. PubMed ID: 9788523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Methamphetamine and amphetamine isomer concentrations in human urine following controlled Vicks VapoInhaler administration.
    Smith ML; Nichols DC; Underwood P; Fuller Z; Moser MA; Flegel R; Gorelick DA; Newmeyer MN; Concheiro M; Huestis MA
    J Anal Toxicol; 2014 Oct; 38(8):524-7. PubMed ID: 25217541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of the sensitivity and specificity of six immunoassays for the detection of amphetamines in urine.
    Verstraete AG; Heyden FV
    J Anal Toxicol; 2005; 29(5):359-64. PubMed ID: 16105261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Drug screening and confirmation by GC-MS: comparison of EMIT II and Online KIMS against 10 drugs between US and England laboratories.
    Lu NT; Taylor BG
    Forensic Sci Int; 2006 Mar; 157(2-3):106-16. PubMed ID: 15899564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. EMIT-d.a.u. monoclonal amphetamine/methamphetamine assay. II. Detection of methylenedioxyamphetamine (MDA) and methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA).
    Poklis A; Fitzgerald RL; Hall KV; Saady JJ
    Forensic Sci Int; 1993 Apr; 59(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 8099337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ranitidine interference with standard amphetamine immunoassay.
    Liu L; Wheeler SE; Rymer JA; Lower D; Zona J; Peck Palmer OM; Tamama K
    Clin Chim Acta; 2015 Jan; 438():307-8. PubMed ID: 25242739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of six commercial amphetamine and methamphetamine immunoassays for cross-reactivity to phenylpropanolamine and ephedrine in urine.
    D'Nicuola J; Jones R; Levine B; Smith ML
    J Anal Toxicol; 1992; 16(4):211-3. PubMed ID: 1501473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of ephedrine, pseudoephedrine and phenylpropanolamine concentrations in human urine samples and a comparison of the specificity of DRI amphetamines and Abuscreen online (KIMS) amphetamines screening immunoassays.
    Stout PR; Klette KL; Horn CK
    J Forensic Sci; 2004 Jan; 49(1):160-4. PubMed ID: 14979364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Unavailability of drug metabolite reference material to evaluate false-positive results for monoclonal EMIT-d.a.u. assay of amphetamine.
    Poklis A
    Clin Chem; 1992 Dec; 38(12):2560. PubMed ID: 1458603
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.