These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9191426)

  • 1. Frequency of unexpected multifocal metastasis in patients with acute spinal cord compression. Evaluation by low-field MR imaging in cancer patients.
    Heldmann U; Myschetzky PS; Thomsen HS
    Acta Radiol; 1997 May; 38(3):372-5. PubMed ID: 9191426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The role of MR imaging in evaluating metastatic spinal disease.
    Smoker WR; Godersky JC; Knutzon RK; Keyes WD; Norman D; Bergman W
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1987 Dec; 149(6):1241-8. PubMed ID: 3500616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Neuroimaging and treatment implications of patients with multiple epidural spinal metastases.
    Schiff D; O'Neill BP; Wang CH; O'Fallon JR
    Cancer; 1998 Oct; 83(8):1593-601. PubMed ID: 9781953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of MR and CT myelography in imaging the cervical and thoracic spine.
    Karnaze MG; Gado MH; Sartor KJ; Hodges FJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1988 Feb; 150(2):397-403. PubMed ID: 3257332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Diagnosis of vertebral metastasis, epidural metastasis, and malignant spinal cord compression: are T(1)-weighted sagittal images sufficient?
    Kim JK; Learch TJ; Colletti PM; Lee JW; Tran SD; Terk MR
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2000 Sep; 18(7):819-24. PubMed ID: 11027875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Spinal cord compression due to metastatic disease: diagnosis with MR imaging versus myelography.
    Carmody RF; Yang PJ; Seeley GW; Seeger JF; Unger EC; Johnson JE
    Radiology; 1989 Oct; 173(1):225-9. PubMed ID: 2675185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The appearance on MRI of vertebrae in acute compression of the spinal cord due to metastases.
    Khaw FM; Worthy SA; Gibson MJ; Gholkar A
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1999 Sep; 81(5):830-4. PubMed ID: 10530845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Can recumbent magnetic resonance imaging replace myelography or computed tomography myelography for detecting lumbar spinal stenosis?
    Sasaki K; Hasegawa K; Shimoda H; Keiji I; Homma T
    Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2013 Jul; 23 Suppl 1():S77-83. PubMed ID: 23542928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Low-field MR imaging (0.1 T) in patients with clinically suspected acute spinal block.
    Heldmann U; Thomsen HS; Mygind T
    Acta Radiol; 1995 Jan; 36(1):15-8. PubMed ID: 7833163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. 0.6 T MR imaging of the cervical spine: multislice and multiecho techniques.
    Hyman RA; Edwards JH; Vacirca SJ; Stein HL
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1985; 6(2):229-36. PubMed ID: 3920881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Radiological diagnosis of chronic spinal cord compressive lesion at thoraco-lumbar junction].
    Koyanagi I; Isu T; Iwasaki Y; Akino M; Abe H; Tashiro K; Miyasaka K; Abe S; Kaneda K
    No Shinkei Geka; 1988 Oct; 16(11):1227-33. PubMed ID: 3145466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Does magnetic resonance imaging give value-added than bone scintigraphy in the detection of vertebral metastasis?
    Chiewvit P; Danchaivijitr N; Sirivitmaitrie K; Chiewvit S; Thephamongkhol K
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2009 Jun; 92(6):818-29. PubMed ID: 19530588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Vertebral metastases with high risk of symptomatic malignant spinal cord compression.
    Hamamoto Y; Kataoka M; Senba T; Uwatsu K; Sugawara Y; Inoue T; Sakai S; Aono S; Takahashi T; Oda S
    Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2009 Jul; 39(7):431-4. PubMed ID: 19429929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Magnetic resonance imaging of the whole spine in suspected malignant spinal cord compression: impact on management.
    Cook AM; Lau TN; Tomlinson MJ; Vaidya M; Wakeley CJ; Goddard P
    Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 1998; 10(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 9543614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Improved magnetic resonance myelography using image fusion].
    Eberhardt K; Ganslandt O; Stadlbauer A
    Rofo; 2013 Apr; 185(4):333-9. PubMed ID: 23348124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Magnetic resonance imaging of spinal cord syndromes.
    Gräfin von Einsiedel H; Stepan R
    Eur J Radiol; 1985 May; 5(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 3996422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Spinal cord compression caused by dual pathology: a close shave with Ockham's razor.
    Wright JF; Powell S; Williams MP
    Clin Radiol; 1988 Sep; 39(5):558-9. PubMed ID: 3180678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of myelography, CT myelography and magnetic resonance imaging in cervical spondylosis and disk herniation. Pre- and postoperative findings.
    Larsson EM; Holtås S; Cronqvist S; Brandt L
    Acta Radiol; 1989; 30(3):233-9. PubMed ID: 2736175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cervical osteochondroma as a cause of spinal cord compression in a patient with hereditary multiple exostoses: Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging findings.
    Cirak B; Karabulut N; Palaoglu S
    Australas Radiol; 2002 Sep; 46(3):309-11. PubMed ID: 12196244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A quantitative and reproducible method to assess cord compression and canal stenosis after cervical spine trauma: a study of interrater and intrarater reliability.
    Furlan JC; Fehlings MG; Massicotte EM; Aarabi B; Vaccaro AR; Bono CM; Madrazo I; Villanueva C; Grauer JN; Mikulis D
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Sep; 32(19):2083-91. PubMed ID: 17762809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.