BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9191426)

  • 1. Frequency of unexpected multifocal metastasis in patients with acute spinal cord compression. Evaluation by low-field MR imaging in cancer patients.
    Heldmann U; Myschetzky PS; Thomsen HS
    Acta Radiol; 1997 May; 38(3):372-5. PubMed ID: 9191426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The role of MR imaging in evaluating metastatic spinal disease.
    Smoker WR; Godersky JC; Knutzon RK; Keyes WD; Norman D; Bergman W
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1987 Dec; 149(6):1241-8. PubMed ID: 3500616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Neuroimaging and treatment implications of patients with multiple epidural spinal metastases.
    Schiff D; O'Neill BP; Wang CH; O'Fallon JR
    Cancer; 1998 Oct; 83(8):1593-601. PubMed ID: 9781953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of MR and CT myelography in imaging the cervical and thoracic spine.
    Karnaze MG; Gado MH; Sartor KJ; Hodges FJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1988 Feb; 150(2):397-403. PubMed ID: 3257332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Diagnosis of vertebral metastasis, epidural metastasis, and malignant spinal cord compression: are T(1)-weighted sagittal images sufficient?
    Kim JK; Learch TJ; Colletti PM; Lee JW; Tran SD; Terk MR
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2000 Sep; 18(7):819-24. PubMed ID: 11027875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Spinal cord compression due to metastatic disease: diagnosis with MR imaging versus myelography.
    Carmody RF; Yang PJ; Seeley GW; Seeger JF; Unger EC; Johnson JE
    Radiology; 1989 Oct; 173(1):225-9. PubMed ID: 2675185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The appearance on MRI of vertebrae in acute compression of the spinal cord due to metastases.
    Khaw FM; Worthy SA; Gibson MJ; Gholkar A
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1999 Sep; 81(5):830-4. PubMed ID: 10530845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Can recumbent magnetic resonance imaging replace myelography or computed tomography myelography for detecting lumbar spinal stenosis?
    Sasaki K; Hasegawa K; Shimoda H; Keiji I; Homma T
    Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2013 Jul; 23 Suppl 1():S77-83. PubMed ID: 23542928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Low-field MR imaging (0.1 T) in patients with clinically suspected acute spinal block.
    Heldmann U; Thomsen HS; Mygind T
    Acta Radiol; 1995 Jan; 36(1):15-8. PubMed ID: 7833163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. 0.6 T MR imaging of the cervical spine: multislice and multiecho techniques.
    Hyman RA; Edwards JH; Vacirca SJ; Stein HL
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1985; 6(2):229-36. PubMed ID: 3920881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Radiological diagnosis of chronic spinal cord compressive lesion at thoraco-lumbar junction].
    Koyanagi I; Isu T; Iwasaki Y; Akino M; Abe H; Tashiro K; Miyasaka K; Abe S; Kaneda K
    No Shinkei Geka; 1988 Oct; 16(11):1227-33. PubMed ID: 3145466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Does magnetic resonance imaging give value-added than bone scintigraphy in the detection of vertebral metastasis?
    Chiewvit P; Danchaivijitr N; Sirivitmaitrie K; Chiewvit S; Thephamongkhol K
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2009 Jun; 92(6):818-29. PubMed ID: 19530588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Vertebral metastases with high risk of symptomatic malignant spinal cord compression.
    Hamamoto Y; Kataoka M; Senba T; Uwatsu K; Sugawara Y; Inoue T; Sakai S; Aono S; Takahashi T; Oda S
    Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2009 Jul; 39(7):431-4. PubMed ID: 19429929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Magnetic resonance imaging of the whole spine in suspected malignant spinal cord compression: impact on management.
    Cook AM; Lau TN; Tomlinson MJ; Vaidya M; Wakeley CJ; Goddard P
    Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 1998; 10(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 9543614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Improved magnetic resonance myelography using image fusion].
    Eberhardt K; Ganslandt O; Stadlbauer A
    Rofo; 2013 Apr; 185(4):333-9. PubMed ID: 23348124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Magnetic resonance imaging of spinal cord syndromes.
    Gräfin von Einsiedel H; Stepan R
    Eur J Radiol; 1985 May; 5(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 3996422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Spinal cord compression caused by dual pathology: a close shave with Ockham's razor.
    Wright JF; Powell S; Williams MP
    Clin Radiol; 1988 Sep; 39(5):558-9. PubMed ID: 3180678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of myelography, CT myelography and magnetic resonance imaging in cervical spondylosis and disk herniation. Pre- and postoperative findings.
    Larsson EM; Holtås S; Cronqvist S; Brandt L
    Acta Radiol; 1989; 30(3):233-9. PubMed ID: 2736175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cervical osteochondroma as a cause of spinal cord compression in a patient with hereditary multiple exostoses: Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging findings.
    Cirak B; Karabulut N; Palaoglu S
    Australas Radiol; 2002 Sep; 46(3):309-11. PubMed ID: 12196244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A quantitative and reproducible method to assess cord compression and canal stenosis after cervical spine trauma: a study of interrater and intrarater reliability.
    Furlan JC; Fehlings MG; Massicotte EM; Aarabi B; Vaccaro AR; Bono CM; Madrazo I; Villanueva C; Grauer JN; Mikulis D
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Sep; 32(19):2083-91. PubMed ID: 17762809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.