219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9191457)
1. Acute ankle injuries: clinical decision rules for radiographse.
Tandeter HB; Shvartzman P
Am Fam Physician; 1997 Jun; 55(8):2721-8. PubMed ID: 9191457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of diagnostic decision rules and structured data collection in assessment of acute ankle injury.
Glas AS; Pijnenburg BA; Lijmer JG; Bogaard K; de RM; Keeman JN; Butzelaar RM; Bossuyt PM
CMAJ; 2002 Mar; 166(6):727-33. PubMed ID: 11944759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of Ottawa ankle rules and current local guidelines for use of radiography in acute ankle injuries.
Keogh SP; Shafi A; Wijetunge DB
J R Coll Surg Edinb; 1998 Oct; 43(5):341-3. PubMed ID: 9803109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prospective evaluation of the Ottawa Ankle Rules in a university sports medicine center. With a modification to increase specificity for identifying malleolar fractures.
Leddy JJ; Smolinski RJ; Lawrence J; Snyder JL; Priore RL
Am J Sports Med; 1998; 26(2):158-65. PubMed ID: 9548106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical application of the Ottawa ankle rules for the use of radiography in acute ankle injuries: an independent site assessment.
Verma S; Hamilton K; Hawkins HH; Kothari R; Singal B; Buncher R; Nguyen P; O'Neill M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Sep; 169(3):825-7. PubMed ID: 9275906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Can clinical prediction rules used in acute pediatric ankle and midfoot injuries be applied to an adult population?
Smith KR; Brown CK; Brewer KL
Am J Emerg Med; 2011 May; 29(4):441-5. PubMed ID: 21450433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Ottawa ankle rules.
Stiell I
Can Fam Physician; 1996 Mar; 42():478-80. PubMed ID: 8616287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prospective validation and head-to-head comparison of 3 ankle rules in a pediatric population.
Gravel J; Hedrei P; Grimard G; Gouin S
Ann Emerg Med; 2009 Oct; 54(4):534-540.e1. PubMed ID: 19647341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Retrospective comparison of the Low Risk Ankle Rules and the Ottawa Ankle Rules in a pediatric population.
Ellenbogen AL; Rice AL; Vyas P
Am J Emerg Med; 2017 Sep; 35(9):1262-1265. PubMed ID: 28363615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of triage-based use of the Ottawa foot and ankle rules on the number of orders for radiographic imaging.
Ashurst JV; Nappe T; Digiambattista S; Kambhampati A; Alam S; Ortiz M; Delpais P; Porter BG; Kurt A; Kane BG; Greenberg MR
J Am Osteopath Assoc; 2014 Dec; 114(12):890-7. PubMed ID: 25429079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Decision rules for the use of radiography in acute ankle injuries. Refinement and prospective validation.
Stiell IG; Greenberg GH; McKnight RD; Nair RC; McDowell I; Reardon M; Stewart JP; Maloney J
JAMA; 1993 Mar; 269(9):1127-32. PubMed ID: 8433468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Implementation of the Ottawa ankle rules.
Stiell IG; McKnight RD; Greenberg GH; McDowell I; Nair RC; Wells GA; Johns C; Worthington JR
JAMA; 1994 Mar; 271(11):827-32. PubMed ID: 8114236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Multicentre trial to introduce the Ottawa ankle rules for use of radiography in acute ankle injuries. Multicentre Ankle Rule Study Group.
Stiell I; Wells G; Laupacis A; Brison R; Verbeek R; Vandemheen K; Naylor CD
BMJ; 1995 Sep; 311(7005):594-7. PubMed ID: 7663253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of the Ottawa clinical decision rules for the use of radiography in acute ankle and midfoot injuries in the emergency department: an independent site assessment.
Pigman EC; Klug RK; Sanford S; Jolly BT
Ann Emerg Med; 1994 Jul; 24(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 7912053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Radiography in acute ankle injuries: the Ottawa Ankle Rules versus local diagnostic decision rules.
Pijnenburg AC; Glas AS; De Roos MA; Bogaard K; Lijmer JG; Bossuyt PM; Butzelaar RM; Keeman JN
Ann Emerg Med; 2002 Jun; 39(6):599-604. PubMed ID: 12023701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy of Ottawa ankle rules to exclude fractures of the ankle and mid-foot: systematic review.
Bachmann LM; Kolb E; Koller MT; Steurer J; ter Riet G
BMJ; 2003 Feb; 326(7386):417. PubMed ID: 12595378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ultrasound-assisted triage of ankle trauma can decrease the need for radiographic imaging.
Hedelin H; Goksör LÅ; Karlsson J; Stjernström S
Am J Emerg Med; 2013 Dec; 31(12):1686-9. PubMed ID: 24157071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Validation of the Ottawa ankle rules for the efficient utilization of radiographies in acute lesions of the ankle].
Aginaga Badiola JR; Ventura Huarte I; Tejera Torroja E; Huarte Sanz I; Cuende Garcés A; Gómez Garcerán M; Labaca Arteaga J
Aten Primaria; 1999 Sep; 24(4):203-8. PubMed ID: 10547910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cost-effectiveness analysis of the Ottawa Ankle Rules.
Anis AH; Stiell IG; Stewart DG; Laupacis A
Ann Emerg Med; 1995 Oct; 26(4):422-8. PubMed ID: 7574122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Use of the Ottawa Ankle Rules in children: a survey of physicians' practice patterns.
Dowling SK; Wishart I
CJEM; 2011 Sep; 13(5):333-8; E44-6. PubMed ID: 21955415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
