These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9191559)

  • 1. Comparison of two assays for measuring LDL cholesterol.
    Maitra A; Hirany SV; Jialal I
    Clin Chem; 1997 Jun; 43(6 Pt 1):1040-7. PubMed ID: 9191559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A multicenter study on the precision and accuracy of homogeneous assays for LDL-cholesterol: comparison with a beta-quantification method using fresh serum obtained from non-diseased and diseased subjects.
    Miida T; Nishimura K; Okamura T; Hirayama S; Ohmura H; Yoshida H; Miyashita Y; Ai M; Tanaka A; Sumino H; Murakami M; Inoue I; Kayamori Y; Nakamura M; Nobori T; Miyazawa Y; Teramoto T; Yokoyama S
    Atherosclerosis; 2012 Nov; 225(1):208-15. PubMed ID: 22980501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analytical and clinical evaluation of two homogeneous assays for LDL-cholesterol in hyperlipidemic patients.
    Esteban-Salán M; Guimón-Bardesi A; de La Viuda-Unzueta JM; Azcarate-Ania MN; Pascual-Usandizaga P; Amoroto-Del-Río E
    Clin Chem; 2000 Aug; 46(8 Pt 1):1121-31. PubMed ID: 10926892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of an immunoprecipitation method for direct measurement of LDL-cholesterol with beta-quantification (ultracentrifugation).
    Jialal I; Hirany SV; Devaraj S; Sherwood TA
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1995 Jul; 104(1):76-81. PubMed ID: 7611188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Direct measurement of LDL-C in children: performance of two surfactant-based methods in a general pediatric population.
    Yu HH; Markowitz R; De Ferranti SD; Neufeld EJ; Farrow G; Bernstein HH; Rifai N
    Clin Biochem; 2000 Mar; 33(2):89-95. PubMed ID: 10751585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Analytical performance and clinical efficacy of three routine procedures for LDL cholesterol measurement compared with the ultracentrifugation-dextran sulfate-Mg(2+) method.
    Nauck M; Rifai N
    Clin Chim Acta; 2000 Apr; 294(1-2):77-92. PubMed ID: 10727675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Performance of a direct, immunoseparation based LDL-cholesterol method compared to Friedewald calculation and a polyvinyl sulphate precipitation method.
    Cobbaert C; Broodman I; Swart GR; Hoogerbrugge N
    Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem; 1995 Jul; 33(7):417-24. PubMed ID: 7548448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Immunoseparation method for measuring low-density lipoprotein cholesterol directly from serum evaluated.
    McNamara JR; Cole TG; Contois JH; Ferguson CA; Ordovas JM; Schaefer EJ
    Clin Chem; 1995 Feb; 41(2):232-40. PubMed ID: 7874777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Validation of the Friedewald formula for the determination of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol compared with beta-quantification in a large population.
    Tremblay AJ; Morrissette H; Gagné JM; Bergeron J; Gagné C; Couture P
    Clin Biochem; 2004 Sep; 37(9):785-90. PubMed ID: 15329317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Analytical performance of a direct assay for LDL-cholesterol: a comparative assessment versus Friedewald's formula.
    Türkalp I; Cil Z; Ozkazanç D
    Anadolu Kardiyol Derg; 2005 Mar; 5(1):13-7. PubMed ID: 15755695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of Two Homogeneous LDL-Cholesterol Assays Using Fresh Hypertriglyceridemic Serum and Quantitative Ultracentrifugation Fractions.
    Yano M; Matsunaga A; Harada S; Zhang B; Kawachi E; Tadera M; Saku K
    J Atheroscler Thromb; 2019 Nov; 26(11):979-988. PubMed ID: 30890680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Calculated low density lipoprotein cholesterol levels frequently underestimate directly measured low density lipoprotein cholesterol determinations in patients with serum triglyceride levels < or =4.52 mmol/l: an analysis comparing the LipiDirect magnetic LDL assay with the Friedewald calculation.
    Tighe DA; Ockene IS; Reed G; Nicolosi R
    Clin Chim Acta; 2006 Mar; 365(1-2):236-42. PubMed ID: 16259972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of methods for measurement of apolipoprotein B and cholesterol in low-density lipoproteins.
    Vrga L; Contacos C; Li SC; Sullivan DR
    Clin Chem; 1997 Feb; 43(2):390-3. PubMed ID: 9023145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Multicenter evaluation of four homogenous LDL-cholesterol assays].
    Bayer P; Veinberg F; Couderc R; Cherfils C; Cambillau M; Cosson C; Fradin S; Gillery P; Steinmetz J; Legrand A; Egloff M; Beucler I
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 2005; 63(1):27-41. PubMed ID: 15689310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analytical performance and clinical utility of a direct LDL-cholesterol assay in a hyperlipidemic pediatric population.
    Harris N; Neufeld EJ; Newburger JW; Ticho B; Baker A; Ginsburg GS; Rimm E; Rifai N
    Clin Chem; 1996 Aug; 42(8 Pt 1):1182-8. PubMed ID: 8697574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation and clinical application of a direct low-density lipoprotein cholesterol assay in normolipidemic and hyperlipidemic adults.
    Yu HH; Ginsburg GS; Harris N; Rifai N
    Am J Cardiol; 1997 Nov; 80(10):1295-9. PubMed ID: 9388101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Analytical and clinical performance of a homogeneous enzymatic LDL-cholesterol assay compared with the ultracentrifugation-dextran sulfate-Mg2+ method.
    Rifai N; Iannotti E; DeAngelis K; Law T
    Clin Chem; 1998 Jun; 44(6 Pt 1):1242-50. PubMed ID: 9625048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Validating the NIH LDL-C equation in a specialized lipid cohort: Does it add up?
    Higgins V; Leiter LA; Delaney SR; Beriault DR
    Clin Biochem; 2022 Jan; 99():60-68. PubMed ID: 34656564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Relation between RLP-triglyceride to RLP-cholesterol ratio and particle size distribution in RLP-cholesterol profiles by HPLC.
    Okazaki M; Usui S; Tada N; Nakano T; Nakajima K
    Clin Chim Acta; 2000 Jun; 296(1-2):135-49. PubMed ID: 10807977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Multicentric evaluation of the homogeneous LDL-cholesterol Plus assay: comparison with beta-quantification and Friedewald formula.
    Esteban-Salan M; Aguilar-Doreste JA; Arranz-Pena ML; Juve-Cuxart S; Gich-Salarich I; Zapico-Muniz E; Ordonez-Llanos J
    Clin Biochem; 2008 Nov; 41(16-17):1402-9. PubMed ID: 18722364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.