These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9191589)

  • 1. A systematic evaluation of the spherical model accuracy in EEG dipole localization.
    Yvert B; Bertrand O; Thévenet M; Echallier JF; Pernier J
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1997 May; 102(5):452-9. PubMed ID: 9191589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Improved dipole localization using local mesh refinement of realistic head geometries: an EEG simulation study.
    Yvert B; Bertrand O; Echallier JF; Pernier J
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1996 Jul; 99(1):79-89. PubMed ID: 8758973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of performance of spherical and realistic head models in dipole localization from noisy EEG.
    Vanrumste B; Van Hoey G; Van de Walle R; D'Havé MR; Lemahieu IA; Boon PA
    Med Eng Phys; 2002 Jul; 24(6):403-18. PubMed ID: 12135649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Development of volume conductor and source models to localize epileptic foci.
    Fuchs M; Wagner M; Kastner J
    J Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Apr; 24(2):101-19. PubMed ID: 17414966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy of EEG dipole source localization using implanted sources in the human brain.
    Krings T; Chiappa KH; Cuffin BN; Cochius JI; Connolly S; Cosgrove GR
    Clin Neurophysiol; 1999 Jan; 110(1):106-14. PubMed ID: 10348329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An evaluation of dipole reconstruction accuracy with spherical and realistic head models in MEG.
    Crouzeix A; Yvert B; Bertrand O; Pernier J
    Clin Neurophysiol; 1999 Dec; 110(12):2176-88. PubMed ID: 10616124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of EEG electrode density on dipole localization accuracy using two realistically shaped skull resistivity models.
    Laarne PH; Tenhunen-Eskelinen ML; Hyttinen JK; Eskola HJ
    Brain Topogr; 2000; 12(4):249-54. PubMed ID: 10912732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Error bounds for EEG and MEG dipole source localization.
    Mosher JC; Spencer ME; Leahy RM; Lewis PS
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1993 May; 86(5):303-21. PubMed ID: 7685264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A standardized boundary element method volume conductor model.
    Fuchs M; Kastner J; Wagner M; Hawes S; Ebersole JS
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2002 May; 113(5):702-12. PubMed ID: 11976050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of dipole position, orientation and noise on the accuracy of EEG source localization.
    Whittingstall K; Stroink G; Gates L; Connolly JF; Finley A
    Biomed Eng Online; 2003 Jun; 2():14. PubMed ID: 12807534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of cavities on EEG dipole localization and their relations with surface electrode positions.
    He B; Musha T
    Int J Biomed Comput; 1989 Dec; 24(4):269-82. PubMed ID: 2606568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Experimental tests of EEG source localization accuracy in realistically shaped head models.
    Cuffin BN; Schomer DL; Ives JR; Blume H
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2001 Dec; 112(12):2288-92. PubMed ID: 11738201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Review on solving the forward problem in EEG source analysis.
    Hallez H; Vanrumste B; Grech R; Muscat J; De Clercq W; Vergult A; D'Asseler Y; Camilleri KP; Fabri SG; Van Huffel S; Lemahieu I
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2007 Nov; 4():46. PubMed ID: 18053144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Low resolution brain electromagnetic tomography in a realistic geometry head model: a simulation study.
    Ding L; Lai Y; He B
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Jan; 50(1):45-56. PubMed ID: 15715421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Interictal spike localization using a standard realistic head model: simulations and analysis of clinical data.
    Silva C; Almeida R; Oostendorp T; Ducla-Soares E; Foreid JP; Pimentel T
    Clin Neurophysiol; 1999 May; 110(5):846-55. PubMed ID: 10400198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The validation of the finite difference method and reciprocity for solving the inverse problem in EEG dipole source analysis.
    Vanrumste B; Van Hoey G; Van de Walle R; D'Havé MR; Lemahieu IA; Boon PA
    Brain Topogr; 2001; 14(2):83-92. PubMed ID: 11797813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dipole localization in patients with epilepsy using the realistically shaped head model.
    Roth BJ; Ko D; von Albertini-Carletti IR; Scaffidi D; Sato S
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1997 Mar; 102(3):159-66. PubMed ID: 9129570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Conventional and reciprocal approaches to the inverse dipole localization problem of electroencephalography.
    Finke S; Gulrajani RM; Gotman J
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2003 Jun; 50(6):657-66. PubMed ID: 12814232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison between realistic and spherical approaches in EEG forward modelling.
    Meneghini F; Vatta F; Esposito F; Mininel S; Di Salle F
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2010 Jun; 55(3):133-46. PubMed ID: 20178450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of realistically shaped boundary-element and spherical head models in source localization of early somatosensory evoked potentials.
    Buchner H; Waberski TD; Fuchs M; Wischmann HA; Wagner M; Drenckhahn R
    Brain Topogr; 1995; 8(2):137-43. PubMed ID: 8793124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.