These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9191589)

  • 21. Equivalent dipole estimation of spontaneous EEG alpha activity: two-moving dipole approach.
    He B; Musha T
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 1992 May; 30(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 1453805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Approximating dipoles from human EEG activity: the effect of dipole source configuration on dipolarity using single dipole models.
    Hara J; Musha T; Shankle WR
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1999 Feb; 46(2):125-9. PubMed ID: 9932333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A study of dipole localization accuracy for MEG and EEG using a human skull phantom.
    Leahy RM; Mosher JC; Spencer ME; Huang MX; Lewine JD
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1998 Aug; 107(2):159-73. PubMed ID: 9751287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Spatial mislocalization of EEG electrodes -- effects on accuracy of dipole estimation.
    Khosla D; Don M; Kwong B
    Clin Neurophysiol; 1999 Feb; 110(2):261-71. PubMed ID: 10210615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Conventional and reciprocal approaches to the inverse dipole localization problem for N(20)-P (20) somatosensory evoked potentials.
    Finke S; Gulrajani RM; Gotman J; Savard P
    Brain Topogr; 2013 Jan; 26(1):24-34. PubMed ID: 22723019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. EEG localization accuracy improvements using realistically shaped head models.
    Cuffin BN
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1996 Mar; 43(3):299-303. PubMed ID: 8682542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Accuracy of EEG source reconstruction in the presence of brain lesions: modelling errors and surface electrodes' placement.
    Vatta F; Bruno P; Inchingolo P
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 2002; 38():423-8. PubMed ID: 12085644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Influence of head models on EEG simulations and inverse source localizations.
    Ramon C; Schimpf PH; Haueisen J
    Biomed Eng Online; 2006 Feb; 5():10. PubMed ID: 16466570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Insidious errors in dipole parameters due to shell model misspecification using multiple time-points.
    Zhang Z; Jewett DL; Goodwill G
    Brain Topogr; 1994; 6(4):283-98. PubMed ID: 7946928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. On the estimation of the number of dipole sources in EEG source localization.
    Bai X; He B
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Sep; 116(9):2037-43. PubMed ID: 16043395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Accuracy of two dipolar inverse algorithms applying reciprocity for forward calculation.
    Laarne P; Hyttinen J; Dodel S; Malmivuo J; Eskola H
    Comput Biomed Res; 2000 Jun; 33(3):172-85. PubMed ID: 10860584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Trends in EEG source localization.
    Koles ZJ
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1998 Feb; 106(2):127-37. PubMed ID: 9741773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. MEG versus EEG localization test using implanted sources in the human brain.
    Cohen D; Cuffin BN; Yunokuchi K; Maniewski R; Purcell C; Cosgrove GR; Ives J; Kennedy JG; Schomer DL
    Ann Neurol; 1990 Dec; 28(6):811-7. PubMed ID: 2285267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Forward and inverse problems of EEG dipole localization.
    Musha T; Okamoto Y
    Crit Rev Biomed Eng; 1999; 27(3-5):189-239. PubMed ID: 10864280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Ideal current dipoles are appropriate source representations for simulating neurons for intracranial recordings.
    Thio BJ; Aberra AS; Dessert GE; Grill WM
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2023 Jan; 145():26-35. PubMed ID: 36403433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Dipole modeling of epileptic spikes can be accurate or misleading.
    Kobayashi K; Yoshinaga H; Ohtsuka Y; Gotman J
    Epilepsia; 2005 Mar; 46(3):397-408. PubMed ID: 15730537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A simple method for EEG guided transcranial electrical stimulation without models.
    Cancelli A; Cottone C; Tecchio F; Truong DQ; Dmochowski J; Bikson M
    J Neural Eng; 2016 Jun; 13(3):036022. PubMed ID: 27172063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Spherical splines and average referencing in scalp electroencephalography.
    Ferree TC
    Brain Topogr; 2006; 19(1-2):43-52. PubMed ID: 17019635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Clinical utility of current-generation dipole modelling of scalp EEG.
    Plummer C; Litewka L; Farish S; Harvey AS; Cook MJ
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Nov; 118(11):2344-61. PubMed ID: 17889598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Location of electric current sources in the human brain estimated by the dipole tracing method of the scalp-skull-brain (SSB) head model.
    Homma S; Musha T; Nakajima Y; Okamoto Y; Blom S; Flink R; Hagbarth KE; Moström U
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1994 Nov; 91(5):374-82. PubMed ID: 7525234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.