BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9192459)

  • 1. Assessing interrater agreement from dependent data.
    Williamson JM; Manatunga AK
    Biometrics; 1997 Jun; 53(2):707-14. PubMed ID: 9192459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessing rater agreement using marginal association models.
    Perkins SM; Becker MP
    Stat Med; 2002 Jun; 21(12):1743-60. PubMed ID: 12111909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Computerized planimetry versus clinical assessment for the measurement of cervical ectopia.
    Morrison CS; Bright P; Blumenthal PD; Yacobson I; Kwok C; Zdenek S; Pan Z
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 May; 184(6):1170-6. PubMed ID: 11349184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A unified approach for assessing agreement for continuous and categorical data.
    Lin L; Hedayat AS; Wu W
    J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(4):629-52. PubMed ID: 17613645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quasi-symmetric latent class models, with application to rater agreement.
    Agresti A; Lang JB
    Biometrics; 1993 Mar; 49(1):131-9. PubMed ID: 8513099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Measuring cervical ectopy: direct visual assessment versus computerized planimetry.
    Gilmour E; Ellerbrock TV; Koulos JP; Chiasson MA; Williamson J; Kubn L; Wright TC
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Jan; 176(1 Pt 1):108-11. PubMed ID: 9024099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Simultaneous estimation of intrarater and interrater agreement for multiple raters under order restrictions for a binary trait.
    Lester Kirchner H; Lemke JH
    Stat Med; 2002 Jun; 21(12):1761-72. PubMed ID: 12111910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Efficient parameter estimation in longitudinal data analysis using a hybrid GEE method.
    Leung DH; Wang YG; Zhu M
    Biostatistics; 2009 Jul; 10(3):436-45. PubMed ID: 19346528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A latent trait finite mixture model for the analysis of rating agreement.
    Uebersax JS; Grove WM
    Biometrics; 1993 Sep; 49(3):823-35. PubMed ID: 10798855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Proportional hazards regression for cancer studies.
    Ghosh D
    Biometrics; 2008 Mar; 64(1):141-8. PubMed ID: 17573863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effective number of subjects and number of raters for inter-rater reliability studies.
    Saito Y; Sozu T; Hamada C; Yoshimura I
    Stat Med; 2006 May; 25(9):1547-60. PubMed ID: 16143966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Functional mixed-effects model for periodic data.
    Qin L; Guo W
    Biostatistics; 2006 Apr; 7(2):225-34. PubMed ID: 16207823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessing intrarater, interrater and test-retest reliability of continuous measurements.
    Rousson V; Gasser T; Seifert B
    Stat Med; 2002 Nov; 21(22):3431-46. PubMed ID: 12407682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Midwives' visual interpretation of intrapartum cardiotocographs: intra- and inter-observer agreement.
    Devane D; Lalor J
    J Adv Nurs; 2005 Oct; 52(2):133-41. PubMed ID: 16164474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An interrater reliability study of the Braden scale in two nursing homes.
    Kottner J; Dassen T
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2008 Oct; 45(10):1501-11. PubMed ID: 18395726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Finite mixture models for mapping spatially dependent disease counts.
    Alfó M; Nieddu L; Vicari D
    Biom J; 2009 Feb; 51(1):84-97. PubMed ID: 19219904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Minimum Hellinger distance estimation for k-component poisson mixture with random effects.
    Xiang L; Yau KK; Van Hui Y; Lee AH
    Biometrics; 2008 Jun; 64(2):508-18. PubMed ID: 17970817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Latent variable models for clustered ordinal data.
    Qu Y; Piedmonte MR; Medendorp SV
    Biometrics; 1995 Mar; 51(1):268-75. PubMed ID: 7766781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An exact test for detecting inconsistency in readers interpretation over time in screening mammograms.
    Lee JH; Eschrich S; Beam C
    Biom J; 2007 Aug; 49(5):672-81. PubMed ID: 17638286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Measurement of interrater agreement with adjustment for covariates.
    Barlow W
    Biometrics; 1996 Jun; 52(2):695-702. PubMed ID: 10766505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.