These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9193044)

  • 1. Fine structure of the 2 f1-f2 acoustic distortion products: effects of primary level and frequency ratios.
    He N; Schmiedt RA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Jun; 101(6):3554-65. PubMed ID: 9193044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The influence of systematic primary-tone level variation L2-L1 on the acoustic distortion product emission 2f1-f2 in normal human ears.
    Hauser R; Probst R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Jan; 89(1):280-6. PubMed ID: 2002169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. 2f1-f2 distortion product otoacoustic emissions in White Leghorn chickens (Gallus domesticus): effects of frequency ratio and relative level.
    Burkard R; Salvi R; Chen L
    Audiol Neurootol; 1996; 1(4):197-213. PubMed ID: 9390802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The influence of common stimulus parameters on distortion product otoacoustic emission fine structure.
    Johnson TA; Baranowski LG
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(2):239-49. PubMed ID: 21918451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of primary-level and primary-frequency ratios on human distortion product otoacoustic emissions.
    Johnson TA; Neely ST; Garner CA; Gorga MP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Jan; 119(1):418-28. PubMed ID: 16454296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cochlear microphonic evidence for mechanical propagation of distortion products (f2 - f1) and (2f1 - f2).
    Gibian GL; Kim DO
    Hear Res; 1982 Jan; 6(1):35-59. PubMed ID: 7054135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evidence for the distortion product frequency place as a source of distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) fine structure in humans. I. Fine structure and higher-order DPOAE as a function of the frequency ratio f2/f1.
    Mauermann M; Uppenkamp S; van Hengel PW; Kollmeier B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Dec; 106(6):3473-83. PubMed ID: 10615687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Two-tone distortion on the basilar membrane of the chinchilla cochlea.
    Robles L; Ruggero MA; Rich NC
    J Neurophysiol; 1997 May; 77(5):2385-99. PubMed ID: 9163365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The behavior of the acoustic distortion product, 2f1-f2, from the human ear and its relation to auditory sensitivity.
    Gaskill SA; Brown AM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Aug; 88(2):821-39. PubMed ID: 2212308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Distortion product otoacoustic emission (2f1-f2) amplitude as a function of f2/f1 frequency ratio and primary tone level separation in human adults and neonates.
    Abdala C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Dec; 100(6):3726-40. PubMed ID: 8969474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Age-related shifts in distortion product otoacoustic emissions peak-ratios and amplitude modulation spectra.
    Lai J; Bartlett EL
    Hear Res; 2015 Sep; 327():186-98. PubMed ID: 26232530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evidence of upward spread of suppression in DPOAE measurements.
    Gorga MP; Neely ST; Dorn PA; Dierking D; Cyr E
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Dec; 112(6):2910-20. PubMed ID: 12509012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Distortion product otoacoustic emission (2f1-f2) suppression in 3-month-old infants: evidence for postnatal maturation of human cochlear function?
    Abdala C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Dec; 116(6):3572-80. PubMed ID: 15658708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Measurement of acoustic distortion reveals underlying similarities between human and rodent mechanical responses.
    Brown AM; Gaskill SA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Aug; 88(2):840-9. PubMed ID: 2212309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Synchronization of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions to a 2f1-f2 distortion product.
    van Dijk P; Wit HP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Aug; 88(2):850-6. PubMed ID: 2212310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Human efferent adaptation of DPOAEs in the L1,L2 space.
    Meinke DK; Stagner BB; Martin GK; Lonsbury-Martin BL
    Hear Res; 2005 Oct; 208(1-2):89-100. PubMed ID: 16019174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions provide clues hearing mechanisms in the frog ear.
    Vassilakis PN; Meenderink SW; Narins PM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Dec; 116(6):3713-26. PubMed ID: 15658721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions (DPEs) in neonates: frequency ratio (F2/F1) and stimulus level differences (L1-L2).
    Quiñónez RE
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1999; 119(4):431-6. PubMed ID: 10445057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. On the relationships between the fixed-f1, fixed-f2, and fixed-ratio phase derivatives of the 2f1-f2 distortion product otoacoustic emission.
    Tubis A; Talmadge CL; Tong C; Dhar S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Oct; 108(4):1772-85. PubMed ID: 11051504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sources of DPOAEs revealed by suppression experiments, inverse fast Fourier transforms, and SFOAEs in impaired ears.
    Konrad-Martin D; Neely ST; Keefe DH; Dorn PA; Cyr E; Gorga MP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Apr; 111(4):1800-9. PubMed ID: 12002864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.