These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9193044)

  • 21. Further studies on the mechanics of the cochlear partition in the mustached bat. II. A second cochlear frequency map derived from acoustic distortion products.
    Kössl M; Vater M
    Hear Res; 1996 May; 94(1-2):78-86. PubMed ID: 8789813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Frequency responses of two- and three-tone distortion product otoacoustic emissions in Mongolian gerbils.
    Mills DM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 May; 107(5 Pt 1):2586-602. PubMed ID: 10830382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Psychophysical measures of two-tone suppression and distortion products (2f1-f2) and (f2-f1).
    Humes LE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Mar; 73(3):930-50. PubMed ID: 6841819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Distortion product otoacoustic emission test performance when both 2f1-f2 and 2f2-f1 are used to predict auditory status.
    Gorga MP; Nelson K; Davis T; Dorn PA; Neely ST
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Apr; 107(4):2128-35. PubMed ID: 10790038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Fine structure of the 2f1-f2 acoustic distortion product: changes with primary level.
    He NJ; Schmiedt RA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Nov; 94(5):2659-69. PubMed ID: 8270742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Modeling the combined effects of basilar membrane nonlinearity and roughness on stimulus frequency otoacoustic emission fine structure.
    Talmadge CL; Tubis A; Long GR; Tong C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Dec; 108(6):2911-32. PubMed ID: 11144584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effects of furosemide on distortion product otoacoustic emissions and on neuronal responses in the anteroventral cochlear nucleus.
    Rübsamen R; Mills DM; Rubel EW
    J Neurophysiol; 1995 Oct; 74(4):1628-38. PubMed ID: 8989399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Repeatability of high-frequency distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing adults.
    Dreisbach LE; Long KM; Lees SE
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):466-79. PubMed ID: 16957498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Mechanical responses to two-tone distortion products in the apical and basal turns of the mammalian cochlea.
    Cooper NP; Rhode WS
    J Neurophysiol; 1997 Jul; 78(1):261-70. PubMed ID: 9242278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Cancellation level and phase of the (f2-f1) distortion product.
    Humes LE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1985 Oct; 78(4):1245-51. PubMed ID: 4056218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effects of relative levels of the primary tones on distortion product otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing subjects.
    Beattie RC; Jones RL
    Audiology; 1998; 37(4):187-97. PubMed ID: 9723765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Characteristics of the acoustic distortion product 2f2-f1 from the normal human ear.
    Erminy M; Avan P; Bonfils P
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1998 Jan; 118(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 9504160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Modeling the fine structure of the 2f1-f2 acoustic distortion product. II. Model evaluation.
    Sun XM; Schmiedt RA; He NJ; Lam CF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Oct; 96(4):2175-83. PubMed ID: 7963031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Two-tone distortion at different longitudinal locations on the basilar membrane.
    He W; Nuttall AL; Ren T
    Hear Res; 2007 Jun; 228(1-2):112-22. PubMed ID: 17353104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Acoustic distortion products in humans: systematic changes in amplitudes as a function of f2/f1 ratio.
    Harris FP; Lonsbury-Martin BL; Stagner BB; Coats AC; Martin GK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Jan; 85(1):220-9. PubMed ID: 2921404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions and basilar membrane vibration in the 6-9 kHz region of sensitive chinchilla cochleae.
    Rhode WS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Nov; 122(5):2725-37. PubMed ID: 18189565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Cochlear compression: effects of low-frequency biasing on quadratic distortion product otoacoustic emission.
    Bian L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Dec; 116(6):3559-71. PubMed ID: 15658707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. High-Frequency Distortion-Product Otoacoustic Emission Repeatability in a Patient Population.
    Dreisbach L; Zettner E; Chang Liu M; Meuel Fernhoff C; MacPhee I; Boothroyd A
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(1):85-100. PubMed ID: 28678077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Test-retest repeatability of distortion product otoacoustic emissions.
    Wagner W; Heppelmann G; Vonthein R; Zenner HP
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):378-91. PubMed ID: 18382378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Interrelations among distortion-product phase-gradient delays: their connection to scaling symmetry and its breaking.
    Shera CA; Talmadge CL; Tubis A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Dec; 108(6):2933-48. PubMed ID: 11144585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.