These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9193045)

  • 21. High-frequency click-evoked otoacoustic emissions and behavioral thresholds in humans.
    Goodman SS; Fitzpatrick DF; Ellison JC; Jesteadt W; Keefe DH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Feb; 125(2):1014-32. PubMed ID: 19206876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evoked acoustic emissions and cochlear microphonics in the mustache bat, Pteronotus parnellii.
    Kössl M; Vater M
    Hear Res; 1985; 19(2):157-70. PubMed ID: 4055535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. 2f1-f2 distortion product otoacoustic emissions in White Leghorn chickens (Gallus domesticus): effects of frequency ratio and relative level.
    Burkard R; Salvi R; Chen L
    Audiol Neurootol; 1996; 1(4):197-213. PubMed ID: 9390802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions and high-frequency acoustic trauma in the guinea pig.
    Avan P; Bonfils P; Loth D; Elbez M; Erminy M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 May; 97(5 Pt 1):3012-20. PubMed ID: 7759641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Impact of three hours of discotheque music on pure-tone thresholds and distortion product otoacoustic emissions.
    Müller J; Dietrich S; Janssen T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Oct; 128(4):1853-69. PubMed ID: 20968358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A comparative study on the effect of pure-tone exposure of the guinea pig cochlea.
    Hotta S; Sugisawa T; Itoh T; Hasebe M; Yamamura K
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 1996; 253(1-2):45-51. PubMed ID: 8932430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Age-related declines in distortion product otoacoustic emissions utilizing pure tone contralateral stimulation in CBA/CaJ mice.
    Varghese GI; Zhu X; Frisina RD
    Hear Res; 2005 Nov; 209(1-2):60-7. PubMed ID: 16061336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The influence of moderate-intensity noise on the compound action potential evoked by tone bursts in the guinea pig, Cavia porcellus.
    Walger M; Schmidt U; von Wedel H
    Hear Res; 1985; 19(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 4055533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The Origin Along the Cochlea of Otoacoustic Emissions Evoked by Mid-Frequency Tone Pips.
    Goodman SS; Lefler SM; Lee C; Guinan JJ; Lichtenhan JT
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2024 Aug; 25(4):363-376. PubMed ID: 38937327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Additional findings on heritability and prenatal masculinization of cochlear mechanisms: click-evoked otoacoustic emissions.
    McFadden D; Loehlin JC; Pasanen EG
    Hear Res; 1996 Aug; 97(1-2):102-19. PubMed ID: 8844191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effect of salicylate on electrically evoked otoacoustic emissions elicited in the first and third turns of the guinea pig cochlea.
    Fujimura K; Yoshida M; Goto K; Mori T; Suzuki H
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2004 Oct; 124(8):896-901. PubMed ID: 15513523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Cochlear transducer operating point adaptation.
    Zou Y; Zheng J; Ren T; Nuttall A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Apr; 119(4):2232-41. PubMed ID: 16642838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effect of aspirin on transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions in guinea pigs.
    Ueda H; Yamamoto Y; Yanagita N
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 1996; 58(2):61-7. PubMed ID: 8736048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Tone burst evoked otoacoustic emissions in different age-groups of schoolchildren.
    Jedrzejczak WW; Pilka E; Skarzynski PH; Olszewski L; Skarzynski H
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Aug; 79(8):1310-5. PubMed ID: 26092548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The effect of various durations of noise exposure on auditory brainstem response, distortion product otoacoustic emissions and transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in rats.
    Fraenkel R; Freeman S; Sohmer H
    Audiol Neurootol; 2001; 6(1):40-9. PubMed ID: 11173774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Repeatability of click-evoked otoacoustic emission-based medial olivocochlear efferent assay.
    Mishra SK; Lutman ME
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(6):789-98. PubMed ID: 23739244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evidence for two discrete sources of 2f1-f2 distortion-product otoacoustic emission in rabbit. II: Differential physiological vulnerability.
    Whitehead ML; Lonsbury-Martin BL; Martin GK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Nov; 92(5):2662-82. PubMed ID: 1479129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Incomplete recovery of chicken distortion product otoacoustic emissions following acoustic overstimulation.
    Trautwein P; Salvi RJ; Miller K; Shero M; Hashino E
    Audiol Neurootol; 1996; 1(2):86-103. PubMed ID: 9390793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. DPOAE modifications induced by pure tone overstimulation in guinea pigs.
    Cianfrone G; Ingrosso A; Altissimi G; Ralli G; Turchetta R
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1998; 48():37-43. PubMed ID: 9505296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Frequency shifts with age in click-evoked otoacoustic emissions of preterm infants.
    Ubbink SW; van Dijk P; de Kleine E; Brienesse P; Chenault MN; Tan FE; Anteunis LJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jun; 129(6):3788-96. PubMed ID: 21682402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.