BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

352 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9193054)

  • 1. A behavioral measure of basilar-membrane nonlinearity in listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
    Oxenham AJ; Plack CJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Jun; 101(6):3666-75. PubMed ID: 9193054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Short-term temporal integration: evidence for the influence of peripheral compression.
    Oxenham AJ; Moore BC; Vickers DA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Jun; 101(6):3676-87. PubMed ID: 9193055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A new procedure for measuring peripheral compression in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Nelson DA; Schroder AC; Wojtczak M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Oct; 110(4):2045-64. PubMed ID: 11681384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Estimates of basilar-membrane nonlinearity effects on masking of tones and speech.
    Dubno JR; Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB
    Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):2-17. PubMed ID: 17204895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Psychophysical evidence for auditory compression at low characteristic frequencies.
    Plack CJ; Drga V
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Mar; 113(3):1574-86. PubMed ID: 12656392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response.
    Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB; Dubno JR
    Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Auditory filter nonlinearity in mild/moderate hearing impairment.
    Baker RJ; Rosen S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Mar; 111(3):1330-9. PubMed ID: 11931310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Masker phase effects in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners: evidence for peripheral compression at low signal frequencies.
    Oxenham AJ; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Oct; 116(4 Pt 1):2248-57. PubMed ID: 15532656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cochlear nonlinearity between 500 and 8000 Hz in listeners with normal hearing.
    Lopez-Poveda EA; Plack CJ; Meddis R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Feb; 113(2):951-60. PubMed ID: 12597188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Inferred basilar-membrane response functions for listeners with mild to moderate sensorineural hearing loss.
    Plack CJ; Drga V; Lopez-Poveda EA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Apr; 115(4):1684-95. PubMed ID: 15101647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cochlear compression in listeners with moderate sensorineural hearing loss.
    Lopez-Poveda EA; Plack CJ; Meddis R; Blanco JL
    Hear Res; 2005 Jul; 205(1-2):172-83. PubMed ID: 15953526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cochlear compression: recent insights from behavioural experiments.
    Plack CJ
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2013; 787():31-8. PubMed ID: 23716206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of spatial separation on informational masking of speech in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Arbogast TL; Mason CR; Kidd G
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Apr; 117(4 Pt 1):2169-80. PubMed ID: 15898658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effects of a high-frequency suppressor on tuning curves and derived basilar-membrane response functions.
    Yasin I; Plack CJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Jul; 114(1):322-32. PubMed ID: 12880044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Forward- and simultaneous-masked thresholds in bandlimited maskers in subjects with normal hearing and cochlear hearing loss.
    Dubno JR; Ahlstrom JB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Aug; 110(2):1049-57. PubMed ID: 11519573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of pure-tone forward masking on overshoot.
    Hicks ML; Bacon SP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Jul; 90(1):228-30. PubMed ID: 1880293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Forward-masking recovery and the assumptions of the temporal masking curve method of inferring cochlear compression.
    Pérez-González P; Johannesen PT; Lopez-Poveda EA
    Trends Hear; 2014 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 25534365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparing different estimates of cochlear compression in listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
    Rosengard PS; Oxenham AJ; Braida LD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 May; 117(5):3028-41. PubMed ID: 15957772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cochlear compression: perceptual measures and implications for normal and impaired hearing.
    Oxenham AJ; Bacon SP
    Ear Hear; 2003 Oct; 24(5):352-66. PubMed ID: 14534407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Masking of tones and speech by Schroeder-phase harmonic complexes in normally hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Summers V; Leek MR
    Hear Res; 1998 Apr; 118(1-2):139-50. PubMed ID: 9606069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.