These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9194140)

  • 21. Film-screen combinations in mammography.
    Price JL; Gamble J; Pearce P
    Br J Radiol; 1985 Jan; 58(685):99-100. PubMed ID: 4063647
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Film-screen combinations for mammography.
    Bakir YY; Roebuck EJ; Whelpton D; Worthington BS
    Br J Radiol; 1984 Jul; 57(679):653. PubMed ID: 6733415
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Digital mammography.
    Feig SA; Yaffe MJ
    Radiographics; 1998; 18(4):893-901. PubMed ID: 9672974
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The effect of phosphor persistence on image quality in digital x-ray scanning systems.
    Mainprize JG; Yaffe MJ
    Med Phys; 1998 Dec; 25(12):2440-54. PubMed ID: 9874838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Resolution at oblique incidence angles of a flat panel imager for breast tomosynthesis.
    Mainprize JG; Bloomquist AK; Kempston MP; Yaffe MJ
    Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3159-64. PubMed ID: 17022208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Digital mammography system problem.
    Peart O
    Radiol Technol; 2011; 82(6):569-70. PubMed ID: 21771940
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Fundamentals of digital mammography: physics, technology and practical considerations.
    Smith A
    Radiol Manage; 2003; 25(5):18-24, 26-31; quiz 32-4. PubMed ID: 14603590
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Film-screen combinations in mammography].
    Friedrich M
    Z Lymphol; 1983 Dec; 7(2):92-103. PubMed ID: 6673399
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Studies of x-ray energy absorption and quantum noise properties of x-ray screens by use of Monte Carlo simulation.
    Chan HP; Doi K
    Med Phys; 1984; 11(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 6700552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Modification of an automatic exposure control system for mammography to accommodate multiple-speed, screen-film systems.
    Rossi RP; Williams C; Gill D
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1988 Oct; 151(4):685-6. PubMed ID: 3262269
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Dosage loads and quality of the image in mammography].
    Kozlov AP; Shishov VA; Telesh LV; Fedorov IuA
    Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 1986; (3):74-9. PubMed ID: 3750831
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Experimental investigations of image quality in X-ray mammography with a conventional screen film system (SFS) and a new full-field digital mammography unit (DR) with a-Se-detector.
    Schulz-Wendtland R; Wenkel E; Schmid A; Imhoff K; Bautz W
    Rofo; 2003 Jun; 175(6):766-8. PubMed ID: 12811687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [The stationary grid in mammography: its clinical evaluation].
    Draghi F; Ferrozzi G; Ferrozzi F; Ferranti C
    Radiol Med; 1993; 85(1-2):96-102. PubMed ID: 8480057
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Y2O2S:Eu phosphor screens evaluation.
    Giakoumakis GE; Nomicos CD; Skountzos P; Koutroubas S; Zisos A; Yiakoumakis EN; Katsarioti MC; Kaliakatsos JA; Rovithi M; Panayiotakis GS
    Med Phys; 1993; 20(1):79-83. PubMed ID: 8455516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Clinical trial of mammography with film-screen-combinations. Part 1: Selection of a suitable film-screen system].
    Säbel M; Paterok EM; Weishaar J; Willgeroth F
    Rontgenpraxis; 1981; 34(11):458-66. PubMed ID: 7313855
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [A simple technique for quality improvement of breast specimen radiography].
    Meindl S; Glöcker M
    Rontgenpraxis; 1995 Jul; 48(7):214-6. PubMed ID: 7676360
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Recent developments in x-ray luminescent imaging systems].
    Gurvic AM; Wolf M; Starick D
    Radiol Diagn (Berl); 1990; 31(4):401-8. PubMed ID: 2236548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Validation of MTF measurement for digital mammography quality control.
    Carton AK; Vandenbroucke D; Struye L; Maidment AD; Kao YH; Albert M; Bosmans H; Marchal G
    Med Phys; 2005 Jun; 32(6):1684-95. PubMed ID: 16013727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Anisotropic imaging performance in breast tomosynthesis.
    Badano A; Kyprianou IS; Jennings RJ; Sempau J
    Med Phys; 2007 Nov; 34(11):4076-91. PubMed ID: 18074617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Breast implants. Phosphor screens].
    Crevecoeur A
    Rev Med Liege; 1998 Dec; 53(12):749-51. PubMed ID: 9927871
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.