BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

75 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9194360)

  • 1. [Basic and clinical studies of oral barium sulfate preparations for CT].
    Higashi T; Taoka Y; Harada M; Nishitani H
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1997 May; 57(6):314-8. PubMed ID: 9194360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Initial experience with oral contrast in PET/CT: phantom and clinical studies.
    Cohade C; Osman M; Nakamoto Y; Marshall LT; Links JM; Fishman EK; Wahl RL
    J Nucl Med; 2003 Mar; 44(3):412-6. PubMed ID: 12621008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. MR imaging of the gastrointestinal tract with i.v., gadolinium and diluted barium oral contrast media compared with unenhanced MR imaging and CT.
    Low RN; Francis IR
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Oct; 169(4):1051-9. PubMed ID: 9308464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dual-modality PET/CT scanning with negative oral contrast agent to avoid artifacts: introduction and evaluation.
    Antoch G; Kuehl H; Kanja J; Lauenstein TC; Schneemann H; Hauth E; Jentzen W; Beyer T; Goehde SC; Debatin JF
    Radiology; 2004 Mar; 230(3):879-85. PubMed ID: 14764889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of Two Neutral Oral Contrast Agents in Pediatric Patients: A Prospective Randomized Study.
    Dillman JR; Towbin AJ; Imbus R; Young J; Gates E; Trout AT
    Radiology; 2018 Jul; 288(1):245-251. PubMed ID: 29737955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Barium sulfate products for roentgenographic examination of the gastrointestinal tract.
    McKee MW; Jurgens RW
    Am J Hosp Pharm; 1986 Jan; 43(1):145-8. PubMed ID: 3953584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of dilute barium and dilute water-soluble contrast in opacification of the bowel for abdominal computed tomography.
    Chambers SE; Best JJ
    Clin Radiol; 1984 Nov; 35(6):463-4. PubMed ID: 6499385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Water as a contrast medium: a re-evaluation using the multidetector-row computed tomography.
    Makarawo TP; Negussie E; Malde S; Tilak J; Gayagoy J; Watson J; Francis F; Lincoln D; Jacobs MJ
    Am Surg; 2013 Jul; 79(7):728-33. PubMed ID: 23816008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multiplanar helical CT enterography in patients with Crohn's disease.
    Raptopoulos V; Schwartz RK; McNicholas MM; Movson J; Pearlman J; Joffe N
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Dec; 169(6):1545-50. PubMed ID: 9393162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Double contrast X-ray examination of stomach.
    Wiljasalo M; Wiljasalo S; Valle M; Tallroth K; Korhola O; Somer K
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 1977; 12(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 834968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The value of barium as a gastrointestinal contrast agent in MR imaging: a comparison study in normal volunteers.
    Ros PR; Steinman RM; Torres GM; Burton SS; Panaccione JL; Rappaport DC; McGorray SP
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1991 Oct; 157(4):761-7. PubMed ID: 1892032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Water-equivalent oral contrast agents in dual-modality PET/computed tomography scanning: does a little barium make the difference?
    Kinner S; Veit-Haibach P; Lauenstein TC; Bockisch A; Antoch G
    Nucl Med Commun; 2009 Mar; 30(3):206-9. PubMed ID: 19262282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [The marking of the gastrointestinal tract in computed tomography: experiences with a barium sulfate contrast medium (Micropaque CT)].
    Golder W; Viermetz M; Gmeinwieser J
    Rofo; 1991 Dec; 155(6):562-7. PubMed ID: 1764598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Abdominal helical CT: milk as a low-attenuation oral contrast agent.
    Thompson SE; Raptopoulos V; Sheiman RL; McNicholas MM; Prassopoulos P
    Radiology; 1999 Jun; 211(3):870-5. PubMed ID: 10352618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Development of two oral contrast materials for CT evaluation of the esophagus.
    Laohawiriyakamol K; Laothamatas J; Chanyongvorakul E
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2007 May; 90(5):903-12. PubMed ID: 17596044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Comparison of 2 positive and 1 negative oral contrast media for abdominal CT diagnosis].
    Zwaan M; Gmelin E
    Rontgenblatter; 1989 May; 42(5):219-23. PubMed ID: 2756307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of double contrast barium meal and endoscopy.
    Wiljasalo M; Tallroth K; Korhola O; Ihamäki T
    Diagn Imaging; 1980; 49(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 7358014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of "Gastromiro" for bowel opacification during computed tomography: comparison with diatrizoate and barium sulphate.
    Doyle GJ; O'Donnell SC; McDonald JR; Murthy LN; Keir MJ; Wright AR
    Br J Radiol; 1993 Aug; 66(788):681-4. PubMed ID: 7719680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Picture quality, tolerance, acceptance and longevity of a barium sulfate suspension (Micropaque CT) as an oral intestinal contrast medium for abdominal computed tomography].
    Müller RD; Buddenbrock B
    Rontgenpraxis; 1992 Oct; 45(10):349-55. PubMed ID: 1440063
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Comparison of iodinated and barium-containing contrast media of different viscosity in the detection of pharyngeal perforation].
    Keberle M; Wittenberg G; Trusen A; Baumgartner W; Hahn D
    Rofo; 2001 Aug; 173(8):691-5. PubMed ID: 11570237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.