212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9194458)
1. Extent of smooth muscle resection during mucosectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis affects anorectal physiology and functional outcome.
Becker JM; LaMorte W; St Marie G; Ferzoco S
Dis Colon Rectum; 1997 Jun; 40(6):653-60. PubMed ID: 9194458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Late functional adaptation after colectomy, mucosal proctectomy, and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.
Becker JM; McGrath KM; Meagher MP; Parodi JE; Dunnegan DA; Soper NJ
Surgery; 1991 Oct; 110(4):718-24; discussion 725. PubMed ID: 1925961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of anal manipulation and pouch design on ileal pouch function.
Tuckson WB; McNamara MJ; Fazio VW; Lavery IC; Oakley JR
J Natl Med Assoc; 1991 Dec; 83(12):1089-92. PubMed ID: 1813639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sphincter defects are not associated with long-term incontinence following ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.
Gearhart SL; Hull TL; Schroeder T; Church J; Floruta C
Dis Colon Rectum; 2005 Jul; 48(7):1410-5. PubMed ID: 15793633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Manometric study in ulcerative colitis patients with modified ileal pouch--anal anastomosis.
Kobakov G; Kostov D; Temelkov T
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2006 Dec; 21(8):767-73. PubMed ID: 16583195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Recovery of the internal anal sphincter and continence after restorative proctocolectomy.
Farouk R; Duthie GS; Bartolo DC
Br J Surg; 1994 Jul; 81(7):1065-8. PubMed ID: 7922067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mucosectomy vs. stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis: functional outcome and neoplasia control.
Remzi FH; Church JM; Bast J; Lavery IC; Strong SA; Hull TL; Harris GJ; Delaney CP; O'Riordain MG; McGannon EA; Fazio VW
Dis Colon Rectum; 2001 Nov; 44(11):1590-6. PubMed ID: 11711729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Functional outcome after intersphincteric resection of the rectum with coloanal anastomosis in low rectal cancer.
Bittorf B; Stadelmaier U; Göhl J; Hohenberger W; Matzel KE
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2004 Apr; 30(3):260-5. PubMed ID: 15028306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Randomized prospective trial comparing ileal pouch-anal anastomosis performed by excising the anal mucosa to ileal pouch-anal anastomosis performed by preserving the anal mucosa.
Reilly WT; Pemberton JH; Wolff BG; Nivatvongs S; Devine RM; Litchy WJ; McIntyre PB
Ann Surg; 1997 Jun; 225(6):666-76; discussion 676-7. PubMed ID: 9230807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Determinants of stool frequency after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.
O'Connell PR; Pemberton JH; Brown ML; Kelly KA
Am J Surg; 1987 Feb; 153(2):157-64. PubMed ID: 3812889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Handsewn ileal pouch-anal anastomosis on the dentate line after total proctectomy: technique to avoid incomplete mucosectomy and the need for long-term follow-up of the anal transition zone.
Régimbeau JM; Panis Y; Pocard M; Hautefeuille P; Valleur P
Dis Colon Rectum; 2001 Jan; 44(1):43-50; discussion 50-1. PubMed ID: 11805562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Continence of anorectal sphincter complex in the early postoperative period after direct colo-anal anastomoses with colo-colic J pouch].
Damianov N; Tankova L; Draganov V
Khirurgiia (Sofiia); 2003; 59(1-2):32-4. PubMed ID: 15587742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Neorectal reservoir is not the functional principle of the colonic J-pouch: the volume of a short colonic J-pouch does not differ from a straight coloanal anastomosis.
Fürst A; Burghofer K; Hutzel L; Jauch KW
Dis Colon Rectum; 2002 May; 45(5):660-7. PubMed ID: 12004217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Can a meta-analysis answer the question: is mucosectomy and handsewn or double-stapled anastomosis better in ileal pouch-anal anastomosis?
Schluender SJ; Mei L; Yang H; Fleshner PR
Am Surg; 2006 Oct; 72(10):912-6. PubMed ID: 17058734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Restorative proctectomy. A comparison of direct colo-anal and colon-pouch-anal anastomoses for reconstructing continuity].
Kienle P; Stern J; Herfarth C
Chirurg; 1997 Jun; 68(6):630-2. PubMed ID: 9324444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Integrity of the anal sphincters after pouch-anal anastomosis: evaluation with three-dimensional endoanal ultrasonography.
Gosselink MP; West RL; Kuipers EJ; Hansen BE; Schouten WR
Dis Colon Rectum; 2005 Sep; 48(9):1728-35. PubMed ID: 15981069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of J-pouch and coloplasty pouch for low rectal cancers: a randomized, controlled trial investigating functional results and comparative anastomotic leak rates.
Ho YH; Brown S; Heah SM; Tsang C; Seow-Choen F; Eu KW; Tang CL
Ann Surg; 2002 Jul; 236(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 12131085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Physiology of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Current concepts.
Goes R; Beart RW
Dis Colon Rectum; 1995 Sep; 38(9):996-1005. PubMed ID: 7656753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Should ileal pouch-anal anastomosis include mucosectomy?
Chambers WM; McC Mortensen NJ
Colorectal Dis; 2007 Jun; 9(5):384-92. PubMed ID: 17504334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Recovery of the rectoanal inhibitory reflex after restorative proctocolectomy: does it correlate with nocturnal continence?
Saigusa N; Belin BM; Choi HJ; Gervaz P; Efron JE; Weiss EG; Nogueras JJ; Wexner SD
Dis Colon Rectum; 2003 Feb; 46(2):168-72. PubMed ID: 12576889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
