These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9194544)

  • 1. A lesson on preparedness.
    Nature; 1997 Jun; 387(6635):743. PubMed ID: 9194544
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Wellcome Trust sets out fresh misconduct standards.
    Klarreich E
    Nature; 2001 Aug; 412(6848):667. PubMed ID: 11507596
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Surviving misconduct is one thing, accountability is another.
    Nature; 1998 Oct; 395(6704):727. PubMed ID: 9796798
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Macchiarini scandal is a valuable lesson for the Karolinska Institute.
    Nature; 2016 Sep; 537(7619):137. PubMed ID: 27604911
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Institute Pasteur to adopt 'automatic' misconduct process.
    Butler D
    Nature; 1995 Feb; 373(6516):647. PubMed ID: 7854426
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical research. Fred Hutchinson Center under fire.
    Marshall E
    Science; 2001 Apr; 292(5514):25. PubMed ID: 11294194
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Austria: Academy of Sciences states its case.
    Schuster P; Friesinger H
    Nature; 2008 Oct; 455(7213):589-90. PubMed ID: 18833250
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Collateral damage: How a case of misconduct brought a leading Japanese biology institute to its knees.
    Cyranoski D
    Nature; 2015 Apr; 520(7549):600-3. PubMed ID: 25925457
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Moving targets.
    Nature; 1996 Sep; 383(6596):105. PubMed ID: 8774870
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The academic birth rate. Production and reproduction of the research work force, and its effect on innovation and research misconduct.
    Martinson BC
    EMBO Rep; 2011 Jul; 12(8):758-62. PubMed ID: 21738219
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Why has COPE developed guidelines for cooperation between journals and research institutions?
    Wager E
    Med Arch; 2012; 66(4):220-1. PubMed ID: 22919873
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Preventing and processing research misconduct: a new Australian code for responsible research.
    Van Der Weyden MB
    Med J Aust; 2006 May; 184(9):430-1. PubMed ID: 16646740
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Research conduct. Lessons of the stem cell scandal.
    Cho MK; McGee G; Magnus D
    Science; 2006 Feb; 311(5761):614-5. PubMed ID: 16456065
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. International recruitment highlights need to track scientific behaviour.
    Dalton R
    Nature; 1996 Sep; 383(6596):107-8. PubMed ID: 8774871
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Integrity from the top down.
    Nature; 2002 Aug; 418(6898):569. PubMed ID: 12167816
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fraud: just say no!
    Blaustein JD
    Endocrinology; 2010 Jan; 151(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 20028876
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Due process in investigations of research misconduct.
    Mello MM; Brennan TA
    N Engl J Med; 2003 Sep; 349(13):1280-6. PubMed ID: 14507953
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fraud claims shake German complacency.
    Abbott A
    Nature; 1997 Jun; 387(6635):750. PubMed ID: 9194549
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Policy: Boost basic research in China.
    Yang W
    Nature; 2016 Jun; 534(7608):467-9. PubMed ID: 27337328
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Complainant issues in research misconduct: the office of research integrity experience.
    Pascal CB
    Exp Biol Med (Maywood); 2006 Jul; 231(7):1264-70. PubMed ID: 16816133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.