These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9194549)

  • 1. Fraud claims shake German complacency.
    Abbott A
    Nature; 1997 Jun; 387(6635):750. PubMed ID: 9194549
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Whistleblowing in biomedical research: report from a workshop.
    Mishkin B
    IRB; 1982 Feb; 4(2):8-9. PubMed ID: 11658314
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Policing fraud and deceit: the legal aspects of misconduct in scientific inquiry.
    Protti M
    J Infor Ethics; 1996; 5(1):59-71. PubMed ID: 11653390
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The politics of research misconduct: congressional oversight, universities, and science.
    LaFollette MC
    J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):261-85. PubMed ID: 11653364
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ruling brings cash windfall in US fraud case.
    Dalton R
    Nature; 1995 May; 375(6529):270. PubMed ID: 7753183
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Tougher crackdown on fraud needed.
    del Guercio P
    Nature; 1998 Aug; 394(6696):823. PubMed ID: 9732860
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Science comes to terms with the lessons of fraud.
    Abbott A
    Nature; 1999 Mar; 398(6722):13-7. PubMed ID: 10078516
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Surviving misconduct is one thing, accountability is another.
    Nature; 1998 Oct; 395(6704):727. PubMed ID: 9796798
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fraud squad moves in on universities.
    Cross M; Connor S; Anderson I
    New Sci; 1985 Jun; 106(1459):8. PubMed ID: 11655696
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Academics face abuse of rules designed to protect research.
    Cowen RC
    Christ Sci Monitor; 1998 Mar; ():13. PubMed ID: 11647561
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fraud squad files report to prosecutor in Inserm case.
    Butler D
    Nature; 1998 Jul; 394(6691):308. PubMed ID: 9690461
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The demise of the social contract for science: misconduct in science and the nonmodern world.
    Guston DH
    Centen Rev; 1994; 38(2):215-48. PubMed ID: 11656758
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Scientific misconduct: individual deviance or system complacency?
    Luft P; Sprague RL
    J Infor Ethics; 1996; 5(1):72-81. PubMed ID: 11653391
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Deception in scientific research.
    Woolf PK
    Jurimetrics; 1988; 29(1):67-95. PubMed ID: 11654908
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Institutional policies for responding to allegations of research fraud.
    Greene PJ; Durch JS; Horwitz W; Hooper VS
    IRB; 1986; 8(4):1-7. PubMed ID: 11653742
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Harvard faces questions on missing data.
    Dalton R
    Nature; 1997 Mar; 386(6622):206. PubMed ID: 9069272
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Regulation of scientific misconduct in federally funded research.
    Steinberg NA
    South Calif Interdiscip Law J; 2000; 10(1):39-105. PubMed ID: 12953675
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Research fraud, misconduct, and the IRB.
    Hilgartner S
    IRB; 1990; 12(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 11651971
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Research ethics. Germany gets in step with scientific misconduct rules.
    Bostanci A
    Science; 2002 Jun; 296(5574):1778. PubMed ID: 12052923
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Illmensee responds.
    Illmensee K
    New Sci; 1984 Jun; 102(1413):40. PubMed ID: 11655647
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.