These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9194560)

  • 21. Evidence for the auditory P3a reflecting an automatic process: elicitation during highly-focused continuous visual attention.
    Muller-Gass A; Macdonald M; Schröger E; Sculthorpe L; Campbell K
    Brain Res; 2007 Sep; 1170():71-8. PubMed ID: 17692834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
    Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Processing capacity in chronic pain patients: a visual event-related potentials study.
    Veldhuijzen DS; Kenemans JL; van Wijck AJ; Olivier B; Kalkman CJ; Volkerts ER
    Pain; 2006 Mar; 121(1-2):60-8. PubMed ID: 16480825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Attentional blink deficits observed in dyslexia depend on task demands.
    Buchholz J; Aimola Davies A
    Vision Res; 2007 May; 47(10):1292-302. PubMed ID: 17408718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The integration of parallel and serial processing mechanisms in visual search: evidence from eye movement recording.
    Maioli C; Benaglio I; Siri S; Sosta K; Cappa S
    Eur J Neurosci; 2001 Jan; 13(2):364-72. PubMed ID: 11168541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Salience is only briefly represented: evidence from probe-detection performance.
    Donk M; Soesman L
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Apr; 36(2):286-302. PubMed ID: 20364919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The effect of visuospatial attentional load on the processing of irrelevant acoustic distractors.
    Zhang P; Chen X; Yuan P; Zhang D; He S
    Neuroimage; 2006 Nov; 33(2):715-24. PubMed ID: 16956775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Goal-driven selective attention in patients with right hemisphere lesions: how intact is the ipsilesional field?
    Snow JC; Mattingley JB
    Brain; 2006 Jan; 129(Pt 1):168-81. PubMed ID: 16317021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Selective attention supports working memory maintenance by modulating perceptual processing of distractors.
    Sreenivasan KK; Jha AP
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Jan; 19(1):32-41. PubMed ID: 17214561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Attentional load and sensory competition in human vision: modulation of fMRI responses by load at fixation during task-irrelevant stimulation in the peripheral visual field.
    Schwartz S; Vuilleumier P; Hutton C; Maravita A; Dolan RJ; Driver J
    Cereb Cortex; 2005 Jun; 15(6):770-86. PubMed ID: 15459076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. An electrophysiological assessment of distractor suppression in visual search tasks.
    Mazza V; Turatto M; Caramazza A
    Psychophysiology; 2009 Jul; 46(4):771-5. PubMed ID: 19490518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Preattentive control of serial auditory processing in dichotic listening.
    Yund EW; Uno A; Woods DL
    Brain Lang; 1999 Feb; 66(3):358-76. PubMed ID: 10190996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effects of task relevance and stimulus-driven salience in feature-search mode.
    Lamy D; Leber A; Egeth HE
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Dec; 30(6):1019-31. PubMed ID: 15584812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. When does visual attention select all features of a distractor?
    Chen Z; Cave KR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Dec; 32(6):1452-64. PubMed ID: 17154784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Preattentive representation of feature conjunctions for concurrent spatially distributed auditory objects.
    Takegata R; Brattico E; Tervaniemi M; Varyagina O; Näätänen R; Winkler I
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Sep; 25(1):169-79. PubMed ID: 15953710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Top-down feature-based selection of matching features for audio-visual synchrony discrimination.
    Fujisaki W; Nishida S
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Mar; 433(3):225-30. PubMed ID: 18281153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Simultaneous priming along multiple feature dimensions in a visual search task.
    Kristjánsson A
    Vision Res; 2006 Aug; 46(16):2554-70. PubMed ID: 16527323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Saccadic selectivity in complex visual search displays.
    Pomplun M
    Vision Res; 2006 Jun; 46(12):1886-900. PubMed ID: 16445960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A common light-prior for visual search, shape, and reflectance judgments.
    Adams WJ
    J Vis; 2007 Aug; 7(11):11.1-7. PubMed ID: 17997666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A new elementary feature of vision.
    Fahle M
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1991 Jun; 32(7):2151-5. PubMed ID: 2055706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.