379 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9194652)
1. Semen parameters in a fertile versus subfertile population: a need for change in the interpretation of semen testing.
Ombelet W; Bosmans E; Janssen M; Cox A; Vlasselaer J; Gyselaers W; Vandeput H; Gielen J; Pollet H; Maes M; Steeno O; Kruger T
Hum Reprod; 1997 May; 12(5):987-93. PubMed ID: 9194652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Semen parameters, including WHO and strict criteria morphology, in a fertile and subfertile population: an effort towards standardization of in-vivo thresholds.
Menkveld R; Wong WY; Lombard CJ; Wetzels AM; Thomas CM; Merkus HM; Steegers-Theunissen RP
Hum Reprod; 2001 Jun; 16(6):1165-71. PubMed ID: 11387287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sperm morphology, motility, and concentration in fertile and infertile men.
Guzick DS; Overstreet JW; Factor-Litvak P; Brazil CK; Nakajima ST; Coutifaris C; Carson SA; Cisneros P; Steinkampf MP; Hill JA; Xu D; Vogel DL;
N Engl J Med; 2001 Nov; 345(19):1388-93. PubMed ID: 11794171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Headless spermatozoa in semen specimens from fertile and subfertile men.
Panidis D; Rousso D; Kourtis A; Gianoulis C; Papathanasiou K; Kalachanis J
J Reprod Med; 2001 Nov; 46(11):947-50. PubMed ID: 11762149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Semen parameter thresholds and time-to-conception in subfertile couples: how high is high enough?
Keihani S; Verrilli LE; Zhang C; Presson AP; Hanson HA; Pastuszak AW; Johnstone EB; Hotaling JM
Hum Reprod; 2021 Jul; 36(8):2121-2133. PubMed ID: 34097024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sperm morphology assessment: diagnostic potential and comparative analysis of strict or WHO criteria in a fertile and a subfertile population.
Ombelet W; Wouters E; Boels L; Cox A; Janssen M; Spiessens C; Vereecken A; Bosmans E; Steeno O
Int J Androl; 1997 Dec; 20(6):367-72. PubMed ID: 9568530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A study of semen parameters with emphasis on sperm morphology in a fertile population: an attempt to develop clinical thresholds.
Gunalp S; Onculoglu C; Gurgan T; Kruger TF; Lombard CJ
Hum Reprod; 2001 Jan; 16(1):110-114. PubMed ID: 11139547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Development of normal reference values for seminal reactive oxygen species and their correlation with leukocytes and semen parameters in a fertile population.
Athayde KS; Cocuzza M; Agarwal A; Krajcir N; Lucon AM; Srougi M; Hallak J
J Androl; 2007; 28(4):613-20. PubMed ID: 17409462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Conventional semen parameters and DNA fragmentation in relation to fertility status in a Greek population.
Evgeni E; Lymberopoulos G; Gazouli M; Asimakopoulos B
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 May; 188():17-23. PubMed ID: 25770843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Correlation between semen parameters and the Hamster Egg Penetration Test (HEPT) among fertile and subfertile men in Singapore.
Ho LM; Lim AS; Lim TH; Hum SC; Yu SL; Kruger TF
J Androl; 2007; 28(1):158-63. PubMed ID: 16957140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The use of semen parameters to identify the subfertile male in the general population.
van der Merwe FH; Kruger TF; Oehninger SC; Lombard CJ
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2005; 59(2):86-91. PubMed ID: 15572878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Risk of childhood mortality in family members of men with poor semen quality.
Hanson HA; Mayer EN; Anderson RE; Aston KI; Carrell DT; Berger J; Lowrance WT; Smith KR; Hotaling JM
Hum Reprod; 2017 Jan; 32(1):239-247. PubMed ID: 27927843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Testicular function in a birth cohort of young men.
Hart RJ; Doherty DA; McLachlan RI; Walls ML; Keelan JA; Dickinson JE; Skakkebaek NE; Norman RJ; Handelsman DJ
Hum Reprod; 2015 Dec; 30(12):2713-24. PubMed ID: 26409015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The reference values for semen parameters of 1213 fertile men in Guangdong Province in China.
Tang YG; Tang LX; Wang QL; Song G; Jiang YJ; Deng SM; Jiang F; Qin WB
Asian J Androl; 2015; 17(2):298-303. PubMed ID: 25432502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Decline in seminal quality in Indian men over the last 37 years.
Mishra P; Negi MPS; Srivastava M; Singh K; Rajender S
Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2018 Oct; 16(1):103. PubMed ID: 30352581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Association between adherence to the Mediterranean diet and semen quality parameters in male partners of couples attempting fertility.
Karayiannis D; Kontogianni MD; Mendorou C; Douka L; Mastrominas M; Yiannakouris N
Hum Reprod; 2017 Jan; 32(1):215-222. PubMed ID: 27994040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluating γH2AX in spermatozoa from male infertility patients.
Zhong HZ; Lv FT; Deng XL; Hu Y; Xie DN; Lin B; Mo ZN; Lin FQ
Fertil Steril; 2015 Sep; 104(3):574-81. PubMed ID: 26158906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Round-headed spermatozoa in semen specimens from fertile and subfertile men.
Kalahanis J; Rousso D; Kourtis A; Mavromatidis G; Makedos G; Panidis D
J Reprod Med; 2002 Jun; 47(6):489-93. PubMed ID: 12092019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The 1999 and 2010 WHO reference values for human semen analysis to predict sperm DNA damage: A comparative study.
Aghazarian A; Huf W; Pflüger H; Klatte T
Reprod Biol; 2020 Sep; 20(3):379-383. PubMed ID: 32527621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Total motile sperm count: a better indicator for the severity of male factor infertility than the WHO sperm classification system.
Hamilton JA; Cissen M; Brandes M; Smeenk JM; de Bruin JP; Kremer JA; Nelen WL; Hamilton CJ
Hum Reprod; 2015 May; 30(5):1110-21. PubMed ID: 25788568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
