These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9195155)

  • 1. Relationship estimation in affected sib pair analysis of late-onset diseases.
    Göring HH; Ott J
    Eur J Hum Genet; 1997; 5(2):69-77. PubMed ID: 9195155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Model-free sib-pair linkage analysis: combining full-sib and half-sib pairs.
    Schaid DJ; Elston RC; Tran L; Wilson AF
    Genet Epidemiol; 2000 Jul; 19(1):30-51. PubMed ID: 10861895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Optimal weighting scheme for affected sib-pair analysis of sibship data.
    Sham PC; Zhao JH; Curtis D
    Ann Hum Genet; 1997 Jan; 61(Pt 1):61-9. PubMed ID: 9066928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Affected sib-pair tests for linkage: type I errors with dependent sib-pairs.
    Meunier F; Philippi A; Martinez M; Demenais F
    Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(6):1107-11. PubMed ID: 9433632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Extensions to methods of sib-pair linkage analyses.
    Flanders WD; Khoury MJ
    Genet Epidemiol; 1991; 8(6):399-408. PubMed ID: 1806409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. ASP--a simulation-based power calculator for genetic linkage studies of qualitative traits, using sib-pairs.
    Krawczak M
    Hum Genet; 2001 Dec; 109(6):675-7. PubMed ID: 11810280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of sib-pair linkage tests for disease susceptibility loci.
    Blackwelder WC; Elston RC
    Genet Epidemiol; 1985; 2(1):85-97. PubMed ID: 3863778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The impact of varying diagnostic thresholds on affected sib pair linkage analysis.
    Kendler KS
    Genet Epidemiol; 1988; 5(6):407-19. PubMed ID: 3209053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Relationship uncertainty linkage statistics (RULS): affected relative pair statistics that model relationship uncertainty.
    Ray A; Weeks DE
    Genet Epidemiol; 2008 May; 32(4):313-24. PubMed ID: 18205206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Genetic Analysis Workshop II: sib pair screening tests for linkage.
    Elston RC
    Genet Epidemiol; 1984; 1(2):175-8. PubMed ID: 14968835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of four sib-pair linkage methods for analyzing sibships with more than two affecteds: interest of the binomial maximum likelihood approach.
    Abel L; Alcais A; Mallet A
    Genet Epidemiol; 1998; 15(4):371-90. PubMed ID: 9671987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Haseman and Elston revisited.
    Elston RC; Buxbaum S; Jacobs KB; Olson JM
    Genet Epidemiol; 2000 Jul; 19(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 10861893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Affected-sib-pair test for linkage based on constraints for identical-by-descent distributions corresponding to disease models with imprinting.
    Knapp M; Strauch K
    Genet Epidemiol; 2004 May; 26(4):273-85. PubMed ID: 15095387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. GMCheck: Bayesian error checking for pedigree genotypes and phenotypes.
    Thomas A
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Jul; 21(14):3187-8. PubMed ID: 15879454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. On identification problems requiring linked autosomal markers.
    Egeland T; Sheehan N
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2008 Jun; 2(3):219-25. PubMed ID: 19083824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Two-stage global search designs for linkage analysis I: use of the mean statistic for affected sib pairs.
    Guo X; Elston RC
    Genet Epidemiol; 2000 Feb; 18(2):97-110. PubMed ID: 10642424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Testing linkage and gene x environment interaction: comparison of different affected sib-pair methods.
    Dizier MH; Selinger-Leneman H; Genin E
    Genet Epidemiol; 2003 Jul; 25(1):73-9. PubMed ID: 12813728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Correcting for ascertainment bias of relative-risk estimates obtained using affected-sib-pair linkage data.
    Cordell HJ; Olson JM
    Genet Epidemiol; 2000 Apr; 18(4):307-21. PubMed ID: 10797591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Parametric model-based statistics for possible genotyping errors and sample stratification in sibling-pair SNP data.
    Korostishevsky M; Malkin I; Spector T; Livshits G
    Genet Epidemiol; 2010 Jan; 34(1):26-33. PubMed ID: 19455577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of misspecification of allele frequencies on the power of Haseman-Elston sib-pair linkage method for quantitative traits.
    Mandal DM; Wilson AF; Bailey-Wilson JE
    Am J Med Genet; 2001 Nov; 103(4):308-13. PubMed ID: 11746011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.