BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9195316)

  • 1. Cementless revision of total hip arthroplasty using the anatomic porous replacement revision prosthesis.
    Buoncristiani AM; Dorr LD; Johnson C; Wan Z
    J Arthroplasty; 1997 Jun; 12(4):403-15. PubMed ID: 9195316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. High Survivorship With Cementless Stems and Cortical Strut Allografts for Large Femoral Bone Defects in Revision THA.
    Kim YH; Park JW; Kim JS; Rastogi D
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Sep; 473(9):2990-3000. PubMed ID: 26013152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Revision total hip arthroplasty with the BIAS (Biologic Ingrowth Anatomic System) femoral component. Three to six-year results.
    Hussamy O; Lachiewicz PF
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1994 Aug; 76(8):1137-48. PubMed ID: 8056794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Use of porous tantalum components in Paprosky two and three acetabular revision. A minimum five-year follow-up of fifty one hips.
    Flecher X; Appy B; Parratte S; Ollivier M; Argenson JN
    Int Orthop; 2017 May; 41(5):911-916. PubMed ID: 27766385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Revision of the acetabular component without cement after a previous acetabular reconstruction with use of a bulk femoral head graft in patients who had congenital dislocation or dysplasia. A follow-up note.
    Bal BS; Maurer T; Harris WH
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1999 Dec; 81(12):1703-6. PubMed ID: 10608381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Acetabular revision after failed total hip arthroplasty in patients with congenital hip dislocation and dysplasia. Results after a mean of 8.6 years.
    Dearborn JT; Harris WH
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2000 Aug; 82(8):1146-53. PubMed ID: 10954105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Revision of a failed cemented total hip prosthesis with insertion of an acetabular component without cement and a femoral component with cement. A five to eight-year follow-up study.
    Weber KL; Callaghan JJ; Goetz DD; Johnston RC
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1996 Jul; 78(7):982-94. PubMed ID: 8698734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Limits in cementless hip revision total hip arthroplasty. Midterm experience with an oblong revision cup].
    Götze C; Sippel C; Wendt G; Steinbeck J
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2003; 141(2):182-9. PubMed ID: 12695955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Treatment of pelvic osteolysis associated with a stable acetabular component inserted without cement as part of a total hip replacement.
    Maloney WJ; Herzwurm P; Paprosky W; Rubash HE; Engh CA
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1997 Nov; 79(11):1628-34. PubMed ID: 9384421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Revision of the acetabular component with an uncemented Harris-Galante porous-coated prosthesis.
    Tanzer M; Drucker D; Jasty M; McDonald M; Harris WH
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1992 Aug; 74(7):987-94. PubMed ID: 1522106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Primary hybrid total hip replacement, performed with insertion of the acetabular component without cement and a precoat femoral component with cement. An average ten-year follow-up study.
    Clohisy JC; Harris WH
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1999 Feb; 81(2):247-55. PubMed ID: 10073588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Harris-Galante porous-coated acetabular component with screw fixation. An average ten-year follow-up study.
    Clohisy JC; Harris WH
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1999 Jan; 81(1):66-73. PubMed ID: 9973056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A randomized trial of hydroxyapatite coated prostheses in total hip arthroplasty.
    Yee AJ; Kreder HK; Bookman I; Davey JR
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1999 Sep; (366):120-32. PubMed ID: 10627726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Second-generation cementless total hip arthroplasty. Eight to eleven-year results.
    Archibeck MJ; Berger RA; Jacobs JJ; Quigley LR; Gitelis S; Rosenberg AG; Galante JO
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2001 Nov; 83(11):1666-73. PubMed ID: 11701789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bulk structural autogenous grafts and allografts for reconstruction of the acetabulum in total hip arthroplasty. Sixteen-year-average follow-up.
    Shinar AA; Harris WH
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1997 Feb; 79(2):159-68. PubMed ID: 9052535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cementless acetabular revision for aseptic failure of cemented hip arthroplasty.
    Chareancholvanich K; Tanchuling A; Seki T; Gustilo RB
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1999 Apr; (361):140-9. PubMed ID: 10212607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cortical Strut Allograft Support of Modular Femoral Junctions During Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.
    Lim CT; Amanatullah DF; Huddleston JI; Hwang KL; Maloney WJ; Goodman SB
    J Arthroplasty; 2017 May; 32(5):1586-1592. PubMed ID: 28130016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Primary total hip replacement with insertion of an acetabular component without cement and a femoral component with cement. Follow-up study at an average of six years.
    Woolson ST; Haber DF
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1996 May; 78(5):698-705. PubMed ID: 8642026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Revision hip arthroplasty using strut allografts and fully porous-coated stems.
    Kim YH; Kim JS
    J Arthroplasty; 2005 Jun; 20(4):454-9. PubMed ID: 16124960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Metal-Cancellous Cementless Lübeck total hip arthroplasty. Five-to-nine-year results.
    Matsui M; Nakata K; Masuhara K; Ohzono K; Sugano N; Ochi T
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1998 May; 80(3):404-10. PubMed ID: 9619926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.