190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9195316)
21. Custom-made segmental femoral replacement prosthesis in revision total hip arthroplasty.
Malkani AL; Sim FH; Chao EY
Orthop Clin North Am; 1993 Oct; 24(4):727-33. PubMed ID: 8414438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Revision of the acetabular component without cement after total hip arthroplasty. A follow-up note regarding results at seven to eleven years.
Silverton CD; Rosenberg AG; Sheinkop MB; Kull LR; Galante JO
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1996 Sep; 78(9):1366-70. PubMed ID: 8816652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The porous coated anatomic total hip replacement. A ten to fourteen-year follow-up study of a cementless total hip arthroplasty.
Kawamura H; Dunbar MJ; Murray P; Bourne RB; Rorabeck CH
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2001 Sep; 83(9):1333-8. PubMed ID: 11568195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Hybrid total hip arthroplasty with a precoated offset stem. Four to nine-year results.
Cannestra VP; Berger RA; Quigley LR; Jacobs JJ; Rosenberg AG; Galante JO
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2000 Sep; 82(9):1291-9. PubMed ID: 11005520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Total hip arthroplasty with a cemented, polished, collared femoral stem and a cementless acetabular component. A follow-up study at a minimum of ten years.
Firestone DE; Callaghan JJ; Liu SS; Goetz DD; Sullivan PM; Vittetoe DA; Johnston RC
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2007 Jan; 89(1):126-32. PubMed ID: 17200319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Fate of cementless acetabular components retained during revision total hip arthroplasty.
Beaulé PE; Le Duff MJ; Dorey FJ; Amstutz HC
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2003 Dec; 85(12):2288-93. PubMed ID: 14668496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. High placement of an acetabular component inserted without cement in a revision total hip arthroplasty. Results after a mean of ten years.
Dearborn JT; Harris WH
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1999 Apr; 81(4):469-80. PubMed ID: 10225792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Isolated acetabular revision with femoral stem retention after bipolar hip arthroplasty.
Kaku N; Tabata T; Tagomori H; Tsumura H
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2017 Mar; 137(3):425-430. PubMed ID: 28150224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Radiographic scoring system for the evaluation of stability of cementless acetabular components in the presence of osteolysis.
Narkbunnam R; Amanatullah DF; Electricwala AJ; Huddleston JI; Maloney WJ; Goodman SB
Bone Joint J; 2017 May; 99-B(5):601-606. PubMed ID: 28455468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Cementless acetabular revision with the Harris-Galante porous prosthesis. Results after a minimum of ten years of follow-up.
Hallstrom BR; Golladay GJ; Vittetoe DA; Harris WH
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2004 May; 86(5):1007-11. PubMed ID: 15118045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Extra-large uncemented hemispherical acetabular components for revision total hip arthroplasty.
Whaley AL; Berry DJ; Harmsen WS
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2001 Sep; 83(9):1352-7. PubMed ID: 11568198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Survivorship of femoral revision hip arthroplasty in patients with osteonecrosis.
Hungerford MW; Hungerford DS; Khanuja HS; Pietryak BP; Jones LC
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2006 Nov; 88 Suppl 3():126-30. PubMed ID: 17079378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The use of femoral struts and impacted cancellous bone allograft in patients with severe femoral bone loss who undergo revision total hip replacement: a three- to nine-year follow-up.
Buttaro MA; Costantini J; Comba F; Piccaluga F
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Feb; 94(2):167-72. PubMed ID: 22323680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Structural Allograft Supporting a Trabecular Metal Cup Provides Durable Results in Complex Revision Arthroplasty.
Prieto HA; Kralovec ME; Berry DJ; Trousdale RT; Sierra RJ; Cabanela ME
J Arthroplasty; 2017 Nov; 32(11):3488-3494. PubMed ID: 28662954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Cortical strut allografts for the treatment of femoral fractures and deficiencies in revision total hip arthroplasty.
Logel KJ; Lachiewicz PF; Schmale GA; Kelley SS
J South Orthop Assoc; 1999; 8(3):163-72; discussion 172. PubMed ID: 12132861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Porous Femoral Fixation in Total Hip Arthroplasty with Short Anatomical Stem: Radiographic Evaluation.
Patil S; Luis C; Finn H
Clin Orthop Surg; 2017 Sep; 9(3):255-262. PubMed ID: 28861191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The 21- to 27-year results of the Harris-Galante cementless total hip arthroplasty.
Kawamura H; Mishima H; Sugaya H; Nishino T; Shimizu Y; Miyakawa S
J Orthop Sci; 2016 May; 21(3):342-7. PubMed ID: 26970833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Major femoral bone loss in revision total hip arthroplasty treated with tapered, porous-coated stems.
Whiteside LA
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2004 Dec; (429):222-6. PubMed ID: 15577491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a Cementless Cup Supporter and Iliac Autograft: A Minimum of 15-Year Follow-Up.
Yoshino K; Tsukeoka T; Tsuneizumi Y; Lee TH; Nakamura J; Suzuki M; Ohtori S
J Arthroplasty; 2017 Nov; 32(11):3495-3501. PubMed ID: 28697865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Charnley total hip arthroplasty with cement. Minimum twenty-five-year follow-up.
Callaghan JJ; Albright JC; Goetz DD; Olejniczak JP; Johnston RC
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2000 Apr; 82(4):487-97. PubMed ID: 10761939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
