These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9195630)

  • 1. Digitizing of radiographs with a roller-type CCD scanner.
    Chen SK; Chiang TC
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1997 Jun; 83(6):719-24. PubMed ID: 9195630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Digitizing of radiographs with a flatbed scanner.
    Chen SK; Hollender L
    J Dent; 1995 Aug; 23(4):205-8. PubMed ID: 7629323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. 35-mm film scanner as an intraoral dental radiograph digitizer. I: A quantitative evaluation.
    Shrout MK; Potter BJ; Yurgalavage HM; Hildebolt CF; Vannier MW
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1993 Oct; 76(4):502-9. PubMed ID: 8233432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Digitisation and display of intra-oral films.
    Attaelmanan A; Borg E; Gröndahl HG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Mar; 29(2):97-102. PubMed ID: 10808223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A perceptibility curve comparison of Ultra-speed and Ektaspeed Plus films.
    Tjelmeland EM; Moore WS; Hermesch CB; Buikema DJ
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1998 Apr; 85(4):485-8. PubMed ID: 9574962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Spatial resolution requirements for digitizing dental radiographs.
    Kassebaum DK; McDavid WD; Dove SB; Waggener RG
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1989 Jun; 67(6):760-9. PubMed ID: 2740097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Digitally Scanned Radiographs versus Conventional Films for Determining Clarity of Periapical Lesions and Quality of Root Canal Treatment.
    Almanei K; Alsulaimani R; Alfadda S; Albabtain S; Alsulaimani R
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2017; 2017():2427060. PubMed ID: 29270461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Film-screen systems: sensitometric comparison of Kodak Ektavision system to Kodak T-Mat/RA system.
    Thunthy KH; Weinberg R
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1997 Feb; 83(2):288-92. PubMed ID: 9117763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Some characteristics of solid-state and photo-stimulable phosphor detectors for intra-oral radiography.
    Borg E
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1999; 139():i-viii, 1-67. PubMed ID: 10635104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Optical densities of dental resin composites: a comparison of CCD, storage phosphor, and Ektaspeed plus radiographic film.
    Farman TT; Farman AG; Scarfe WC; Goldsmith LJ
    Gen Dent; 1996; 44(6):532-7. PubMed ID: 9515395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Intraoral computed radiography using the Fuji computed radiography imaging plate. Correlation between image quality and reading condition.
    Kashima I; Sakurai T; Matsuki T; Nakamura K; Aoki H; Ishii M; Kanagawa Y
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1994 Aug; 78(2):239-46. PubMed ID: 7936596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Scanning resolution and the detection of approximal caries.
    Janhom A; van Ginkel FC; van Amerongen JP; van der Stelt PF
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 May; 30(3):166-71. PubMed ID: 11420630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clarity and diagnostic quality of digitized conventional intraoral radiographs.
    Goga R; Chandler NP; Love RM
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Mar; 33(2):103-7. PubMed ID: 15314002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Factors determining the diagnostic accuracy of digitized conventional intraoral radiographs.
    Ohki M; Okano T; Nakamura T
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1994 May; 23(2):77-82. PubMed ID: 7835507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of an Epson flatbed scanner to read Gafchromic EBT films for radiation dosimetry.
    Ferreira BC; Lopes MC; Capela M
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Feb; 54(4):1073-85. PubMed ID: 19168937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In vitro perception of low-contrast features in digital, film, and digitized dental radiographs: a receiver operating characteristic analysis.
    Grassl U; Schulze RK
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 May; 103(5):694-701. PubMed ID: 17466887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Important considerations for radiochromic film dosimetry with flatbed CCD scanners and EBT GAFCHROMIC film.
    Lynch BD; Kozelka J; Ranade MK; Li JG; Simon WE; Dempsey JF
    Med Phys; 2006 Dec; 33(12):4551-6. PubMed ID: 17278806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Investigation of the imaging properties of an x-ray film scanner.
    Döler W; Rassow S; Jäger A; Vosshenrich R
    Phys Med Biol; 1994 May; 39(5):917-22. PubMed ID: 15552094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of the epson expression 1680 flatbed and the vidar VXR-16 dosimetry PRO film scanners for use in IMRT dosimetry using gafchromic and radiographic film.
    Wilcox E; Daskalov G; Nedialkova L
    Med Phys; 2007 Jan; 34(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 17278488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Radiography in endodontics.
    Bridgman JB; Campbell DJ
    N Z Dent J; 1995 Jun; 91(404):62-4. PubMed ID: 7675349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.